Channel
@feeling_everyday
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,749subscribers
-64 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001885452534 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @feeling_everyday |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/feeling_everyday |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 9,749 | -14 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 9,763 | -15 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 9,778 | -16 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 9,794 | -13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:21 | 9,807 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 9,813 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 9,813 | first reading |
64 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 64 (2 August 2026 – 20 August 2026) |
| Views total | 28,569 |
| Reactions total | 875 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
875 reactions across 64 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 318 | 36.3% | |
| 👍 | 290 | 33.1% | |
| 💯 | 103 | 11.8% | |
| 🔥 | 78 | 8.91% | |
| ❤🔥 | 47 | 5.37% | |
| 🙏 | 20 | 2.29% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 1.26% | |
| 👌 | 8 | 0.914% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 875reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @feeling_everyday. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 64 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Всякий раз, когда вы вновь ловите себя на мысли, что вам нужен кто-то другой для удовлетворения ваших потребностей, напомните себе: все, что вам нужно для ощущения собственной целостности, полноценности и удовлетворенности, уже есть внутри вас. Искусство быть счастливой
💯6❤4👍1
Боль — часть жизни, от неё не спрятаться. Но страдать из-за неё или принять её и двигаться дальше — уже твой выбор. Искусство быть счастливой
🔥4👌3👍2
Страх — это естественно. Он был у каждого, даже у самых сильных. Но разница в том, что слабый отступает, а сильный идёт навстречу. Пойми одно: страх — это сигнал роста. Если тебе страшно — значит, ты на границе своих возможностей. Побеждать страх можно только действием. Каждый шаг через него — это новое расширение твоих границ. Там, где раньше был страх, завтра будет твоя сила. Искусство быть счастливой
💯8❤3👍2
Счaстье не в тoм, чтобы имeть всe, что хoчeшь, а в тoм, чтoбы хoтeть все, чтo имeeшь. Искусство быть счастливой
❤11👍1
Когда идти легко, а возвращаться трудно, такая местность называется наклонной. Искусство быть счастливой
👍5❤3
Тренируйся с теми, кто сильнее. Не сдавайся там, где сдаются другие. И победишь там, где победить нельзя. Брюс Ли Искусство быть счастливой
❤10👍6
Я — единственный на свете человек, которого мне бы хотелось узнать получше. Оскар Уайльд Искусство быть счастливой
❤🔥7💯4❤3
Жизнь тем и интересна, что в ней сны могут стать явью. Пауло Коэльо Искусство быть счастливой
❤11
Когда человек одинок, он начинает присматриваться к природе и любить её. Эрих Мария Ремарк Искусство быть счастливой
👍10❤4🙏4
Так странно — участвовать в чьей-то жизни вплоть до мелочей, а потом вдруг не знать совсем ничего. А еще странно, когда думаешь, что знаешь кого-то, а потом понимаешь, что, возможно, не знал о нем совсем ничего. Колин Гувер Искусство быть счастливой
💯11👍7👏3❤1
Слишком тонкая чувствительность есть истинное несчастье. Карл Юлиус Вебер Искусство быть счастливой
❤5👍3💯2
Всякая жизнь, хорошо прожитая, есть долгая жизнь. Леонардо да Винчи Искусство быть счастливой
❤6👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @feeling_everyday. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Искусство быть счастливой” (@feeling_everyday), 9,749 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feeling_everyday.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.