Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

1703

@sp_1703

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

53,344subscribers

-263 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001194855148
TypeChannel
Username@sp_1703
Created5 December 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sp_1703

Growth

53,34453,60753,475.55 August 2026 — 53,607 subscribers6 August 2026 — 53,607 subscribers6 August 2026 — 53,568 subscribers7 August 2026 — 53,523 subscribers8 August 2026 — 53,480 subscribers9 August 2026 — 53,441 subscribers10 August 2026 — 53,401 subscribers11 August 2026 — 53,379 subscribers12 August 2026 — 53,344 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -263. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53,305–53,646 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:4753,344-35
11 Aug 2026, 21:5353,379-22
10 Aug 2026, 21:1153,401-40
9 Aug 2026, 23:3653,441-39
8 Aug 2026, 23:0253,480-43
7 Aug 2026, 21:5153,523-45
6 Aug 2026, 21:5353,568-39
6 Aug 2026, 01:4553,607no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:4753,607first reading

Engagement

76 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 53,344 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,520
76 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.575%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
76
of 76 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held76 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total419,310
Reactions total2,409
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11m 04s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,895 reactions across 62 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍38520.3%
28515.0%
🤬25613.5%
🤡1427.49%
👎1377.23%
🤯1306.86%
🤣1216.39%
🔥965.07%
😱794.17%
😨492.59%
🥴402.11%
🕊392.06%
🙏241.27%
😁211.11%
🤔160.844%
🍌130.686%
120.633%
❤‍🔥90.475%
👌60.317%
👏60.317%
13 further kinds291.53%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 76 of the 76 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,409reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 76 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sp_1703. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 76 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC318 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Если вы пропустили солнечное затмение, вот как оно выглядело так А если не пропустили, то покидайте нам фото/видео 🥰 @open_message1703_bot 🤩 Подписаться на 1703 — лучший новостник Питера, но это не точно

😁6🤡1

12 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC≈1,050 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🛴 Борьба с самокатами в Питере вышла на какой-то новый уровень. Как думаете, это решит проблему кикшеринга на тротуарах или мужик просто заработал себе на административку? 🤩 Подписаться на 1703 — лучший новостник Питера, но это не точно

🤔7👍6🤡63👎2

12 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC≈1,570 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌸 Быстрые свидания на этой неделе Три вечера, чтобы познакомиться вживую, пообщаться и найти свою взаимную симпатию ❤️ 📅 14 августа | 19:00–21:30 📍 «ЕдаВеда» — м. Горьковская 📅 15 августа | 17:00–20:00 📍 БЦ «Дворец Кваренги» — м. Невский пр. 📅 16 августа | 17:00–20:00 📍 ресторан «Савори» — м. Сенная ⚠️ На 16.08 Остались только мужские места! ✨ Живое общение • 10+ знакомств за вечер • комфортный формат Выбирайте д

3💊1🤡1🤩1🥴1😍1

12 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC≈1,780 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026

👵 Не штрафовать бабушек за торговлю у метро попросили в Петербурге Депутаты предложили освободить пожилых людей от штрафов за продажу небольшого количества товаров в неразрешённых местах, если это не нарушает санитарные нормы. Сейчас за такую торговлю грозит штраф до 5 тысяч рублей. 🤩 Подписаться на 1703 — лучший новостник Питера, но это не точно

👍29🕊5🥴4👎2

12 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC≈2,200 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🤡5👍2🤬21

12 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC≈2,790 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @trendswhatPhoto

Сегодня ночью в небе можно будет увидеть сразу ТРИ звёздных шоу. В 19:59 по Москве начнётся частичное солнечное затмение — увидеть его смогут жители Питера и более северных регионов. А в 5:00 13 августа наступит пик Персеид: за метеорами лучше ехать подальше от города. И это ещё не всё: с 21:30 до 4:00 ожидается парад планет — Нептун, Сатурн, Уран, Марс, Меркурий и Юпитер окажутся в одной небесной компании. Ночной

👍13🤩2🥴21👀1

12 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC≈3,370 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

✨ Фестиваль о мечтах DreamFest состоится 14, 15 и 16 августа в Юсуповском саду Посещение фестиваля – это увлекательное путешествие сквозь эпохи, где сказка встречается с реальностью, а музыка доносится из каждого уголка. И всё это – в самом сердце Петербурга! Что будет интересного: 🎸 рок-хиты в исполнении симфонического оркестра 🔥 огненно-пиротехническая сага 🌔 уникальное флайборд шоу над огромной Луной 🤩рояль в це

3👎3👍2🤔2😱2🤩1

12 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC932 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

12 августа 1910 года над Волховском поле впервые в истории в воздух поднялся военный российский дирижабль «Кречет». «Кречет» был полностью сделан из отечественных материалов (кроме двигателя), а за основу конструкции был взят французский дирижабль «Патре». 🤩 Подписаться на 1703 — лучший новостник Питера, но это не точно

🔥6

11 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC≈4,720 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

B Петербурге набирает популярность новый тренд – вовлеченное отцовство. Доказательство тому – растущее число мужчин с колясками на детских площадках. 🤩 Подписаться на 1703 — лучший новостник Питера, но это не точно

🔥28👍9🤡8👎2🤪1

11 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC≈4,890 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

⚓️ В ближайшие дни со дна Невы поднимут бывший плавучий ресторан «Акварель» Судно, затонувшее у набережной Макарова, окончательно освободят из водного плена. Спасательная операция стартовала в ночь на 11 августа — водолазы приступили к подъёму дебаркадера. Однако с первого раза затея не удалась: специалистам пришлось сначала герметизировать корпус, а затем откачивать воду с помощью шести мощных насосов. Помешала п

🤣9👍4🤯4🕊2🙏2

11 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC≈5,210 views78 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

😳 В Петербурге продавщица набросилась на 13-летнего парня из-за мороженого Женщина вцепилась ему в шею, прокусила ухо и с размаху бросила на пол, после чего встала коленом на грудь. Но самое страшное — по словам родных, у пацана совсем недавно был компрессионный перелом позвоночника, и такое падение могло оставить его инвалидом. Родители уже обратились в органы, сейчас проводится проверка. 🤩 Подписаться на 1703 —

🤯46🤬243😨2👀1👏1😡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 76 posts we hold for @sp_1703. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 30,729 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

True Питер - Настоящий Питер
@true_piter · 245,760
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Mash на Мойке
@mashmoyka · 333,580
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Фонтанка SPB Online
@fontankaspb · 376,480
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“1703” (@sp_1703), 53,344 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sp_1703.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.