Channel
@breaking_spb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,775subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001496287273 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @breaking_spb |
| Description | 🎯Жизнь Петербурга, какая она есть ☎️ Предложить новость - @RV_Piter_bot Для связи - @SPB_vot |
| Created | 16 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/breaking_spb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 8,775 | -8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 8,783 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 8,785 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 8,785 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 8 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
590 reactions across 18 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 122 | 20.7% | |
| ❤ | 103 | 17.5% | |
| 🔥 | 65 | 11.0% | |
| 🤣 | 47 | 7.97% | |
| 😁 | 42 | 7.12% | |
| 😱 | 35 | 5.93% | |
| 💩 | 31 | 5.25% | |
| ☃ | 30 | 5.08% | |
| 🤬 | 28 | 4.75% | |
| 😢 | 15 | 2.54% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 2.03% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 1.36% | |
| 🤮 | 8 | 1.36% | |
| 🎅 | 6 | 1.02% | |
| 🤡 | 6 | 1.02% | |
| 🫡 | 6 | 1.02% | |
| 🖕 | 5 | 0.847% | |
| 🌚 | 4 | 0.678% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 0.508% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.339% | |
| 8 further kinds | 12 | 2.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 590reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2025 to 22 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Полезная папка по каналам Санкт-Петербурга🇷🇺 Больше не нужно искать тематические каналы и по отдельности на них подписываться — мы сделали это за вас ⭐️ Вам остается только перейти по ссылке, сохранить папку себе и регулярно получать полезную информацию,афиши,новости,работу и многое другое в Санкт-Петербурге🇷🇺 Добавляй папку себе
💩20❤14👍10🤮7🤡3
Высота сугробов в Петербурге достигла максимальных 29 см. ⏰Раньше всех. Петербург
☃30🎅6🫡6👍2💩2🤣1😁1
Полезная папка по каналам Санкт-Петербурга🇷🇺 Больше не нужно искать тематические каналы и по отдельности на них подписываться — мы сделали это за вас ⭐️ Вам остается только перейти по ссылке, сохранить папку себе и регулярно получать полезную информацию,афиши,новости,работу и многое другое в Санкт-Петербурге🇷🇺 Добавляй папку себе
💩5🥰3❤1👍1
😆Огромный п***с положили петербуржцы на заброшенную машину. ⏰Раньше всех. Петербург
🔥20👍6😁4❤2🤯2❤🔥1💩1
😅«У меня просто друг на улице какает» Мужчина вломился в салон красоты, чтобы ему оказали необычную услугу. ⏰Раньше всех. Петербург
😁27🤬13❤1🙊1
Паром «АНТЕЙ» начнёт регулярно ходить из Петербурга в Калининград. Рейсы начнутся с с 15 января. Стоимость билета в одну сторону — 6 820 рублей. За перевозку машины придётся заплатить почти 75 000 рублей. Отправляться судно будет с терминала «Морской Фасад». ⏰Раньше всех. Петербург
👍39❤9🌚2🍌1🍓1💩1
😱71-летний петербуржец отсудил 350 тысяч рублей у гипермаркета из-за падения на входе Мужчина получил травму, споткнувшись о пятисантиметровый штырь-ограничитель. Позже он обратился с иском в районный суд и потребовал компенсировать моральный вред. В итоге приставы взыскали с гипермаркета компенсацию. ⏰Раньше всех. Петербург
🔥38👍18⚡3❤3💩1
Женщина из Ленобласти отдала 3,2 млн гадалке, чтобы стать стройной и богатой. Дамочка покупала ритуалы в течение нескольких лет, брала кредиты и отдавала свои украшения в качестве оплаты за услуги. Когда сумма перевалила за 3 млн, а Ольга так и не стала богатой и стройной, пошла в полицию. ⏰Раньше всех. Петербург
🤣29😁9❤4🤔2
😱Крупный пожар произошел в Гатчине. Горит промзона на Индустриальной улице. ⏰Раньше всех. Петербург
😢10🥰3❤1🎉1🤷1
Главная новогодняя ёлка Петербурга задымилась на Дворцовой площади - этот момент засняла телеведущая и блогер Анастасия Ивлеева. В МЧС сообщили, что на высоте 6-7 метров произошло короткое замыкание без последующего горения в гирлянде. 3-х метровый участок украшения демонтировали. ⏰Раньше всех. Петербург
😱13🖕3🤣3❤1❤🔥1
В ЖК Юбилейный квартал проводили новогодние праздники ⏰Раньше всех. Петербург
🎉7🖕2👍1
Тело мужчины обнаружено в салоне автомобиля Volkswagen, извлеченного из-под льда противопожарного водоема в посёлке "Остров" Кировского района ЛО. По предварительным данным, до гибели 42-летний Вячеслав выпивал с приятелями, потом позвонил жене и сообщил, что сел за руль и скоро будет дома. Больше он не выходил на связь. ⏰Раньше всех. Петербург
😱8🌚1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @breaking_spb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 271,874 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Раньше всех. Петербург” (@breaking_spb), 8,775 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/breaking_spb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.