Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net -378. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,439–21,931 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 19:41
21,496
-84
17 Sept 2026, 09:59
21,580
+3
15 Sept 2026, 08:59
21,577
+37
13 Sept 2026, 17:57
21,540
-13
11 Sept 2026, 21:01
21,553
-36
9 Sept 2026, 06:59
21,589
-21
6 Sept 2026, 00:55
21,610
-22
3 Sept 2026, 18:19
21,632
-8
2 Sept 2026, 10:44
21,640
-1
1 Sept 2026, 09:05
21,641
-9
31 Aug 2026, 09:27
21,650
-11
30 Aug 2026, 10:19
21,661
-2
29 Aug 2026, 12:54
21,663
-3
28 Aug 2026, 16:06
21,666
-9
27 Aug 2026, 19:06
21,675
-10
26 Aug 2026, 20:36
21,685
-10
25 Aug 2026, 18:19
21,695
-15
24 Aug 2026, 19:32
21,710
-15
23 Aug 2026, 05:56
21,725
-16
21 Aug 2026, 14:47
21,741
first reading
Engagement
82 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
32.4%
avg views ÷ 21,496 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,960
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 82 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
82 (19 July 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
278,380
Reactions total
11,623
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Sept 2026, 07:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
585
Videos
533
Links
55
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
35m 42s
Average length
1m 42s
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
26,446 reactions across 81 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
9,793
37.0%
💔
3,584
13.6%
🫡
3,072
11.6%
💯
2,019
7.63%
👍
1,737
6.57%
😢
1,447
5.47%
🤬
1,250
4.73%
😁
567
2.14%
🔥
513
1.94%
🤣
468
1.77%
😭
386
1.46%
🙏
330
1.25%
👎
324
1.23%
🥰
320
1.21%
🤮
157
0.594%
😡
95
0.359%
👏
76
0.287%
🤔
57
0.216%
🤡
33
0.125%
🍌
32
0.121%
22 further kinds
186
0.703%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 82 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26,446 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
في ذكرى استشهاد السيد حسن نصر الله، لابد من الوقوف على حالة الفقر الذي تعاني منه بيئة المقاومة على صعيد الحضور الإعلامي والخطاب، فلا يكاد يوجد قائد واحد استطاع ملء الفراغ الذي خلّفه استشهاده، كأقوى زعيم عربي استطاع مخاطبة الجمهور.
كان السيد تقبله الله يملك خلطة عجيبة في قدرته على الحضور، فكان يخاطب الناس كقائد كثيف الرمزية في الحروب والانتصارات، وكأب لهم كأرقى ما يكون عنه حنان الأب في الهزائم والانكسارات، ولا يخاف…
في كلمته في الأمم المتحدة قبل قليل، أحضر نتنياهو معه جهاز بيجر متباهياً بالعملية التي نفذها ضد حزب الله.
هل توقفت انجازات نتنياهو عند حدود تلك العملية حتى يتباهى بحدث مضى عليه عامين ؟!
ربما استطاع الوفد الإيراني أمس سحب الذرائع بموافقته عقد اللقاء مع الأمريكيين، لكن ترمب المتيّم بالصورة استطاع أن يقدم رواية منحته نقاطاً إيجابية من اللقاء أكثر من الإيرانيين.
بكل الأحوال، لا يحمل اللقاء تلك الأهمية، بل جرت العادة أن يتبع جولات التفاوض تصعيداً
بعد موافقة عمان وأذربيجان على حظر الرحلات الإيرانية، أمين المجلس الأعلى للأمن القومي الإيراني، محسن رضائي يقول:
يجب على الدول المجاورة ألا تتدخل في مسألة رحلات الطائرات الإيرانية، ولا أن تنخرط في المغامرات الأمريكية.
إذا حدث ذلك، فسنمنع رحلات الطائرات التابعة للدول المجاورة التي تتعاون مع الولايات المتحدة.
في سياق أكثر ذكاء وحكمة كان يمكن للرئيس السوري أن يوجّه رسالته للمستوطنين الاسرائيليين بالقول: الجموا حكومتكم المتطرفة، التي تحتل سوريا وتقتل شعبها وتستبيح سماءها وأرضها، بدلاً من أن يتعاطف مع من سمّاهم (أبرياء).
صاحب الاتصال الشهير في يوم العبور المجيد، والذي أبلغ به والده بقتله ١٠ جنود صهاينة..
...
وصاحب المشهد الأسطوري خلال معركة طوفان الأقصى وتنافسه على وضع عبوة العمل الفدائي
على إحدى آليات العدو ..
...
الشهيد القسامي المجاهد:
..محمود مهدي عفانة..
...
كتيبة الشهيد سهيل زيادة - لواء الشمال
كشف الطوفان عن طبقة نخبوية دعيّة، لطالما قدّمت نفسها كعنوان للثورة والمقاومة، لكنها -وعند الاختبار الحقيقي- فشلت في تقديم أي شيء ذا قيمة.
هذه الطبقة التي اختارت القعود على النصرة، وفشلت حدّ السقوط، تتعامل اليوم بقدر عالٍ من الوقاحة حدّ الاستحقاق، بدلاً من الاعتراف بالفشل، والبحث لها عن دور حقيقي يتجاوز الكلام والتحريض الطائفي إلى الفعل.
تنظر هذه الطبقة (القاعدة) إلى نخبة غزة البطلة التي ضحّت وصمدت وقاتلت في أعظم مع…
منطق المقاومة وتحرير المنطقة يفرض علينا أن ننظر لكل بندقية مصوّبة ضد بعضنا بعضاً أنها معركة عبثية، وحرب أهلية مرفوضة، وأن الوجهة الوحيدة الصحيحة الوحيدة هي نحو العدو الذي يحتلّنا جميعاً.
حالة التحشيد التي تشهدها المنطقة اليوم تحت راية الطائفية ليست سوى عبث وجنون وقلة حكمة، ولو وجدنا نصف هذا التحشيد الذي يقوده قادة وعلماء ونخب في معركة غزة لما حدثت هذه الإبادة.
كل محرض على الدم هو شريك فيه بالضرورة، وكل معركة ليست ض…
Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @saidziad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Fayez Al-Dwairi I اللواء فايز الدويري @fayezaldwairi52 · 22,194 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 September 2026
إسماعيل الغول - Ismail Alghoul @ismail_gh2 · 28,203 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
أحمد دراوشة - التلفزيون العربي @AhmadDarawsheh · 42,475 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سعيد زياد” (@saidziad), 21,496 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saidziad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
