Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for المجد الأمني

Channel

المجد الأمني

@almajdps0

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,577subscribers

-693 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001567547578
TypeChannel
Username@almajdps0
Descriptionالقناة الرسمية لموقع (المجد الأمني) المختص في التوعية الأمنية - فلسطين
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/almajdps0

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (3 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@almajdps0/9347 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC@palnws24/4095467 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC1.00under a minute
@almajdps0/9374 · this entry22 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC@palnws24/41050022 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC1.00under a minute
@almajdps0/9395 · this entry2 Sept 2026, 15:44 UTC@palnws24/4113142 Sept 2026, 15:44 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@palnws245 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 80 comparable posts for this entry, running 27 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

19,57720,27019,923.57 August 202611 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net -693. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,473–20,374 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 14:1819,577-12
9 Nov 2026, 20:5619,589-17
8 Nov 2026, 09:1719,606-18
7 Nov 2026, 03:0619,624-4
6 Nov 2026, 00:0619,628-5
4 Nov 2026, 22:4019,633-14
3 Nov 2026, 22:5619,647-11
3 Nov 2026, 01:0119,658-5
1 Nov 2026, 22:4919,663-9
31 Oct 2026, 21:1719,672+7
30 Oct 2026, 22:0019,665-14
29 Oct 2026, 20:5019,679-4
28 Oct 2026, 19:1919,683-8
27 Oct 2026, 17:3719,691+3
26 Oct 2026, 19:0719,688-5
25 Oct 2026, 22:1019,693-8
24 Oct 2026, 20:2619,701-12
23 Oct 2026, 21:1919,713-11
23 Oct 2026, 00:0819,724-13
21 Oct 2026, 22:3919,737first reading

Engagement

92 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.4%
avg views ÷ 19,577 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,430
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 92 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held92 (27 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total77,763
Reactions total1,454
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 16:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,710
Videos
≈169
Links
≈2,740

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
27m 22s
Average length
2m 06s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,927 reactions across 92 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,57965.7%
👍1,04926.7%
😢1343.41%
😱751.91%
🔥601.53%
😁280.713%
🎉20.051%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,927 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 32 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 20:29 UTC593 views28 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

🚨 المجد الأمني| 🎬 شاهد.. شاهد.. جاسوس في بيت مقاوم نحو وعي أمني https://t.me/almajdps0

❤22👍6

9 Nov 2026, 17:47 UTC≈1,010 views34 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🚨 تنويهٌ مهم🚨 🎙️ تواصل المخابرات "الإسرائيلية" العمل عبر صفحاتها على مواقع التواصل بهدف عملية التجنيد لصالحها وكذلك جمع المعلومات الأمنية، فضلاً عن الأهداف المتعلقة بالاغتيال المعنوي. نُحذر من التعاطي مع تلك الصفحات، وإبلاغ الجهات المختصة عن أي صفحة مشبوهة. المجد نحو وعي أمني https://t.me/almajdps0

❤24👍9🔥1

9 Nov 2026, 16:47 UTC≈1,040 views34 reactionsread 11 November 2026

💢 المجد الأمني| من أحد أهداف الاحتلال في إسقاط المتخابرين هو تشويه سمعة العائلات الفلسطينية وصورتها الناصعة، وعلينا ألا نحقق هدفه ونظلم أسر المتخابرين بجرم ابنهم. نحو وعي أمني

❤26👍8

9 Nov 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,100 views31 reactionsread 11 November 2026

💢 المجد الأمني| يعاني المُتخابر مع الاحتلال خلال فترة ارتباطه من القلق الدائم والخوف الشديد من الانكشاف والفضيحة، كما يعاني من الذل الذي يُمارسه الضابط ضده والمخاطر المستمرة التي يُعَرّضه لها دائماً. 👈 أما بعد انكشافه فيعاني من ذُل وعار الخيانة ومن العقوبة التي ستصدر بحقه، واستدراكه لما قد يتسببه لمن حوله من ألم جراء تخابره مع الاحتلال. نحو وعي أمني

👍19❤10🔥2

8 Nov 2026, 16:44 UTC≈1,270 views31 reactionsread 11 November 2026

💢 المجد الأمني| 🎙️ الاهتمام الذي يُظهره ضابط المخابرات بالمتخابر هو اهتمام وهمي ومؤقت للاستفادة منه في جمع أكبر قدر من المعلومات، ويزول هذا الاهتمام بمجرد تقصير المتخابر أو انكشافه أو الانزلاق في وحل التخابر بشكل أكبر. 👈 وهذا ما أكدته اعترافات العديد من المتخابرين والتي كشفت توبيخ الضابط المستمر لهم والشتم والتهديد المتكرر بمجرد أي تقصير حتى لو كان ذلك يُعرضهم للخطر، وبمجرد انكشاف المتخابر أو قرب انكشافه فإن الضابط…

❤24👍7

8 Nov 2026, 13:43 UTC≈1,190 views36 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

💢 المجد الأمني| ندعو كل من ضل الطريق وربط مصيره بالاحتلال إلى العودة للصف الوطني قبل فوات الأوان وتسليم نفسه لأجهزة أمن المقاومة. المجد.. نحو وعي أمني https://t.me/almajdps0

❤27👍9

7 Nov 2026, 16:42 UTC≈1,360 views50 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

💢 المجد الأمني| الإعدام هو مصير العملاء المتعاونين مع الاحتلال والمتساوقين مع مخططاته الرامية لمحاولة النيل من صمود شعبنا ووحدته. المجد.. نحو وعي أمني https://t.me/almajdps0

❤37👍12😁1

7 Nov 2026, 15:41 UTC≈1,460 views34 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

المجد الأمني| #انفوجرافيك.. 10 حقائق في تجربة عملاء الاحتلال! نحو وعي أمني

👍24❤10

5 Nov 2026, 16:34 UTC≈1,730 views49 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🚨 المجد الأمني| مواجهة العصابات العميلة ليست مسؤولية فئة دون أخرى، بل هي مسؤولية مجتمعية تقع على عاتق كل مواطن غيور على وطنه. هذه العصابات تعتمد على التسلل والغدر، والسعي لمحاولات تنفيذ اختراق، وبث الرعب بين المواطنين. لذلك، يجب علينا تعزيز "اليقظة المجتمعية" في كل منطقة وحي ومخيم، لتكون حصناً منيعاً ضد أي اختراق. كما وجب مراقبة أي تحركات غريبة أو مشبوهة، وألا نترك فرصة لهذه الفئة العميلة. إن أي تهاون مع هؤلاء ا…

❤37👍12

5 Nov 2026, 13:33 UTC≈1,520 views52 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🚨 المجد الأمني| بينما يبيع عناصر العصابات العميلة ذممهم للاحتلال، يقف أبطال المقاومة في الميادين والثغور يدافعون عن أرضهم وعرضهم بصدورهم العارية. تاريخنا سيخلد أسماء أبطال المقاومة والشهداء والأحرار، بينما سيلاحق العار كل من باع وطنه وحمل السلاح في وجه أهله لخدمة أعدائهم. نحو وعي أمني https://t.me/almajdps0

❤45👍7

4 Nov 2026, 19:31 UTC≈1,860 views44 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🚨 المجد الأمني| العصابات العميلة ليست سوى أدوات رخيصة لتنفيذ أجندات الاحتلال لتستهدف أمننا وسلامة مجتمعنا. هؤلاء الأفراد لا يملكون أي رصيد وطني أو شرعية، ويعتمدون في تكتيكاتهم على الغدر، والترهيب، ومحاولة بث الفوضى وزعزعة الأمن في الأحياء والمناطق. لا يتورعون عن استخدام أبناء جلدتهم كدروع بشرية أو أدوات لتحقيق مآربهم الحقيرة، ولن تجد منهم بطولة إلا عندما يستنجدون بأسيادهم (الاحتلال) طلباً للحماية. لذا يتوجب علينا…

❤33👍10😁1

3 Nov 2026, 16:49 UTC≈1,790 views43 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🚨 المجد الأمني| العدو الإسرائيلي يضاعف جهوده الاستخبارية في هذه المرحلة ولا يتوقف عن تعقب عناصر المقاومة لحظة بلحظة مستخدماً كل إمكانياته البشرية والتقنية والجوية. يجب الحذر من استخدام الجولات وتجنب الاجتماعات والتذكر أن العدو يعمل ليل نهار من أجل الحصول على المعلومة للعمل لاحقًا على تصفية عناصر المقاومة. لابد أن نكون أشد حرصاً في هذه الأوقات فهي أوقات الخطر الحقيقي. نحو وعي أمني https://t.me/almajdps0

❤37👍6

Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @almajdps0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

مش هيك
@meshheek · 374,939
#1
مؤمن مقداد
@mumenjmmeqdad · 258,847
#2
شبكة قدس الإخبارية
@qudsn · 603,983
#3
قناة الجزيرة
@ajanews · 1,302,563
#4
حسن اصليح | صحفي
@hpress · 517,653
#5
عبري لايف
@EabriLive · 228,975
#6
الهدهد
@alhodhud · 45,449
#7
الناشط حمزة المصري
@hamza20300 · 741,867
#8
تدوينة | أبو عاهد
@tadwena123 · 71,548
#9
واعي
@StayConscious2 · 14,556
#10
المكتبة الإسلامية
@hamaas1987 · 30,426
#11
المستشار احمد ابو اياد
@Almustashaar · 827,554
#12
أبو أحمد سمور
@abuahmadsm · 5,465
#13
الصحفي مثنى النجار
@muthanapress84 · 256,604
#14
القسطل الاخباري | القدس
@AlQastalps · 106,905
#15
المتقدمون
@mtqdmon · 552,939
#16
قناة الميادين | عاجل
@almayadeen · 468,880
#17
أمجاد الشهداء
@AMJAD_SHU · 51,999
#18
مصطفى ستيتان | قطاع غزة
@mo_stitan · 10,101
#19
ألإعلام العبري بالعربي
@MAH103MMED · 80,273
#20
الصحفي صهيب المسالمة- صحفي و مختص بالشؤون الأمنية
@Sohaibpress · 168,482
#21
هنا الحقيقة
@gazanewsnow2021 · 93,346
#22
الحارس
@alhares · 65,955
#23
الصحفي إسماعيل أبو عمر
@asmailpress · 84,581
#24
ألوية الناصر صلاح الدين
@alwya2000 · 18,192
#25
أنس الشريف Anas Al-Sharif
@anas1020304050 · 117,539
#26
أسامة خالد
@OsamaKaled · 9,392
#27
تكتيكات عسكرية🔻🇵🇸
@MilitaRy2021 · 39,071
#28
شبكة قدس فيد
@qudsfeed · 38,686
#29
المكتب الإعلامي الحكومي
@mediagovps · 9,936
#30
الجرمق الإخباري
@aljarmaqnet · 60,294
#31
الباب الوراني
@nabls_55 · 5,107
#32
ajmubasher
@ajMubasher · 2
#33
حزب الله الإلكتروني
@Electrohizbullah · 173,534
#34
رَوْضَةُ الشُّهَدَاءِ
@shohadaa96 · 12,526
#35
نيو برس | newpress
@newpress1 · 21,996
#36
abn.alkhalil | ابن الخليل
@abn_alkhalil_1987 · 17,349
#37
الجزيرة فلسطين
@AJPalestine · 257,711
#38
العُبور ‌‎𓂆🇵🇸
@Alobour · 2,671
#39
Jenin News | أخبار جنين
@jeninnews1 · 223,004
#40
مركز الخطابي للدراسات
@alkhattabirw · 44,510
#41
د. أبو محمود نائل
@dr_naelgazy · 37,332
#42
الكتلة الإسلامية- الضفة الغربية
@islamickutla22 · 3,522
#43
الأستاذ المترجم عزام ابو العدس
@azzamaddas · 253,023
#44
ياسين عز الدين
@yaseenizz · 17,179
#45
بيت العنكبوت
@ILSFall · 6,420
#46
رازق الحسن
@httpstjwFhjUvME4wN2Q6 · 16,071
#47
العميد يحيى سريع / المتحدث الرسمي للقوات المسلحة اليمنية
@army21ye · 267,084
#48
محبي الفنان علي نسمان
@alinassman · 19,589
#49
عكا للشؤون الإسرائيلية
@AkkaNews48 · 27,867
#50
أمناء الإعلام
@omanapal · 54,338
#51
ترجمات عبرية - شبكة قدس
@Qudsn_hebrew · 43,449
#52
الكايد أبو صالح 🇵🇸 🔻
@abosalih48 · 6,034
#53
الصحفي يوسف فارس
@youseffares19 · 63,225
#54
نابلس غير " الاخبارية 🇵🇸 "
@Nablusgheer · 377,408
#55
Hanzala
@hanzpal20 · 104,809
#56
Metras - متراس
@metrasweb · 21,312
#57
المترجم أحمد عمر المقادمة
@gfdxddvh · 35,600
#58
فلسطين بوست
@PalpostN · 58,424
#59

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

الحارس
@alhares · 65,955
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
Fayez Al-Dwairi I اللواء فايز الدويري
@fayezaldwairi52 · 21,441
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 September 2026
مساعدات غزة الصفحة الرسمية
@musaeadatgaza · 36,585
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
الاسطنبولي
@istanbulli1453a · 25,952
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
فرص عمل في تركيا
@jobsintr · 75,181
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 August 2026
الصحفي محمود العمودي - أبو صلاح
@mzmhaas · 32,049
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 4 September 2026
محبي الفنان علي نسمان
@alinassman · 19,589
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 28 September 2026
سعيد زياد
@saidziad · 21,136
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 23 September 2026
بيت شعر عربي كل يوم
@Arabicpoet0 · 40,800
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“المجد الأمني” (@almajdps0), 19,577 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/almajdps0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.