Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
63,200 average views per post against 102,139 subscribers — an engagement rate of 61.9%. Across the 582 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,034–311,185 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 1.23% and 10.4%, with a median of 3.71%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
19 of 19 published in the window (0 exact, 19 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
1,201,000
Mature posts only
61.9% over 19 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
66 measurements spanning 95 days, net +15,830. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 01:31
115,706
+612
9 Nov 2026, 18:22
115,094
no change
9 Nov 2026, 17:47
115,094
+115,079
8 Nov 2026, 22:06
15
-102,009
7 Nov 2026, 12:40
102,024
+5
6 Nov 2026, 14:59
102,019
-60
5 Nov 2026, 16:10
102,079
-60
4 Nov 2026, 18:21
102,139
+35
3 Nov 2026, 18:20
102,104
+77
2 Nov 2026, 20:50
102,027
-20
1 Nov 2026, 22:00
102,047
+76
1 Nov 2026, 00:06
101,971
+358
31 Oct 2026, 01:19
101,613
+40
30 Oct 2026, 00:16
101,573
-77
28 Oct 2026, 21:36
101,650
-17
27 Oct 2026, 23:35
101,667
-10
26 Oct 2026, 22:06
101,677
+61
25 Oct 2026, 19:17
101,616
+98
24 Oct 2026, 20:29
101,518
+112
23 Oct 2026, 21:35
101,406
first reading
Engagement
89 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 186 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
59.5%
avg views ÷ 115,706 subscribers
Avg views / post
68,800
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 89 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
89 (28 June 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
1,582,600
Reactions total
48,945
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 18:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
56s
Average length
56s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
160,073 reactions across 89 posts, in 63 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
80,437
50.3%
😭
17,970
11.2%
🤩
7,687
4.80%
🤣
6,309
3.94%
👍
5,002
3.12%
👎
4,777
2.98%
☃
3,444
2.15%
💔
2,925
1.83%
🗿
2,683
1.68%
😡
2,261
1.41%
❤🔥
2,198
1.37%
🤬
2,042
1.28%
🍓
2,021
1.26%
😐
1,673
1.05%
👏
1,477
0.923%
🤨
1,403
0.876%
👌
1,376
0.86%
💯
1,234
0.771%
😢
1,209
0.755%
🕊
1,123
0.702%
43 further kinds
10,822
6.76%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 89 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160,073 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
164
across the posts below
Posts paid on
38
of 89 we hold a reading for · 43%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @s27_team. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 89 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 June 2026 to 9 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (17.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
طلابنا الأعزاء 💗
وفرنـا لكم مجموعة من الجداول الدراسية الخاصة بطلاب
الصباحي والمسائي والخارجي
حتى تنظمون وقتكم وتسيطرون على موادكم بكل سهولة.
اختاروا الجدول المناسب إلكم وابدؤوا من اليوم، وخلّوا هدفكم الاعفاء والمعدل العالي 🤍
📚 نصيحة لطلاب السادس الابتدائي – شلون تسيطرون على مادة الاجتماعيات؟
أعرف أن هواي من طلاب السادس الابتدائي يعتبرون مادة الاجتماعيات صعبة، ويشوفون أن بيها حفظ هواي ومعلومات متشابهة، لكن صدّگوني المادة مو صعبة مثل ما تتصورون، وإنما تحتاج إلى طريقة دراسة صحيحة. ❤️
خلّوني أنطيكم طريقة بسيطة تساعدكم تضبطون المادة:
1️⃣ لا تحفظ الدرس من أول قراءة.
أول شي اقرأ الدرس قراءة كاملة حتى تفهم شنو الموضوع اللي يحچي عنه، وحاول تعرف…
☀️اعادة نشر للفائدة☀️
لكل طالب يخاف من القطعة الخارجية وما يعرف يحلها
هاي نصائح لحل القطعة الخارجية
💗بمادة الانكليزي💗
-بالبداية لازم نعرف ان حل القطعة الخارجية يكون فهمي ، يعني السؤال يعتمد على فهم الطالب و مابي اي حفظ 😇
-كلش مهم ان تكون عدنا معرفة بأساسيات المادة ، يعني قدر الامكان نكون نعرف الافعال والضمائر مثل (i,you,she,he,they,it)
وكذلك الافعال والازمنة مثل past,present simple
هاي الاساسيات كلها تكدرون تفهمو…
مساء الخير يا ابطال 🌝👋🏻💕
شلون تتخلص من ادمان الموبايل والنت وتستخدمهن صح 📱:
شوفوا سچاچة كلنا نستخدم الموبايل لأوقات كثيرة بحياتنا ويجوز توصل ل 8 ساعات باليوم واكثر و الموبايل بهل زمن صار مثل الاكل والشرب بالنسبة لهواي ناس 😄💔 ، فالحل الصحيح هو شلون نستخدم الموبايل بشكل صحيح وليس شلون نتخلص منه 💗
١- نظم وقتك : اول شيء تسوي هو تنظم وقتك من خلال جدول معين تسوي لحياتك و تخلي وقت لكل شيء ، مثلاً تقرا ساعتين بعدها راحة ر…
خميس سعيد سچاچة ❤️👋🏻
نرجع نذكركم بجدول الخميس والجمعة والسبت 💗
اليوم اذا تحبون اخذوا راحة ماكو دراسة الا اذا فقط عدكم تراكمات ادرسوا حتى تخلصوهن قبل ما تتراكم و ماتصير هوسة عليكم 😁🤍
هسة تعالوا انطيكم احسن جدول تخلصون بي واجباتكم من باجر 🤍 :
اول شيء الخميس كون نايمين زين وشبعانين نوم حتى نكعد الجمعة بنشاط كامل 😴💛
تكعدون الصبح ب 9 يوم الجمعة 💞
ريوك لحد 10 وراها تبدون تقرون لحد ساعة 12:30 الظهر 💚
صلاة + غداء + را…
❤1,270🍓112🥱76✍67👎41👏40🤩40❤🔥35
Showing the 12 most recent of 89 posts we hold for @s27_team. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@s27_team edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
7 September 2026
Most recent edit
25 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @s27_team as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
26 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
26 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
7 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مهند الكبيسي مدرس انكليزي 📚 @MohanadAlkubisi94 · 39,003 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 30 August 2026
الأستاذ منتظر الخفاجي @Montather313M · 141,739 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
أ.خالد وليد @khaildwaled · 38,799 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
الاستاذ علي صادق @MATHALI2019 · 343,329 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 10 August 2026
قداوي أبن الحلة Qdawi lbn hilla @mktta_73 · 19,347 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 September 2026
استاذ خامس علمي @stadal5 · 33,453 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 3 September 2026
عمار السلامي @arabiclogati · 59,044 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
الاستاذ احمد الجاف @ahmedjaleell · 75,114 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
الاستاذ عباس علي الغالبي @abbas_ali_2 · 225,072 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 August 2026
الثالث متوسط @wzara · 112,206 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 August 2026
منصة ابن بابل @iraqed4 · 3,206,698 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 8 August 2026
منصة أساس - العراق 🇮🇶 @asas4edu_Iraq · 33,497 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
قناة طلاب العراق الرسمية @soi17 · 491,940 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 August 2026
مرشحات عباس علي الغالبي @adb_3 · 728,801 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 August 2026
اخبار التربية - ابن بابل @iraqed8 · 1,324,054 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 August 2026
مرشحات السادس الابتدائي @stad0ma · 42,540 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 26 August 2026
السادس الابتدائي @EDUQQ · 60,478 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
مرشحات الثالث متوسط @stad3ma · 59,116 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
الاستاذ احمد مهدي شلال عباس المهداوي @ahmedmahdi2019 · 85,127 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
ابن نينوى @ABN_NINAWAA1 · 227,321 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
الاستاذ دانيار فريد الجاف @danyaraljafe · 35,063 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 September 2026
منذر النفاخ/الاجتماعيات @ALNAFAK · 35,164 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
الاستاذ علي الذهبي (مدرس الفيزياء) @alqamf · 73,198 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
المساعد في الثالث المتوسط @ThalthHelp · 223,887 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 55 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تيم السجاجة” (@s27_team), 115,706 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/s27_team.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
