آدم يكول اريد مشرفين مرتبين يمي .

Channel
اقتباسات ستوريات مَشـَاعر •
@YYYYD
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · View velocity · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,713,531subscribers
-1,648 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001302275706 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YYYYD |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YYYYD |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 1,713,531 | -474 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 1,714,005 | -619 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 1,714,624 | -449 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 1,715,073 | -138 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 1,715,211 | +46 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 1,715,165 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 1,715,173 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:49 | 1,715,179 | first reading |
Engagement
837 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.219%
- avg views ÷ 1,713,531 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,750
- 837 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 837
- of 837 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 837 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 837 (17 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,137,340 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 809 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 7of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 14 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 8.18% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 36.5% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 11,300 views — 0.659% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 13,740).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /26281212 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC | 18 minutes – 8 minutes old | 156 viewsno reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /26281112 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC | 110 minutes – 10 minutes old | 1,490 views ~no reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /26281012 Aug 2026, 23:22 UTC | 117 minutes – 17 minutes old | 430 viewsno reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /26280912 Aug 2026, 23:22 UTC | 118 minutes – 18 minutes old | 2,410 views ~no reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /26280812 Aug 2026, 23:14 UTC | 126 minutes – 26 minutes old | 581 viewsno reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /26280712 Aug 2026, 23:14 UTC | 126 minutes – 26 minutes old | 398 viewsno reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /26280612 Aug 2026, 23:06 UTC | 134 minutes – 34 minutes old | 734 viewsno reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /26280512 Aug 2026, 23:05 UTC | 135 minutes – 35 minutes old | 492 viewsno reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 12
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 837 we hold a reading for · 0.1%
- Most on one post
- 12
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @YYYYD. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 837 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
https://t.me/+1IE4-ggwdhJlMDUy
توت مشمش ، سوسه ، توت ، سدن ، نسنس ، ديا ، سوسه ، ساره ، ميس ، فطمي ، زينب ، شهد ، كندر ، و99 أخرون يردوك بلچات حبيبي 🍒
https://t.me/+SbVkDWQSdmw3OWIy
گروب لارين رجع ع الساحه بقيادة نيترو ادام الله ضله ،🚬
https://t.me/+CqqOzDSQamVmZGRi
ايار صاعد اكسبلور وصل صيته لـ درويف نرجع ونكول (يالمالك جذر لا تزعل وي ريح ) ايار ساطي بقيادة تقي وابان دش يروحي 🍓
https://t.me/+W11Bui4iVTpiNGVi
#لافال واحد تلي . دك تفاعل M17#يريدكم بجات دش بويه ونورنا .🍓
https://t.me/+N0xfNwCKmS8xMmJi
تعال اشتركو بالقناه كلشي وكلاشي موجود بيها
محتاجين مشرفين تعالووو
Showing the 12 most recent of 837 posts we hold for @YYYYD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@YYYYD edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 19,811 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@PPPJP · 3,255,955#1
@PPPPJ · 2,362,428#2
@zzzzzz · 1,630,382#3
@zrzzzz · 1,363,781#4
@nnKnn · 1,337,995#5
@deved_iraq · 122,061#6
@llllahll · 118,745#7
@iXiiii · 70,179#8
@voovvo · 64,172#9
@HeB1H1 · 102,665#10
@shabohte · 10,194#11
@oooorooi · 5,944#12
@LLU63 · 22,267#13
@NNNZN · 1,185,827#14
@xoHox · 2,621#15
@hwjeki · 911,830#16
@zx_e4 · 938,248 (as read 8 August 2026)#17
@iii6b · 52,247#18
@nnnnan · 85,520#19
@TJ_H5 · 77,585#20
@iraqed4 · 3,481,793#21
@iraqedu · 4,512,143#22
@lAlMosahfl · 770,523#23
@mlazemna · 1,046,161#24
@L9L9L · 79,156#25
@iT64i · 80,548#26
@Edu211 · 652,395#27
@RN24_IQ · 222,673#28
@errzzl · 546,391#29
@z12zxi · 237,862#30
@XG_64 · 89,963#31
@v999v · 1,585,400#32
@iiPiii · 52,622#33
@santer_sads · 361,840#34
@one_news2026 · 99,699#35
@soi17 · 463,844#36
@TeslaAws · 299,096#37
@edu2iq · 1,195,522#38
@Newton1998 · 397,271#39
@U_1_20 · 1,361#40
@HHHB50H · 52,358#41
@llquraanll · 247,251#42
@alnahraintv · 27,551#43
@SadsHelp · 1,043,001#44
@k4kkk · 352,552#45
@HH_H7S · 279,320#46
@Medical_cours1 · 713,370#47
@hmd2m · 9,630 (as read 8 August 2026)#48
@V_1_V_7 · 2,955#49
@SabrenNewss · 1,129,443#50
@iqresults · 660,362#51
@ntnrr · 181,615#52
@haiderwaleed · 470,961#53
@Gif2022am · 46,274#54
@B_a_r · 142,939#55
@MemesRaqen · 28,393#56
@educationiq · 602,706#57
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@KK_211 · 157,252
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
@PPPJP · 3,255,955
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 8 August 2026
@PPPPJ · 2,362,428
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 8 August 2026
@op_35 · 308,213
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 August 2026
@NNNZN · 1,185,827
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 8 August 2026
@HJAYATT · 494,037
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 9 August 2026
@zrzzzz · 1,363,781
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 8 August 2026
@HRRRRis · 161,057
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 August 2026
@NlNNN · 2,072,251
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 8 August 2026
@zzuzz · 873,089
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 8 August 2026
@zzzzzz · 1,630,382
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 8 August 2026
@nnKnn · 1,337,995
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 8 August 2026
@PVVVV · 811,342
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 8 August 2026
@iaaaaa · 687,865
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 8 August 2026
@TelegramTipsAR · 1,640,132
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 8 August 2026
@en_wk · 1,024,669
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 August 2026
@nvvnnup · 184,225
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
@bbgbb · 187,609
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 11 August 2026
@zz7zz · 495,882
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 11 August 2026
@zr_dt · 304,947
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 10 August 2026
@FN_73 · 161,119
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 12 August 2026
@z12zxi · 237,862
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
@STORYAT_11 · 554,908
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 August 2026
@EN_QE · 845,757
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 78 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اقتباسات ستوريات مَشـَاعر •” (@YYYYD), 1,713,531 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YYYYD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.