Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

عُمر عبدألسّلام

@deved_iraq

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

122,184subscribers

+168 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001380969551
TypeChannel
Username@deved_iraq
Created16 October 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/deved_iraq

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

121,949122,184122,066.56 August 2026 — 122,016 subscribers6 August 2026 — 121,949 subscribers7 August 2026 — 121,992 subscribers9 August 2026 — 122,088 subscribers10 August 2026 — 121,968 subscribers11 August 2026 — 122,061 subscribers12 August 2026 — 122,184 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net +168. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 121,914–122,219 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:56122,184+123
11 Aug 2026, 21:13122,061+93
10 Aug 2026, 22:46121,968-120
9 Aug 2026, 20:53122,088+96
7 Aug 2026, 17:00121,992+43
6 Aug 2026, 14:10121,949-67
6 Aug 2026, 12:45122,016first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.58%
avg views ÷ 122,184 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,700
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held30 (10 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total187,330
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 22 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @deved_iraq. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 21:40 UTC≈4,620 views0 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

Signed ⌯ 𝑶𝒎𝒂𝒓 𝒂𝒃𝒅 𝒂𝒍𝒔𝒂𝒍𝒂𝒎 𖣂 ︎

7 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC≈6,890 viewsread 12 August 2026

يلا تعالو

Signed ⌯ 𝑶𝒎𝒂𝒓 𝒂𝒃𝒅 𝒂𝒍𝒔𝒂𝒍𝒂𝒎 𖣂 ︎

7 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC≈6,760 viewsread 12 August 2026

حفتحلكم بث من الكعبة المشرفة والي يريد يدعي

Signed ⌯ 𝑶𝒎𝒂𝒓 𝒂𝒃𝒅 𝒂𝒍𝒔𝒂𝒍𝒂𝒎 𖣂 ︎

7 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC≈7,760 views0 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

Signed ⌯ 𝑶𝒎𝒂𝒓 𝒂𝒃𝒅 𝒂𝒍𝒔𝒂𝒍𝒂𝒎 𖣂 ︎

6 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC≈7,100 viewsread 12 August 2026

now post in Instagram 📱 https://www.instagram.com/p/DbsNMd0irY0/?igsh=MTg2a3U0eXo3N2ljOA==

Signed ⌯ 𝑶𝒎𝒂𝒓 𝒂𝒃𝒅 𝒂𝒍𝒔𝒂𝒍𝒂𝒎 𖣂 ︎

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @deved_iraq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 228,543 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

تصريفات
@z12zxi · 237,862
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
المُصْحَف
@lAlMosahfl · 770,523
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 August 2026
تمبلر عراقي .
@tumb1riq · 175,838
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
اقتباسات ستوريات مَشـَاعر •
@YYYYD · 1,713,531
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 8 August 2026
اغاني صور افتارات بنات .
@NNNZN · 1,185,827
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 8 August 2026
اقتباسات عبارات ستوريات 0:0
@PPPJP · 3,255,955
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 8 August 2026
قصص عراقية، روايات، واتباد،فصليه
@vv1996 · 235,239
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
ᓭི༏ᓯྀ عبارات اقتباسات ستوريات
@NlNNN · 2,072,251
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 8 August 2026
افتارات اغاني كروبات عاشكها
@PPPPJ · 2,362,428
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 8 August 2026
- أبيات عبارات فصحىَ
@nnKnn · 1,334,512
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 8 August 2026
< Storm - ستورم
@HRRRRis · 161,057
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 August 2026
القرآن الكريم
@llquraanll · 247,251
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 August 2026
علي القريشي • مراجعة الحسم
@O6_40 · 333,410
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
اقوال الامام علي(؏)ادعيه
@FRANKO333 · 413,789
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
𝗡𝘂𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘆 Ϯ🦇.
@bbgbb · 187,609
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 11 August 2026
اشعار اغاني صور بنات خلفيات
@en_wk · 1,024,669
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 August 2026
حُزن عراقي | كأنهُ أنا
@rr_rrora · 184,224
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
- كتابات دوستويفسكي ، اقتباسات حب ، خواطر .
@zrzzzz · 1,363,781
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 8 August 2026
اقتباسات حب ، عبارات حزينه ، ستوريات 🖤 .
@zzzzzz · 1,630,382
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 8 August 2026
القمة وظائف فرص عمل مندوبين
@KK_211 · 157,252
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
اخبار العراق - Iraq News
@Iraq_now3 · 565,451
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 9 August 2026
رأي الناس
@RN24_IQ · 222,673
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 11 August 2026
واحد العراق
@iraq2tv · 406,911
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
الظافر نيوز - AlDHAFIR
@althafer313 · 431,055
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 63 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“عُمر عبدألسّلام” (@deved_iraq), 122,184 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deved_iraq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.