Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 6 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 32 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 93 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 6,208 comparable posts for this entry, running 25 June 2019 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 32, the earliest publisher we hold is @iraqed4 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 31 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
36 measurements spanning 51 days, net -204,452. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,274,311–3,540,099 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 02:39
3,304,979
-28,192
19 Sept 2026, 06:38
3,333,171
-5,296
16 Sept 2026, 19:41
3,338,467
-1,323
14 Sept 2026, 19:16
3,339,790
-2,720
13 Sept 2026, 02:39
3,342,510
-8,529
11 Sept 2026, 02:59
3,351,039
-14,603
8 Sept 2026, 02:17
3,365,642
-13,145
5 Sept 2026, 02:16
3,378,787
-8,154
3 Sept 2026, 09:33
3,386,941
-6,505
2 Sept 2026, 06:08
3,393,446
-3,692
1 Sept 2026, 09:08
3,397,138
-3,706
31 Aug 2026, 11:33
3,400,844
-4,408
30 Aug 2026, 12:56
3,405,252
-4,590
29 Aug 2026, 12:18
3,409,842
-3,084
28 Aug 2026, 14:13
3,412,926
-3,650
27 Aug 2026, 13:44
3,416,576
-3,350
26 Aug 2026, 15:23
3,419,926
-5,002
25 Aug 2026, 14:17
3,424,928
-5,513
24 Aug 2026, 12:05
3,430,441
-8,466
22 Aug 2026, 18:58
3,438,907
first reading
Engagement
24,098 posts held, back to 25 June 2019 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 5,267 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.1%
avg views ÷ 3,304,979 subscribers
Avg views / post
763,000
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 24,098 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 33 of 42 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held
24,098 (25 June 2019 – 28 September 2026)
Views total
32,058,000
Reactions total
0
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Sept 2026, 19:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7,720
Videos
≈650
Links
≈6,470
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6m 46s
Average length
58s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 35 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 31 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 31 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 26.1% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 56.0% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 318,000 views — 9.62% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 423,000).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1,862
across the posts below
Posts paid on
54
of 992 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1,290
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @iraqed4. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 October 2025 to 28 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
مستلزمات الطالب كاملة من قرطاسية وملازم والدورات الالكترونية كلشي يخص الطالب تلكو عند مكتبة ابن بابل – كربلاء المقدسة، مجاور جامعة الزهراء للبنات
المؤظفين باقين اليوم للساعة ١٢ علمود يجهزوكم بكامل طلباتكم
عاجل
مجلس الوزراء يقرر تعطيل الدوام الرسمي في مؤسسات الدولة ابتداءً من يوم الأربعاء المصادف 30 أيلول ولغاية يوم السبت 3 تشرين الأول المقبل، احتفاءً (بأيام السيادة) لجمهورية العراق
https://t.me/iraqed4
Showing the 12 most recent of 24,098 posts we hold for @iraqed4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 October 2025 to 28 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
20
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
20
vacant every time we have ever looked
@iraqed4 named 20 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@iraqed3 named in 84 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@make_up79 named in 66 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@mohesr_official_channel2 named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@iraaed4 named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@luayhameedeng named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@zano_mohamedbot named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@komash15 named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@komash1bot named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@lraqi_edu2 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@iraqed00 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@ipn_babrll_kro named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@martaza791bot named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@mohammadhassoon named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@ha77ge named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@play21 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@tl20037c named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@tooooofe1 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@tv_ashor named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@iraqed7 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@elite_zayouna_institute named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
اخبار العراق @tqwemiq · 24,515 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 15 September 2026
ملازم الثالث متوسط 2027 @m3h8m · 25,494 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
الاستاذ دانيار فريد الجاف @danyaraljafe · 28,748 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 September 2026
قناة اخبار وزارة التربية العراقية @Iraqi_EDU_2018 · 28,209 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 September 2026
خذ لقلبك مايرويه @yamahdimdd3133 · 28,684 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
ابن نينوى @Snn_2027 · 158,806 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 8 September 2026
اندي @anoudy9 · 31,561 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 6 September 2026
رياكشنات🤎🇮🇶 @msra52 · 51,165 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 31 August 2026
قناة التربوي الاخبارية @aaer7 · 44,364 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
أ.خالد وليد @khaildwaled · 39,455 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
عمار السلامي @arabiclogati · 57,330 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
ابن الموصل || طلاب العراق @Al_mosal · 58,001 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 18 here — alongside 17 others — read 22 August 2026
طلاب العراق - علي السورجي @iraq_2016 · 61,395 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
الاستاذ احمد الجاف @ahmedjaleell · 66,524 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
الطالب العراقي @eduiiq · 77,122 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
الاستاذ علي الذهبي (مدرس الفيزياء) 2026 @alqamf · 73,462 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
باسم الكربلائي 𝗕𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗺 𝗞𝗮𝗿𝗯𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗲𝗶 @bk_B4 · 90,021 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
تيم السجاجة @s24_team · 102,363 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 August 2026
📚مرشحات ابن كربلاء 📚 @ooiq2 · 104,120 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
شبكة بابليون @babilcom · 137,976 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
الأستاذ منتظر الخفاجي @Montather313M · 139,523 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
اخبار طلاب العراق @z3_w7 · 161,176 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 12 August 2026
شباب وبنات شارع 40 @street40 · 197,518 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 11 August 2026
اخبار وزارة التربية والتعليم العالي @iraqulu · 224,114 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 628 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
15 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“منصة ابن بابل” (@iraqed4), 3,304,979 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iraqed4.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
