Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
125,000 average views per post against 22,550 subscribers — an engagement rate of 556.2%. Across the 4,836 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,004–31,619 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 2.98% and 14.2%, with a median of 7.18%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
93 of 93 published in the window (0 exact, 93 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
11,664,500
Mature posts only
654.7% over 64 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net -1,019,125. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 14:08
23,326
+395
8 Nov 2026, 22:16
22,931
+470
7 Nov 2026, 15:55
22,461
+242
6 Nov 2026, 11:57
22,219
+128
5 Nov 2026, 13:31
22,091
-459
4 Nov 2026, 11:26
22,550
+139
3 Nov 2026, 11:40
22,411
+19,476
31 Oct 2026, 18:29
2,935
+1,673
28 Oct 2026, 14:55
1,262
-1,075,802
27 Oct 2026, 15:17
1,077,064
+2,140
26 Oct 2026, 16:01
1,074,924
+2,966
25 Oct 2026, 15:16
1,071,958
+2,489
24 Oct 2026, 15:06
1,069,469
+1,496
23 Oct 2026, 18:08
1,067,973
+2,253
22 Oct 2026, 20:48
1,065,720
+1,961
21 Oct 2026, 17:35
1,063,759
+3,564
20 Oct 2026, 11:26
1,060,195
+3,631
19 Oct 2026, 11:51
1,056,564
+2,382
18 Oct 2026, 12:46
1,054,182
+707
17 Oct 2026, 16:16
1,053,475
first reading
Engagement
330 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 181 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
543.5%
avg views ÷ 23,326 subscribers
Avg views / post
127,000
76 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
76
of 330 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 76 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026
Posts held
330 (29 July 2026 – 27 October 2026)
Views total
9,635,300
Reactions total
0
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Oct 2026, 08:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 15s
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 82 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 48 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 13 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 25.6% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 62.7% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 85,900 views — 7.98% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 107,000).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
60 minutes: 14,929 interp. → 3.0 hours: 31,400 → 6.0 hours: 48,700 → 12 hours: 51,400still climbing at last reading
not yet at 24h
2.8 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
86
across the posts below
Posts paid on
27
of 330 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
34
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SadsHelp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 330 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 27 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 45 of 76 posts held from the last 30 days (59.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#تنويه 🔔
🔵 القرار يشمل كل من :
🔤طلاب السادس الابتدائي والثالث المتوسط والسادس الإعدادي بفرعيه
🔤طلاب الخارجي وطلاب المدارس المسائية
شبكة المساعد التعليمية 👍
الرابط: t.me/SadsHelp
▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️
👉 القناة🖤🌎 الموقع🖤 🤖 البوت
🏛 المكتبة🖤👥 الكروب🖤📧 التواصل
#عاجل ❗️
🔵مجلس الوزراء:
تستوفي وزارة التربية مبلغ (25) ألف دينار عن كل مادة يمتحن فيها الطالب في الدور الثالث
شبكة المساعد التعليمية 👍
الرابط: t.me/SadsHelp
▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️
👉 القناة🖤🌎 الموقع🖤 🤖 البوت
🏛 المكتبة🖤👥 الكروب🖤📧 التواصل
#عاجل ⚠️
بناء على مقترح وزير التربية.. مجلس الوزراء يوافق على إجراء الدور الثالث للمراحل المنتهية
وافق مجلس الوزراء على إجراء امتحانات الدور الثالث للعام الدراسي2025–2026، بناء على مقترح وزير التربية، لطلبة السادس الابتدائي والثالث المتوسط والسادس الإعدادي بفروعه كافة.
شبكة المساعد التعليمية 👍
الرابط: t.me/SadsHelp
▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️
👉 القناة🖤🌎 الموقع🖤 🤖 البوت
🏛 المكتبة🖤👥 الكروب🖤📧 التواصل
مهم جداً بعد قليل
انتظرونا ..
شبكة المساعد التعليمية 👍
الرابط: t.me/SadsHelp
▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️
👉 القناة🖤🌎 الموقع🖤 🤖 البوت
🏛 المكتبة🖤👥 الكروب🖤📧 التواصل
#عاجل ❗️
🔵 مجلس النواب العراقي:
🔤 سوف يتم متابعة موضوع الانتساب للطلبة
شبكة المساعد التعليمية 👍
الرابط: t.me/SadsHelp
▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️
👉 القناة🖤🌎 الموقع🖤 🤖 البوت
🏛 المكتبة🖤👥 الكروب🖤📧 التواصل
هذا جزء بسيط من رسائلكم اللي نعتز ونفتخر بيها... كلماتكم الحلوة ودعواتكم الصادقة هي أكبر دافع إلنا حتى نستمر ونقدّم الأفضل إلكم..
فرحتنا مو بس بنجاح المبادرات، فرحتنا الحقيقية من نشوف أثرها عليكم ونسمع آراءكم وتجاربكم شكراً من القلب على ثقتكم ومحبتكم، ووعد منّا نبقى دائماً سند إلكم بكل خطوة من مشواركم الدراسي...💜💜
للحجز و الاستفسار تواصل معنا ✉️
https://t.me/Iraqedu_Portal1
بوابة المساعد | AL MOSAED PORTAL
https:/…
#عاجل ❗️
🔵 لجنة التربية النيابية: ضرورة منح طلبة الصفوف المنتهية في المراحل الدراسية كافة الدور الثالث للعام الدراسي (2025–2026) مراعاة للظروف التي واجهها الطلبة وحرصاً على مستقبلهم الدراسي مع التأكيد على توجيه كتاب عاجل إلى الأمانة العامة لمجلس الوزراء يتضمن طلب إدراج الموضوع ضمن جدول أعمال جلسة مجلس الوزراء المقبلة للتصويت عليه
🔤 لجنة التربية النيابية توصي بإعادة النظر في قرار إلزام طلبة الانتساب بالاشتراك في ال…
#عاجل ❗️
🔵 لجنة التربية النيابية تطالب بإلغاء استحصال أي مبالغ مالية مقابل انتساب الطلبة، فالتعليم حق للجميع وليس عبئاً على العائلات
شبكة المساعد التعليمية 👍
الرابط: t.me/SadsHelp
▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️
👉 القناة🖤🌎 الموقع🖤 🤖 البوت
🏛 المكتبة🖤👥 الكروب🖤📧 التواصل
#عاجل ❗️
🔵 لجنة التربية النيابية تصوت رسمياً على :
🔤 الغاء اجور الانتساب وترفع توصية الى وزارة التربية
🔤تم رفع كتاب رسمي للتأكيد على مجلس الوزراء لمنح الدور الثالث
شبكة المساعد التعليمية 👍
الرابط: t.me/SadsHelp
▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️
👉 القناة🖤🌎 الموقع🖤 🤖 البوت
🏛 المكتبة🖤👥 الكروب🖤📧 التواصل
#عاجل ❗️
🔵 لجنة التربية النيابية : تمت مناقشة موضوع الغاء اجور الانتساب ورفع التوصية الى وزارة التربية.
شبكة المساعد التعليمية 👍
الرابط: t.me/SadsHelp
▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️
👉 القناة🖤🌎 الموقع🖤 🤖 البوت
🏛 المكتبة🖤👥 الكروب🖤📧 التواصل
Showing the 12 most recent of 330 posts we hold for @SadsHelp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@SadsHelp edited 15 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
22 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 23 posts on @SadsHelp as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
20 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
24 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
26 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
10
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
شنو أكثر مادة تحسون محتاجين بيها امتحانات واختبارات مستمرة حتى تضبطوها ⚠️؟
التربية الإسلامية 🕋11%
اللغة العربية 📖17%
اللغة الانكليزية 🗽17%
الرياضيات 🧮22%
الاحياء 🧬23%
الكيمياء 🧪19%
الفيزياء 💡30%
محتاجين امتحانات لكل المواد بدون استثناء ☑️41%
The shares total 180%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 330 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 27 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
قناة المساعد الجامعية 🎓 @IraqiUni · 63,471 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
المساعد في السادس الاعدادي @SadsNote · 62,573 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
شبكة سطور التعليمية @sotor_app · 87,299 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 August 2026
منتدى المساعد التعليمي @IraqEduForum · 218,714 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
المساعد في الثالث المتوسط @ThalthHelp · 223,887 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
شبكة يلا ندرس @yallandrs · 204,284 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
الاستاذ عصام الشمري @Esam_6 · 65,963 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 August 2026
شبكة صنّاع الٲمل التعليمية @IRAQEDU2019 · 93,750 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
ملخصات السادس 2027 @MMMK_1 · 56,368 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 August 2026
معهد استاذ عقيل الزبيدي @aqil_99 · 54,962 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
مفتاح السادس - Sixth Key @S2SiQ · 70,541 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
دار الاعرجي @daralaarji · 109,280 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
سالم ال منصور @Salimalmansour98bio · 239,483 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
منصة أينشتاين للتعليم @iraqdeu1 · 284,447 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
شبكة ملازمنا @mlazemna · 1,092,287 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 August 2026
مرشحات السادس علمي @stad6ma · 38,753 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
الأستاذ حسن عبد الكاظم الربيعي @hassanphy6 · 39,912 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
رابط @ss_adds · 140 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
ابن نينوى @ABN_NINAWAA1 · 227,321 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
تسلا للتعليم | Tesla @TeslaAws · 303,134 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 August 2026
أ. مصطفى النعيمي . فيزياء @drmustafaphyscis · 42,197 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
kasbar33 @kasbar33 · 3 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
شبكة السوادس | AL-SWADES @EZZZ22ZZ · 57,739 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
أ. مصطفى الحافظ @mbio111 · 76,434 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 183 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شبكة المساعد التعليمية | IRAQEDU” (@SadsHelp), 23,326 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SadsHelp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.