Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

هاجر حامد / English

@hajerEnglish

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,712subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001809340324
TypeChannel
Username@hajerEnglish
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hajerEnglish

Growth

1,7051,7121,708.57 August 2026 — 1,705 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,708 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,712 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,704–1,713 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 04:531,712+4
7 Aug 2026, 08:351,708+3
7 Aug 2026, 06:311,705first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.9%
avg views ÷ 1,712 subscribers
Avg views / post
974
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held26 (29 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total24,338
Reactions total675
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

675 reactions across 25 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍27640.9%
21131.3%
💯507.41%
👏294.30%
🔥243.56%
💘131.93%
🤩111.63%
101.48%
🫡101.48%
🥰91.33%
🍓81.19%
👌71.04%
👨‍💻60.889%
🤯30.444%
🙏20.296%
🤗20.296%
10.148%
❤‍🔥10.148%
🏆10.148%
😁10.148%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 675reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC174 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

هذه الملزمة اللي نشرح عليها بيها اليونت الاول والثاني

👍8🙏1

Signed Hajer Hamed

7 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC319 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

اليوم نمتحن بالفديو الاول (الرغبة وعدم الرغبة) باجر نمتحن بالتفضيل ايضا ب 9 بالليل

15👍5😁1

Signed Hajer Hamed

7 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC325 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

وشرحنة موضوع التفضيل وهذا شرح الموضوع https://youtu.be/dZbcI_IhnDM?si=eVX7Q-QsaAQK78TM

6🔥1

Signed Hajer Hamed

7 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC336 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

شرحنة اليوم موضوع افعال الرغبة وعدم الرغبة وهذا شرح الموضوع https://youtu.be/2pyMXg0GtnE?si=LAtFq1SmSpFAdhpa

8👍2

Signed Hajer Hamed

7 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC421 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

محاضرة ادخلوا https://meet.google.com/xqs-ifop-yhu

8👍5

Signed Hajer Hamed

7 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC473 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

تذكير عدنة محاضرة ساعة 5:30

👍233👏2

Signed Hajer Hamed

5 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC≈1,000 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

شرح اليونت الاول بالكامل مقسم على 3 فديوات فقط الجزء الاول🖤 https://youtu.be/183TWb2E2YY?si=_4SYS6ba1AxurL8J الجزء الثاني💜 https://youtu.be/QF-OK9gfmNw?si=AU4qNxPfeIekWTLN الجزء الثالث❤️ https://youtu.be/w48B_7SVTsg?si=uBXyLcw63b4FbiKd

19👍3🥰3💘1

Signed Hajer Hamed

5 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC836 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

خلصنة اليوم اليونت الاول بالكامل نمتحن بي يوم الاثنين 1️⃣راح انزل الكم 3 محاضرات تحتوي على شرح اليونت الاول بالكامل ميحتاج تقرون غيرهن لان شارحة كل اليونت بهذه الفديوات 2️⃣ ناخذ محاضرة يوم الجمعة ويوم الاحد عادي حتى نمشي بالمادة 3️⃣ اليوم ماعدنة اي كوز يومي

👍216🥰3🤯2

Signed Hajer Hamed

5 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC786 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

حلينة تمارين المراجعة صفحة 20 بكتاب النشاط https://youtu.be/A9ZcnisPxkE?si=TleSs8Ajvw9d10PX

👏5🍓21

Signed Hajer Hamed

5 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC725 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

حلينة اسئلة القصة الموجودة بكتاب النشاط https://youtu.be/E_5-HS7l1ao?si=DBZeUXQXvuZawOcZ

👏72🍓2

Signed Hajer Hamed

5 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC705 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

شرحنة اليوم قصة اليونت الاول بعنوان الزبون المحظوظ وهذه القصة https://youtu.be/9CSE8i_r3Vg?si=c2BxVUeFn7dCny1Y

👍8🍓21👏1

Signed Hajer Hamed

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @hajerEnglish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jul 2026, 20:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz278 voters

He is stupid

  1. He is very clever30%
  2. He is a bit clever26%
  3. He is not very clever44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jul 2026, 19:59 UTCAnonymous Quiz254 voters

She is ugly

  1. She is not very good-looking60%
  2. She is very good-looking23%
  3. She is a bit ugly17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jul 2026, 19:57 UTCAnonymous Quiz243 voters

He can't sing. He isn't.........

  1. He isn't very good at singing57%
  2. He isn't very good at sing28%
  3. He is very good at singing15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jul 2026, 19:56 UTCAnonymous Quiz232 voters

She is short. (Make the sentence more polite)

  1. She is a bit tall30%
  2. She is very tall20%
  3. She is not very tall50%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jul 2026, 19:54 UTCAnonymous Quiz241 voters

He can't swim. He can't.............

  1. He can't swimming very well53%
  2. He can't swim very well47%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jul 2026, 19:52 UTCAnonymous Quiz243 voters

She is boring (Re-write the sentence in a more polite way)

  1. She is not boring28%
  2. She is not very much fun58%
  3. She is very much fun13%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 49,314 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“هاجر حامد / English” (@hajerEnglish), 1,712 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hajerEnglish.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.