مطلوب فقط بنات ولد تنطرد 👆

Channel
نسمات قرآنية
@ff313n
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,324subscribers
-177 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001976564373 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ff313n |
| Description | واهمسُ لقلبُك همسًـا خفيفًا لا تخشَ شيئًا إنَ اللّٰه معك . لـ طلّب التمويل : @goph_88 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ff313n |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 30,324 | -52 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 30,376 | -11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 30,387 | -36 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 30,423 | -24 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 30,447 | -49 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 30,496 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 30,501 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 30,501 | first reading |
Engagement
145 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.44%
- avg views ÷ 30,324 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,350
- 145 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 145
- of 145 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 145 (24 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 195,203 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 353
- Videos
- 23
- Links
- 188
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 12s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
شغل للبنات بلبيت👨💻.
صدرية مدرسية بتصميم رهيببب💅🔥
فـُستان للحفلات و المناسبات 🦄🔥🔥.
قميص العصر الفيكتوري للدوام 💋
القميص الترند 😍
فـُستان سندريَلا 🫲🎀.
اخر ١٠ هنا
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
اول سبعة الهم مميز🩵🩵
📶📶كل اللي فاتحين التليجرام هسه محظوظين 🟢 دقائق ونحذف رابط https://t.me/m_1448/227 اشـتركوا فهي فرصة لكم 🤍
Showing the 12 most recent of 145 posts we hold for @ff313n. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,051,419 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@fashio369 · 2,43827 postsمـَكْتَبَة بُــن || Bon Library
@Bon_Library · 9,48317 postsحَـوراء.
@Me90cn · 10,31812 postsازياء تولاي للملابس 🛍️369
@afyvib · 4,34710 postsShein💕.
@ZllA76 · 39,7316 posts𝙰𝚈𝙾
@Ayooty20 · 17,2035 postsعَ
@abasbasheer1 · 3333 postsالقرآن الكريم
@llquraanll · 247,2513 postsبرونز 🌹
@bronz91e · 4,9262 postsـ خُّطى الشُّهَدَاءِ ـ
@m_1448 · 1682 postsازَيـاءْ شَمُـس 💜"
@shames_6 · 11,7381 postرَجَاءُ المتَّقِينَ .
@sirccq · 22,3601 postذكاء اصطناعي .
@thol28 · 9,0531 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@huditi2017 · 180,835
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
@ali11041 · 247,001
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
@imamhussain_ar · 154,031
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
@FRANKO333 · 413,789
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نسمات قرآنية” (@ff313n), 30,324 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ff313n.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.