National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net -7,145. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 88,903–98,192 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 14:17
89,975
-271
19 Sept 2026, 04:01
90,246
-489
16 Sept 2026, 20:18
90,735
-365
15 Sept 2026, 01:38
91,100
-81
13 Sept 2026, 10:01
91,181
-953
11 Sept 2026, 13:16
92,134
-654
8 Sept 2026, 21:00
92,788
-583
5 Sept 2026, 11:01
93,371
-19
3 Sept 2026, 15:56
93,390
-55
2 Sept 2026, 10:27
93,445
-55
1 Sept 2026, 10:34
93,500
-279
31 Aug 2026, 07:06
93,779
-80
30 Aug 2026, 06:48
93,859
-48
29 Aug 2026, 07:34
93,907
-18
28 Aug 2026, 09:08
93,925
-36
27 Aug 2026, 05:39
93,961
-46
26 Aug 2026, 06:44
94,007
-193
25 Aug 2026, 04:34
94,200
-62
24 Aug 2026, 00:18
94,262
-93
22 Aug 2026, 06:09
94,355
first reading
Engagement
1,449 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 116 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.15%
avg views ÷ 89,975 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,040
727 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
727
of 1,449 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 716 of 727 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held
1,449 (5 August 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total
754,919
Reactions total
57,283
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Oct 2026, 00:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈17,700
Videos
≈23,300
Links
≈44,200
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
7h 01m
Average length
56s
Measured directly from 451 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
74,705 reactions across 986 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
31,463
42.1%
❤
16,836
22.5%
🔥
7,527
10.1%
🙏
3,671
4.91%
😁
2,717
3.64%
🫡
2,647
3.54%
🤡
2,440
3.27%
🤬
1,826
2.44%
🤮
1,077
1.44%
🤔
961
1.29%
❤🔥
780
1.04%
💊
728
0.974%
👎
438
0.586%
😱
417
0.558%
💯
298
0.399%
🤣
279
0.373%
😢
224
0.3%
👏
180
0.241%
🖕
66
0.088%
😭
52
0.07%
4 further kinds
78
0.104%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 989 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74,705 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 24 August 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @russiafirstchanel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 24 August 2026 to 1 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Путин: мы скоро все будем ездить на китайских машинах
Автомобильная промышленность Европы находится в глубоком кризисе, ее предприятия закрываются, скоро все будут ездить на китайских машинах, заявил президент РФ.
"Глубокий кризис: где автомобильная промышленность Европы? Предприятия закрываются. Скоро все будем ездить на китайских машинах. Хорошо это или плохо, не знаю, но дешево и качественно", - сказал Путин на …
Только за сентябрь Россия поставила под контроль 1301 квадратный километр в зоне СВО - это в два с половиной раза больше, чем в предыдущие месяцы, заявил Путин.
Темп движения российских войск нарастает, подчеркнул президент.
Другие заявления:
🔹Нейтральный статус Украины остается целью России.
🔹России хотелось бы как можно быстрее прекратить боевые действия на Украине с помощью переговоров.
🔹На саммите в Анкоридж…
🇷🇺 Нурмагомеду Гаджимагомедову могло бы исполниться 30 лет: история первого Героя России на СВО
Нурмагомеду Гаджимагомедову могло бы исполниться 30 лет. Жизнь уроженца Дагестана оборвалась в феврале 2022 года. Вместе с однополчанами он выполнял боевое задание, когда оказался в окружении противника. Спасая товарищей, старший лейтенант гвардии подорвал себя и солдат ВСУ последней гранатой. Он стал первым Героем России…
Путин — об отношениях с Китаем, США, Европой и ядерных силах: главное
Главные заявления:
О Китае и Си Цзиньпине
Путин рассказал, как они с Си Цзиньпином остались вдвоём — без переводчиков — и понимали друг друга без слов. Президент также отметил, что его внуки говорят на китайском языке. Позже он добавил: им с Си Цзиньпином и Трампом будет труднее понять друг друга без слов, чем во время общения только с китайским…
Если речь дойдет до прямого нападения на Россию, в повестке дня неизбежно и немедленно появится вопрос о применении всех имеющихся вооружений, заявил Путин.
Заявление МИД о возможности защиты Калининграда в том числе ядерным оружием - не запугивание, а ответ на попытку запугать Россию, подчеркнул глава государства.
Что еще сказал президент:
🔹Таких средств поражения, которые сегодня есть у России, ни у кого нет.
🔹…
"Если ружье висит на стене, то в конце-концов оно должно выстрелить"
Нет гарантий того, что ядерные державы не прибегнут к использованию ядерного оружия, заявил Путин.
Другие заявления:
🔹Момент, когда ничего уже нельзя будет изменить, может наступить очень быстро и неожиданно для всех.
🔹Политика эскалации боевых действий и санкций никогда не бывает односторонней, на разрушительные шаги одной стороны всегда следуе…
Прямо сейчас Владимир Путин выступает на пленарной сессии XXIII ежегодного заседания Международного дискуссионного клуба «Валдай»
Главные заявления президента:
🔹Мир подошел к решающему поворотному моменту развития, дело не только в политике.
🔹 Всем в мире рано или поздно предстоит договариваться о принципах нового мироустройства.
🔹 Тенденции на мировой арене заставляют задуматься о том, как сохранить глобальный м…
На Украине к мужчине приехали двое представителей закона — явно с намерением задержать. Но вот незадача: судя по их глазам, правонарушителем тут явно является кто-то другой
😄 — чтобы поймать преступника, нужно самому стать преступником
РОССИЯ|Предложить новость| Чат| Читать нас в MAX
В Госдуме предложили обязать работодателей оборудовать в офисах специальные комнаты для детей. Авторы считают, что это не только удобно для мам, но и станет дополнительным преимуществом для самих работодателей.
Нужны ли детские комнаты в офисах?
Да, это очень удобно48%
Нет, это лишнее35%
Затрудняюсь ответить17%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Коллективные силы ОДКБ отработали штурм на учениях «Взаимодействие-2026»
На учениях «Взаимодействие-2026» Коллективные силы ОДКБ провели показательный штурм позиций условного противника. Атака началась одновременно с нескольких направлений: штурмовые отряды при поддержке FPV-дронов последовательно заняли опорные пункты и закрепились на новых рубежах.
«Противнику» не дали перегруппироваться. Используя данные воздушн…
Водитель из Таджикистана стал героем дня
Во Владивостоке водителя из Таджикистана Юсуфа Каюмова называют героем дня. Благодаря его решительности последствия серьёзной аварии в районе улицы Спиридонова удалось предотвратить.
Сегодня во Владивостоке произошло массовое ДТП. У грузовика Isuzu Forward при спуске по улице Спиридонова отказали тормоза. Машина протаранила несколько автомобилей и автобус, пока не врезалась …
91 год — и всё ещё на старте: питерский бегун, который отмерил ногами четыре экватора
Поверите? 91-летний мужчина выходит на старт марафона «Белые ночи» и говорит: «Пока я в состоянии — бег не брошу».
Мы продолжаем рассказывать о людях, так или иначе связанных с нашим городом. Сегодня — о Михаиле Гершмане.
Михаил Бенционович Гершман, петербуржец, родился в 1935-м. Его жизнь почти совпала с послевоенной историей го…
❤122🙏17👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,449 posts we hold for @russiafirstchanel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@russiafirstchanel edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 273 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
В Госдуме предложили обязать работодателей оборудовать в офисах специальные комнаты для детей. Авторы считают, что это не только удобно для мам, но и станет дополнительным преимуществом для самих работодателей.
Нужны ли детские комнаты в офисах?
Да, это очень удобно48%
Нет, это лишнее35%
Затрудняюсь ответить17%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
1 октября - День Сухопутных войск в России
Какой храм является главным храмом Сухопутных войск?
Храм Христа Спасителя6%
Храм Преображения Господня на Преображенской площади24%
Главный храм Вооружённых Сил РФ в парке «Патриот»67%
Исаакиевский собор4%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 24 August 2026 to 1 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ПЕРВЫЙ ИНФОРМАЦИОННЫЙ @firstinform1 · 77,469 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 12 September 2026
Ведомство @vedomstvo_rf · 29,875 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 7 September 2026
Russian Lives Matter | RLM 🇷🇺 @russianlivenews · 25,496 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 16 September 2026
Прямой Эфир @ROSSIA_PUTIN · 65,814 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
War Zone | Zона Vойны @warzone_Z · 19,940 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 29 September 2026
Такер Карлсон в России @TuckerKarIson · 19,962 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 September 2026
Кедми в Telegram | Главное @yak0v_kedmi · 20,818 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 September 2026
Мировая Телега Новостей | Украина Россия Курск @novosti_voyny · 20,817 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 29 September 2026
Россия / Russia @russia · 34,368 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026
СРОЧНЫЕ НОВОСТИ 🅥 @novosti_24_ru · 37,020 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 September 2026
Путин Лайф @putin_life · 26,181 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
Fox News Russia @Putin_tramp_mobilizaciya_migrant · 267,216 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Русский Пират @russ_pirat · 33,034 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Что говорят? @chto_gov · 57,109 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 September 2026
Трэшовый @trashovynews · 34,042 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 25 September 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“РОССИЯ” (@russiafirstchanel), 89,975 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russiafirstchanel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.