Channel
@anonbible
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
127subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001129554271 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anonbible |
| Description | **We Do Not Forget** |
| Created | 25 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anonbible |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 127 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 127 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 18 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2022 to 19 August 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
MTG: The Republican Party is only worthy of your vote if we are willing to stand up and stop horrific things like child abuse, like so-called “gender affirming care” which is really genital mutilation and chemical castration… teenage girls actually having their breasts chopped off, teenage boys being castrated
The Pit: A Story in Three Acts https://rumble.com/v1gio65-the-pit-a-story-in-three-acts.html
https://theoptimisticconservative.wordpress.com/2022/08/13/two-pings-on-the-fbi-raid-on-mar-a-lago-classification-kerfuffle-and-trumps-rico-suit/
A former FBI special agent speculated that the Department of Justice may have pushed hard for the bureau to raid Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort earlier this month and implied they did so at the behest of the Biden administration. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11126003/Ex-FBI-special-agent-says-Bidens-Department-Justice-pushed-hard-Bureau-raid-Mar-Lago.html
JUST IN - Trump CFO Weisselberg pleads guilty in tax fraud case and agrees to testify against Trump's organization. https://www.disclose.tv/id/1560277540438446088/ @disclosetv
If we do not stand up and fight to protect our children, we stand for nothing. We do not fight because we hate our enemies, it is because we love our Creator, our families, our communities and our country. These corrupt judges should go straight to the darkest recesses of Hell. https://apnews.com/article/crime-trending-news-government-and-politics-6f30f575dc739415af1e5b47b1be50f0
Posted without readable text
The Trump search warrant was never about classified materials. The statutes cited in the warrant allow for prosecution even if none of the documents are classified. A former President persecuted for having records relating to his administration. While the Biden DOJ certainly desires prosecuting Trump, there’s an alternative we must consider - that they want to damage him politically ahead of 2024.
👍1
Think about just how despicable of a “news” outlet you have to be to attack a mother of 6 daughters who is trying to help human trafficking victims. Once again, the Left ties any sort of human trafficking awareness to the make-believe “QAnon”. Why is it that liberals and Democrats are so against human trafficking awareness? 🤔
https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/durham-0
The Pit: A Story in Three Acts https://rumble.com/v1gio65-the-pit-a-story-in-three-acts.html
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @anonbible. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The AnonBible” (@anonbible), 127 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anonbible.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.