🚨 CARLOS ESPI AGAIN! HIS 4TH GOAL OF THE NIGHT AND 2 ASSISTS!
👍78🔥23❤7👏2
Signed Sheldon

Channel
@real_madrid_en
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,838subscribers
-124 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001742647366 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @real_madrid_en |
| Description | Real Madrid English News Telegram Channel. ⛔️𝐃𝐈𝐒𝐂𝐋𝐀𝐈𝐌𝐄𝐑:- 𝐖𝐞 𝐝𝐨𝐧'𝐭 Own 𝐀𝐧𝐲𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐖𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞! 🧑💻@sheldon52 Buy ads: https://telega.io/c/real_madrid_en Media Channel: https://t.me/realmadridmedia1 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/real_madrid_en |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 24,838 | -16 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 24,854 | -32 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 24,886 | +28 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 24,858 | -52 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:39 | 24,910 | +6 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:20 | 24,904 | +170 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:19 | 24,734 | -43 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 24,777 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:26 | 24,778 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:22 | 24,784 | -18 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 24,802 | -19 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 24,821 | -29 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 24,850 | -22 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 24,872 | -16 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 24,888 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 24,892 | -27 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 24,919 | -17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 24,936 | -38 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 24,974 | +56 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 24,918 | first reading |
461 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 461 (6 August 2026 – 1 October 2026) |
| Views total | 105,447 |
| Reactions total | 4,131 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 09:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
33,223 reactions across 459 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 14,459 | 43.5% | |
| ❤ | 12,526 | 37.7% | |
| 👍 | 3,134 | 9.43% | |
| 🤣 | 701 | 2.11% | |
| 🤯 | 367 | 1.10% | |
| 👎 | 334 | 1.01% | |
| 💔 | 224 | 0.674% | |
| 😁 | 208 | 0.626% | |
| 👏 | 191 | 0.575% | |
| ❤🔥 | 173 | 0.521% | |
| 🕊 | 133 | 0.4% | |
| 🥰 | 128 | 0.385% | |
| 🫡 | 98 | 0.295% | |
| 😱 | 73 | 0.22% | |
| 💩 | 63 | 0.19% | |
| 🖕 | 63 | 0.19% | |
| 🤬 | 51 | 0.154% | |
| 🤮 | 51 | 0.154% | |
| 🎉 | 40 | 0.12% | |
| 😢 | 33 | 0.099% | |
| 21 further kinds | 173 | 0.521% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 459 of the 461 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33,223 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 461 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @real_madrid_en. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 461 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 1 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚨 CARLOS ESPI AGAIN! HIS 4TH GOAL OF THE NIGHT AND 2 ASSISTS!
👍78🔥23❤7👏2
Signed Sheldon
HAT-TRICK FOR SPAIN U21! ⭐️🇪🇸
❤68🔥16👍5
Signed Sheldon
🚨💣 UEFA OFFICIAL STATEMENT: “UEFA can confirm that it has received from Real Madrid CF a SUBSTANTIAL amount of documents related to the ongoing investigation into FC Barcelona in the matter involving José María Enríquez NEGREIRA, former vice-president of the Technical Committee of Referees of the Royal Spanish Football Federation (the so-called "Negreira case"). UEFA's Ethics and Disciplinary Inspectors have also r…
❤20👍4🔥1
Signed Sam
Our club will continue to actively collaborate with UEFA and take all actions within its power to clarify events that it considers incompatible with the principles of integrity, transparency and fair play that should govern European football.”
❤26👍3
Signed Sam
🚨💣 REAL MADRID OFFICIAL STATEMENT: “In response to the statement made today by UEFA regarding the so-called “Negreira case”, Real Madrid CF states the following: UEFA has confirmed receipt of the complaint filed by Real Madrid CF and the continuation of the investigation into payments made over the last two decades by FC Barcelona to the former vice-president of the Technical Committee of Referees. The complaint f…
❤24👍4
Signed Sam
🚨💣 BREAKING: Real Madrid have sent 50,000 PAGES, THOUSANDS OF DOCUMENTS, EVIDENCE & STATEMENTS to UEFA on the NEGREIRA CASE. The investigation has now OFFICIALLY STARTED![ diarioas]
🔥52❤4👍3😁2
Signed Sam
🚨🚨 BREAKING: Real Madrid has requested that Barcelona be STRIPPED of ALL titles won during the years in which the Catalan club paid off the VP of refs, Negreira. They want Barcelona STRIPPED of EVERYTHINg they won between 2001 and 2018. UEFA are now OFFICIALLY investigating, and could BAN Barcelona from their competitions. [diarioas]
❤44🤣23🔥9👍2
Signed Sheldon
🔙
❤63👍8😢4🤡2
Signed Sheldon
🚀 Ready to level up your bankroll? 1xBet gives you the highest odds and the biggest payouts on all major sports events! Double your power instantly: 👉 Register with promo code: 1XBONE26 👉 Get a +100% Bonus added to your first deposit! 🎟️ Join now and start betting smart: https://tinyurl.com/24b8au4u
👍2❤1
Signed Sheldon
🚨 CONFIRMED: Cristiano Ronaldo NEVER asked to play EVERY game for Portugal. The agreement was he would play 2/4 games this break and he agreed to this without problem. The issue was Jorge Jesus then saying he’s going to play in the next two games and then changing his mind. Cristiano felt used and disrespected by the Federation who asked him NOT to retire and promised full respect until 2027. [marca]
👍47❤14👏2
Signed Sam
Before and after. Never forget.
❤91🔥12😁3💩2💯2
Signed Sheldon
🚨💣 BREAKING: Arda Güler is Real Madrid PLAYER OF THE MONTH!
❤110🔥14👍3❤🔥1
Signed Sam
Showing the 12 most recent of 461 posts we hold for @real_madrid_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 14 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Real Madrid C.F.™” (@real_madrid_en), 24,838 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/real_madrid_en.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.