Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Chelsea FC ๐Ÿ–ค

Channel

Chelsea FC ๐Ÿ–ค

@chelseafcen

On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Posts edited after publishing ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

28,522subscribers

-551 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ€“31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001924905825
TypeChannel
Username@chelseafcen
Description๐ŸดGet all Chelsea news,interviews and more here! For advertisement: Dm @Rafaelmussie Or @xyc_sami Cross: @Mryarukiads Chelsea (No copyright)
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chelseafcen

Topic

Sports โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

28,52229,13828,8307 August 2026 โ€” 29,073 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 29,073 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 29,066 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 29,041 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 29,014 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 28,982 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 28,959 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 29,037 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 28,988 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 28,976 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 29,138 subscribers18 August 2026 โ€” 29,083 subscribers19 August 2026 โ€” 29,039 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 29,001 subscribers22 August 2026 โ€” 29,062 subscribers23 August 2026 โ€” 28,996 subscribers25 August 2026 โ€” 28,947 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 28,930 subscribers27 August 2026 โ€” 28,915 subscribers28 August 2026 โ€” 28,898 subscribers29 August 2026 โ€” 28,862 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 28,835 subscribers31 August 2026 โ€” 28,814 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 28,792 subscribers2 September 2026 โ€” 28,771 subscribers4 September 2026 โ€” 28,726 subscribers6 September 2026 โ€” 28,815 subscribers10 September 2026 โ€” 28,864 subscribers12 September 2026 โ€” 28,805 subscribers14 September 2026 โ€” 28,823 subscribers15 September 2026 โ€” 28,766 subscribers18 September 2026 โ€” 28,794 subscribers29 September 2026 โ€” 28,522 subscribers7 August 202629 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 53 days, net -551. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 28,430โ€“29,230 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Sept 2026, 23:1728,522-272
18 Sept 2026, 00:3728,794+28
15 Sept 2026, 20:5528,766-57
14 Sept 2026, 03:1528,823+18
12 Sept 2026, 10:3728,805-59
10 Sept 2026, 05:3928,864+49
6 Sept 2026, 19:5628,815+89
4 Sept 2026, 05:3728,726-45
2 Sept 2026, 15:4928,771-21
1 Sept 2026, 12:2328,792-22
31 Aug 2026, 09:3628,814-21
30 Aug 2026, 08:5628,835-27
29 Aug 2026, 07:2728,862-36
28 Aug 2026, 05:5428,898-17
27 Aug 2026, 03:4728,915-15
26 Aug 2026, 04:1128,930-17
25 Aug 2026, 03:5628,947-49
23 Aug 2026, 20:2628,996-66
22 Aug 2026, 04:1529,062+61
20 Aug 2026, 17:1429,001first reading

Engagement

901 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
5.52%
avg views รท 28,522 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,570
199 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.54%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
199
of 901 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 195 of 199 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held901 (7 August 2026 โ€“ 30 September 2026)
Views total313,368
Reactions total4,738
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 11:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
โ‰ˆ13,200
Videos
โ‰ˆ641
Links
โ‰ˆ733

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
20m 26s
Average length
3m 24s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

23,685 reactions across 884 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค18,90879.8%
๐Ÿคฃ1,7987.59%
๐Ÿ˜6852.89%
๐Ÿ”ฅ6252.64%
๐Ÿ‘5422.29%
๐Ÿ’ฏ1720.726%
๐Ÿ™1710.722%
๐Ÿ‘1500.633%
๐Ÿฅฐ1150.486%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ820.346%
๐Ÿ’”700.296%
๐Ÿคท350.148%
๐Ÿ˜ก340.144%
๐Ÿพ320.135%
๐Ÿ˜ข270.114%
๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚230.097%
๐Ÿ†210.089%
๐Ÿ˜210.089%
๐Ÿค”190.08%
๐Ÿค170.072%
22 further kinds1380.583%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 885 of the 901 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 23,685 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 901 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 901 we hold a reading for ยท 0.2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @chelseafcen. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 901 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 30 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Sept 2026, 11:08 UTC151 views6 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ Moisรฉs Caicedoโ€™s return remains uncertain ahead of Chelseaโ€™s clash with Bournemouth. The midfielder has missed much of the season with a persistent calf issue and was not seen in any of Chelseaโ€™s training photos released on Monday, despite hopes he could be available. ๐Ÿ“Œ Bobby Vincent + Football London #CFC | #Chelsea

โค5๐Ÿ’”1

Signed โœ๏ธ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—š๐—ข๐—ญ๐—œ๐—˜ ๐— ๐—”๐—ก ๐Ÿ‘‘๐Ÿพ๐Ÿ…๐Ÿ

30 Sept 2026, 11:06 UTC181 views6 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

๐Ÿšจ Alex Scott has rejected multiple proposals to extend his Bournemouth contract, although talks between the midfielder, the club and his representatives are still ongoing. Chelsea continue to monitor the situation closely. ๐Ÿ“Œ Bobby Vincent + Football London #CFC | #Chelsea

โค5๐Ÿ‘1

Signed โœ๏ธ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—š๐—ข๐—ญ๐—œ๐—˜ ๐— ๐—”๐—ก ๐Ÿ‘‘๐Ÿพ๐Ÿ…๐Ÿ

30 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC190 views3 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

โ€ผ๏ธ There are strong denials from both Estevรฃo's camp and Chelsea that there are any issues between him and Xabi Alonso. ๐Ÿ“Œ Nizaar Kinsella + BBC Sports #CFC | #Chelsea

โค3

Signed โœ๏ธ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—š๐—ข๐—ญ๐—œ๐—˜ ๐— ๐—”๐—ก ๐Ÿ‘‘๐Ÿพ๐Ÿ…๐Ÿ

30 Sept 2026, 11:03 UTC182 views3 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ Chelsea Football Club and Chelsea FC Women today announce the expansion of our relationship with Topps, which becomes Official Trading Card Partner of the club on a long-term, exclusive deal. #CFC | #Chelsea

๐Ÿ˜3

Signed โœ๏ธ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—š๐—ข๐—ญ๐—œ๐—˜ ๐— ๐—”๐—ก ๐Ÿ‘‘๐Ÿพ๐Ÿ…๐Ÿ

29 Sept 2026, 22:21 UTCโ‰ˆ1,270 views40 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡จ Moisรฉs Caicedo with Roger Federer and Juan Mata at the Laver Cup! ๐ŸŽพ #CFC | #Chelsea

๐Ÿฅฐ28โค11๐Ÿ”ฅ1

Signed โœ๏ธ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—š๐—ข๐—ญ๐—œ๐—˜ ๐— ๐—”๐—ก ๐Ÿ‘‘๐Ÿพ๐Ÿ…๐Ÿ

29 Sept 2026, 20:28 UTCโ‰ˆ1,460 views38 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

An England assist for Morgan Rogers against Czechia! ๐Ÿ…ฐ๏ธ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐Ÿ”ต #CFC | #Chelsea #InternationalWatch

โค32๐Ÿ”ฅ4โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2

Signed โœ๏ธ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—š๐—ข๐—ญ๐—œ๐—˜ ๐— ๐—”๐—ก ๐Ÿ‘‘๐Ÿพ๐Ÿ…๐Ÿ

29 Sept 2026, 20:19 UTCโ‰ˆ1,380 views26 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Posted without readable text

๐Ÿคฃ19โค4๐Ÿ˜3

Signed โœ๏ธ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—š๐—ข๐—ญ๐—œ๐—˜ ๐— ๐—”๐—ก ๐Ÿ‘‘๐Ÿพ๐Ÿ…๐Ÿ

29 Sept 2026, 20:05 UTCโ‰ˆ1,240 views16 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Posted without readable text

๐Ÿคฃ14โค1๐Ÿฅฑ1

Signed โœ๏ธ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—š๐—ข๐—ญ๐—œ๐—˜ ๐— ๐—”๐—ก ๐Ÿ‘‘๐Ÿพ๐Ÿ…๐Ÿ

29 Sept 2026, 19:33 UTCโ‰ˆ1,230 views24 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Staying sharp. ๐Ÿซก #CFC | #Chelsea

โค19๐Ÿ”ฅ4๐Ÿฅฐ1

Signed โœ๏ธ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—š๐—ข๐—ญ๐—œ๐—˜ ๐— ๐—”๐—ก ๐Ÿ‘‘๐Ÿพ๐Ÿ…๐Ÿ

29 Sept 2026, 18:41 UTCโ‰ˆ1,250 views23 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

๐Ÿšจ Man Cityโ€™s rivals are waiting for the sanctions procedure to play out but already within the football industry there is talk of clubs wanting them to be EXPELLED โฌ‡๏ธ from the Premier League. ๐Ÿ“Œ Times Sport #CFC | #Chelsea

โค16๐Ÿ˜7

Signed โœ๏ธ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—š๐—ข๐—ญ๐—œ๐—˜ ๐— ๐—”๐—ก ๐Ÿ‘‘๐Ÿพ๐Ÿ…๐Ÿ

29 Sept 2026, 18:31 UTCโ‰ˆ1,290 views11 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ—ฃ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ PFA Chief Executive Maheta Molango defends Cole Palmer: "When England see five players who need to withdraw when the single most proud moment a player has is to be called up for the national team, you just ask yourself, what's wrong about the industry?" "You see people like Cole Palmer, someone who would have played four consecutive summers in a row had he gone to the World Cup, and you wonder why is he miโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ†’6โค5

Signed โœ๏ธ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—š๐—ข๐—ญ๐—œ๐—˜ ๐— ๐—”๐—ก ๐Ÿ‘‘๐Ÿพ๐Ÿ…๐Ÿ

29 Sept 2026, 12:08 UTCโ‰ˆ1,520 views14 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

๐Ÿšจ Roma and Monaco want to keep Manu Konรฉ and Lamine Camara this January. Chelsea are also monitoring Sander Berge and Alex Scott as midfield options, but Fulham and Bournemouth will want to keep their players. Chelsea finding the right profile to partner Caicedo regardless of their age? I see Nicoll-Jazuli as more of a box-to-box midfielder, or perhaps more of a number eight, but it is true that Chelsea have used hโ€ฆ

โค13๐Ÿค”1

Signed โœ๏ธ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—š๐—ข๐—ญ๐—œ๐—˜ ๐— ๐—”๐—ก ๐Ÿ‘‘๐Ÿพ๐Ÿ…๐Ÿ

Showing the 12 most recent of 901 posts we hold for @chelseafcen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@chelseafcen edited 1 post after it first published โ€” the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too โ€” this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Sept 2026, 19:51 UTCAnonymous Quiz696 voters

Who were the goalscorers for us in that match?

  1. Lukaku and Kovacic6%
  2. Lukaku and Jorginho(Penalty goal)40%
  3. Lukaku and Kai Havertz11%
  4. Lukaku and Reece James43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Sept 2026, 19:47 UTCAnonymous Quiz562 voters

When last did Chelsea get a win over Arsenal?

  1. 22nd of August 202169%
  2. 4th of March 20246%
  3. 12th of December 20253%
  4. 23rd of August 202222%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 901 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 30 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegramโ€™s own answer, not this registerโ€™s. When this register asks Telegramโ€™s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ€” never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโ€™s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

TIA Chelsea Futbal Media
@tiacfutbal ยท 41,176
#1
Chelsea FC ๐Ÿ”ต
@CFC_ChelseaFC ยท 137,376
#2
CHELSEA NEWS ๐Ÿ—ž ๐Ÿ”ต
@Chelsea_fc_worldwide ยท 94,756
#3
โšฝ๏ธ Chelsea Football Club ๐Ÿ’™
@ChelseaFcWorldWide_001 ยท 121,712
#4
CHELSEA ANALYSIS ๐Ÿ“ˆ๐Ÿ”ต
@ChelseaAnalysis ยท 47,198
#5
โšฝ All About Football โšฝ
@Allfootball_01 ยท 26,030
#6
CHELSEA MEDIA ๐ŸŽฅ
@ChelseaFC_Media ยท 22,343
#7
ESPN FOOTBALL
@Espn_Football_News_UK ยท 93,800
#8
๐•‹โ„๐”ผ ๐”น๐•ƒ๐•Œ๐”ผ๐•Šโ„๐•Œ๐”น ๐•๐•€๐”ป๐”ผ๐•†๐•Š แถœแถ แถœ ๐Ÿ”ต โ–ถ๏ธ๐ŸŽฅ
@Theblueshub2 ยท 12,013
#9
ESPN FC
@espnfc1 ยท 52,829
#10
SPORTYBET NG โšฝ๏ธ
@sportybet_x ยท 13,152
#11
Chelsea
@Chealsea ยท 32,883
#12
CHELSEA FC๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿ†
@ChelseaFCNews01 ยท 11,760
#13
Chelsea FC Women
@ChelseaWomen_FC ยท 13,023
#14
Troll Football
@Troll_Football_Telegram ยท 145,555
#15
SAA | CHELSEA ๐Ÿ”ต
@chelseatv_x ยท 3,684
#16
Everything Chelsea๐Ÿ’™
@everythingChelsea1 ยท 4,625
#17
ESPN FC
@Espnfc_news ยท 61,881
#18
๐Ÿ“บ All Chelsea Blog Channel
@allchelseablog ยท 5,668
#19
433
@Football433_uk ยท 69,349
#20
Premier League
@premier_league_football_news ยท 87,452
#21
CHELSEA FOOTY๐Ÿ”ตโšฝ๏ธ ( WORLD CHAMPIONS๐Ÿ†)
@Chelseafooty01 ยท 3,214
#22
Sky Sports Football
@Sky_Sportz_football ยท 66,145
#23
CHELSEA FC FANTASY ๐Ÿ”ต
@chelseafcfantasy ยท 1,412
#24
Chelsea Fc Fan
@chelsea_prideoflondon ยท 198,945
#25
Premier League๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ
@mybestpremierleague ยท 24,782
#26
Chelsea Fc fan goal
@chelseaa_goal ยท 4,514
#27
Goal Sportโ„ข
@goal_sport_football ยท 39,751
#28
FPL Memes
@fplmemestg ยท 2,382
#29
Supersport CBS
@supersportcbs ยท 30,338
#30
Premier League ๐Ÿ†
@PL_PremierLeague ยท 40,578
#31
Chelsea - Sun Sport
@ChelseaSunSport ยท 40,671
#32
Footy Humour
@footyhumourr ยท 7,988
#33
Sky Sports Footballโ„ข
@skysportsfootballupdates ยท 29,334
#34
Premier League News
@Premier_League_News_TG ยท 261,764
#35
VETLAND SPORTS
@vetland_sports_football1 ยท 109,194
#36
Tony's Sports
@TonySportsHub ยท 13,955
#37
Sky Sports Football
@Sky_sports_football_updates ยท 259,127
#38
Here We Go Club
@herewegoclub ยท 84,076
#39
BBC Sport Football
@BBC_Sports_Football_Updates ยท 52,930
#40
Just Football
@jfball ยท 91,793
#41
Transfer News Live
@TransferNews_Live ยท 49,048
#42
433
@football433official ยท 8,611
#43
BOOMBET
@boombet301 ยท 65,050
#44
Official Fabrizio Romano
@FabrizioRomanoTG ยท 405,860
#45
English Premier League Update
@Premier_League_Update ยท 117,851
#46
Transfer News Football
@transfer_news_football ยท 88,421
#47
Football
@footballfactlys ยท 32,509
#48
Sky Sports News
@skysport_football_official ยท 51,533
#49
Premier League ๐Ÿฆ
@PremierLeague_football ยท 25,695
#50
FC BARCELONAโ„ข
@FCBarcelonaenn ยท 97,274
#51
UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE
@uefa_champion_leaguee ยท 149,526
#52
B/R Football
@br_football_news ยท 79,421
#53
Premier League
@english_premier_league_links ยท 39,145
#54
SOFA SCORE โšฝ๏ธ
@sofascore_uk ยท 56,020
#55
Fabrizio Romano
@FabrizioRomano_uk ยท 72,302
#56
Manchester United FC
@Manchester_UtdCentral ยท 121
#57
REAL MADRID C.F.
@Realmadrid_world ยท 116,069
#58
Euni Gem Calls
@eunigemscalls ยท 4,827
#59
FC BARCELONAโ„ข๏ธ
@Barcelona_worldwide ยท 32,757
#60
Manchester City
@mancity247 ยท 45,708
#61
LIVE SCORE MATCH
@live_score_Cricket ยท 30,491
#62
Lionel Messi
@Messi_lionel_uk ยท 52,169
#63
UEFA Champions League
@Championss_Leaguee ยท 13,681
#64
FOOTY TOUCH | EuroFootball
@football_touchline ยท 34,349
#65
LIVE SCORE HD
@LiveScoreXq ยท 46,763
#66
Fabrizio Romano ๐Ÿ“ž
@FabrizioRomanoESP ยท 22,766
#67
Scores24
@scores24en ยท 16,642
#68
Lionel Messi Fans
@Lionel_Messi_10_Fans ยท 47,273
#69
Football Humor
@footy_humorr ยท 5,492
#70
MANCHESTER UNITED ๐Ÿ”ด
@manchesterunited ยท 93,965
#71
Real Madrid C.F.
@real_madrid ยท 112,592
#72
Real Madrid Central
@realmadridfran ยท 24,741
#73
Fantasy Premier League
@Fantasy_Epl ยท 31,138
#74
Football XI News Live
@footballxilive ยท 32,984
#75
LIVERPOOL FC
@liverpool_worldwide ยท 62,593
#76
Manchester City FC
@manchester_city ยท 129,864
#77
Maestros Gem Calls
@gemsmaestros ยท 3,772
#78
Atletico Madrid
@madrid_atletico ยท 16,536
#79
UEFA Champions League
@Uefa_Competition ยท 10,567
#80
Real Madrid C.F.โ„ข
@real_madrid_en ยท 24,838
#81
S.S.C Napoli
@Napoli_SSC_Updates ยท 4,660
#82
FC BARCELONA
@barcelonaen ยท 116,706
#83

Read from Telegramโ€™s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ€” how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

โšฝ All About Football โšฝ
@Allfootball_01 ยท 26,030
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here โ€” alongside 84 others โ€” read 13 September 2026
CHELSEA MEDIA ๐ŸŽฅ
@ChelseaFC_Media ยท 22,343
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here โ€” alongside 81 others โ€” read 20 September 2026
TIA Chelsea Futbal Media
@tiacfutbal ยท 41,176
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here โ€” alongside 85 others โ€” read 29 August 2026
โšฝ๏ธ Chelsea Football Club ๐Ÿ’™
@ChelseaFcWorldWide_001 ยท 121,712
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here โ€” alongside 88 others โ€” read 14 August 2026
CHELSEA ANALYSIS ๐Ÿ“ˆ๐Ÿ”ต
@ChelseaAnalysis ยท 47,198
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 94 here โ€” alongside 93 others โ€” read 26 August 2026
Chelsea
@Chealsea ยท 32,883
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here โ€” alongside 87 others โ€” read 4 September 2026
Chelsea - Sun Sport
@ChelseaSunSport ยท 40,671
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here โ€” alongside 86 others โ€” read 29 August 2026
CHELSEA NEWS ๐Ÿ—ž ๐Ÿ”ต
@Chelsea_fc_worldwide ยท 94,756
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 95 here โ€” alongside 94 others โ€” read 16 August 2026
Chelsea FC ๐Ÿ”ต
@CFC_ChelseaFC ยท 137,376
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 94 here โ€” alongside 93 others โ€” read 13 August 2026
Kenyan memes Channel Official
@jokersmokermemes001 ยท 61,331
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 58 here โ€” alongside 57 others โ€” read 21 August 2026
ESPN FC
@espnfc1 ยท 52,829
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 91 here โ€” alongside 90 others โ€” read 24 August 2026
BOOMBET
@boombet301 ยท 65,050
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 90 here โ€” alongside 89 others โ€” read 20 August 2026
ESPN FOOTBALL
@Espn_Football_News_UK ยท 93,800
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 89 here โ€” alongside 88 others โ€” read 16 August 2026
BBC Sport Football
@BBC_Sports_Football_Updates ยท 52,930
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 86 here โ€” alongside 85 others โ€” read 24 August 2026
Transfer News Live
@TransferNews_Live ยท 49,048
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 90 here โ€” alongside 89 others โ€” read 26 August 2026
Premier League News
@Premier_League_News_TG ยท 261,764
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 90 here โ€” alongside 89 others โ€” read 11 August 2026
VETLAND SPORTS
@vetland_sports_football1 ยท 109,194
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 89 here โ€” alongside 88 others โ€” read 14 August 2026
Premier League ๐Ÿฆ
@PremierLeague_football ยท 25,695
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 85 here โ€” alongside 84 others โ€” read 13 September 2026
Premier League
@english_premier_league_links ยท 39,145
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 87 here โ€” alongside 86 others โ€” read 30 August 2026
Sky Sports News
@skysport_football_official ยท 51,533
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 90 here โ€” alongside 89 others โ€” read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œChelsea FC ๐Ÿ–คโ€ (@chelseafcen), 28,522 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chelseafcen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.