Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 34% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 170,187–170,223 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 20:23
170,191
-9
11 Aug 2026, 23:55
170,200
-19
10 Aug 2026, 23:13
170,219
+9
9 Aug 2026, 22:21
170,210
+9
9 Aug 2026, 00:55
170,201
-2
8 Aug 2026, 04:16
170,203
+5
7 Aug 2026, 06:06
170,198
-13
6 Aug 2026, 07:32
170,211
first reading
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.19%
avg views ÷ 170,191 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,830
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
35 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
309,020
Reactions total
1,268
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,238 reactions across 33 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
516
41.7%
👍
277
22.4%
🙏
252
20.4%
🔥
47
3.80%
😱
28
2.26%
👏
26
2.10%
😢
21
1.70%
🤬
17
1.37%
🕊
10
0.808%
😡
9
0.727%
😭
8
0.646%
🤔
6
0.485%
💯
5
0.404%
🥰
5
0.404%
🫡
5
0.404%
😁
4
0.323%
💔
2
0.162%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,268reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 35 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pv_svo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Катастрофа атомной подводной лодки К-141 «Курск» произошла 12 августа 2000 года в Баренцевом море во время учений.
В результате начавшейся ещё на берегу последовательности нарушений в процедурах обращения с торпедой 65-76А в первом отсеке произошёл взрыв кислородно-керосиновой смеси и возник пожар, что привело к выходу из строя экипажа первых трёх отсеков, включая главный командный пункт. Неуправляемая лодка пошла к…
🇷🇺 Напоминаем, что в составе наших ресурсов есть следующие:
✅ Собственно, сам тг канал Правовой вестник СВО. Мы с вами с декабря 2023 года.
✅ Чат оперативной правовой помощи. Вы можете задать вопросы военным юристам и сотрудникам соцслужб в он-лайн режиме.
https://t.me/+Y_CSu2qfyNIxYWI6
✅ Духовно-психологический вестник СВО.
На этом канале мы публикуем все, что связано с психологией, психиатрией, помощью себе и бл…
🔥Часто встречающиеся заблуждения и мифы касательно выплат, ранений, ввк.
▶️ "Выплату за ранение можно получить столько раз, сколько было ранений"
✅ И да, и нет. Если с каждым ранением боец попадает в госпиталь, на него оформляется пакет справок, то это рассматривается, как отдельное ранение. Если оно подпадает под выплату - то выплата за каждое такое ранение.
А если боец получил несколько ранений, и с ними всеми по…
Контракт о прохождении службы в ВС РФ бывает первый и новый
1️⃣Первый контракт заключают граждане, ранее не проходившие военную службу по контракту, и вновь поступающие на военную службу по контракту из запаса.
2️⃣Новый контракт заключают военнослужащие, проходящие военную службу по контракту, либо граждане, ранее проходившие военную службу по контракту.
❓Сроки действия контракта
Начало - дата вступления контракт…
Почему прекратилась выплата ребёнку военнослужащего пропавшего без вести после достижения им совершеннолетия?
💻В правовую службу КСВО поступают обращения от семей военнослужащих, пропавших без вести.
Один из вопросов:
«Военнослужащий пропал без вести. В браке он не состоял, но у него есть ребёнок. До совершеннолетия мать ребёнка как законный представитель оформила выплаты. В мае ребёнку исполнилось 18 лет, а в июне …
Дорогие друзья.
Мы видим, что многие принимают решение идти на службу по контракту. Это серьезный шаг, перед совершением которого важно иметь четкую и достоверную информацию.
Чтобы вы могли ориентироваться в условиях, требованиях и своих правах, и чтобы вас не ввели в заблуждение, мы собрали подробную и актуальную сводку.
Ознакомиться с ней можно по ссылке ниже. Рекомендуем сохранить и изучить, если вы или ваши бл…
Навязчивые мысли и картинка перед глазами. Как сделать её тише
Вы легли, свет выключен. И она приходит. Та самая картинка, которую вы не звали: что могло случиться, что вам рассказали, что вы увидели однажды и до сих пор видите.
Вы гоните её, а она возвращается ещё ярче. Так и работает: приказать себе не думать невозможно, от запрета образ становится только чётче.
Но есть обходной путь. Не спорить с картинкой, а п…
🔥СВО. Как оформить государственную пенсию по случаю потери кормильца
✅Пенсия от СФР назначается в случае:
-признания гибели кормильца не военной;
-после признания бойца безвестно отсутствующим по суду до момента признания его умершим;
-при переходе с пенсии СФР на военную пенсию нужно сначала отказаться от государственной;
-при оформлении пенсии в МО впервые в заявлении есть пункт отказа от пенсии СФР - это нормальн…
Право женщины на материнство после гибели супруга закреплено законом
✏️Президент Российской Федерации подписал Федеральный закон от 04.08.2026 № 286-ФЗ «О внесении изменения в статью 169 Семейного кодекса Российской Федерации».
Закон закрепляет важную гарантию для женщин, чьи супруги погибли, но при жизни приняли решение о рождении ребёнка и дали возможность сохранить свой генетический материал для применения вспом…
Что творится в голове, вернувшегося с СВО
Он вздрагивает от хлопнувшей двери. Не спит. Может вспылить из-за ерунды, а через час не понимать, что это было.
Вы объясняете это характером: испортился, очерствел, стал чужим. А это не характер. Это три системы мозга, которые перенастроились, чтобы он выжил там, и не успели перенастроиться обратно.
Попробую объяснить, что это за системы.
Первая: сигнализация. Глубоко в …
🙏67❤14😭7😁2🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @pv_svo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 71,235 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Госуслуги: для родителей @gosuslugiforparents · 678,945 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
Социальный фонд России @sfr_gov · 378,247 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
НЕ ЖДИ меня из Украины @poisk_in_ua · 343,354 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Правовой вестник СВО” (@pv_svo), 170,191 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pv_svo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
