Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

КЛИК

@krLiman_info

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,501subscribers

-52 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001794649519
TypeChannel
Username@krLiman_info
DescriptionНовостной Телеграм-канал РКН https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/672ddec7478a4330c78a6e62
Created13 July 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/krLiman_info

Growth

15,50115,55415,527.56 August 2026 — 15,553 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,553 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,554 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,553 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,542 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,534 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,527 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,519 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,509 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,505 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,501 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,493–15,562 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:4915,501-4
13 Aug 2026, 09:5615,505-4
12 Aug 2026, 12:3815,509-10
11 Aug 2026, 14:1815,519-8
10 Aug 2026, 12:3715,527-7
9 Aug 2026, 14:1115,534-8
8 Aug 2026, 14:4815,542-11
7 Aug 2026, 15:5815,553-1
6 Aug 2026, 14:0015,554+1
6 Aug 2026, 02:2015,553no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:3315,553first reading

Engagement

155 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.19%
avg views ÷ 15,501 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,110
155 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.623%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
155
of 155 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 150 of 155 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held155 (4 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total172,782
Reactions total1,051
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
14,000
Videos
12,700
Links
12,300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
27m 12s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 51 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

960 reactions across 141 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🙏21222.1%
🔥19320.1%
🤬16517.2%
👍15115.7%
👏10611.0%
😱454.69%
😁202.08%
😭202.08%
🕊141.46%
🤯141.46%
👌121.25%
🫡50.521%
🤝20.208%
🎉10.104%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 150 of the 155 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,051reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 155 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 05:12 UTC185 viewsread 15 August 2026

По сообщению Главы ДНР, один человек погиб и еще десять мирных жителей республики пострадали вчера из-за атак украинских ударных БПЛА. 🔴КЛИК

15 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC262 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

В Луганске возможны перебои в работе интернета У провайдера ЛДС возникли технические неполадки на оборудовании. Из-за этого у части абонентов могут наблюдаться проблемы с доступом к сети. Специалисты уже работают над устранением неисправности. #Луганск #ЛНР #связь 🔴КЛИК

15 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC456 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

ВС РФ нанесли серию ударов по объектам военной инфраструктуры на подконтрольных Киеву территориях Основной целью атаки в Житомирской области стало топливное хранилище, а также ремонтные цеха и склады. Кроме того, зафиксированы удары по портовой инфраструктуре в Николаеве и Измаиле, где была поражена железнодорожная станция, используемая для перевалки военных грузов. В Кировоградской области в районе станции Знаменк

👏1🤬1

15 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTC551 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Новости фронта: ▪️На Константиновском фронте позиционное противостояние в Алексеево-Дружковке и «карманах» по обе стороны от Константиновки. ВС РФ активно используют дроны и авиацию для уничтожения логистики и резервов врага в Дружковке. ▪️На Славянском направлении тактические успехи есть западнее Малиновки. В районе Николаевки без изменений на земле. Российский дрон сбил с флагштока в парке Краматорска украинский

🤬1🙏1

14 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC≈1,070 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Мошенники начали использовать новую схему обмана сотрудников на удаленной работе Злоумышленники связываются с гражданами от лица работодателей или государственных структур, предлагая оформить компенсацию за использование личного компьютера и домашнего интернета. Для получения выплаты жертв просят пройти идентификацию на фишинговом сайте или сообщить код из СМС. Также зафиксированы случаи рассылки сообщений от имени

👍2

14 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Жители новых регионов могут столкнуться с ограничениями движения из-за проведения ремонтных работ на ключевых магистралях В профильных ведомствах предупреждают, что дорожные службы приступили к обновлению асфальтового покрытия на участках федеральных трасс. В связи с этим вводится временный запрет на проезд по ряду полос, а также устанавливаются скоростные ограничения для обеспечения безопасности дорожного движения.

14 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈1,010 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Польские фермеры опасаются ввоза украинского зерна под видом транзита Власти Польши ведут переговоры с Украиной о транзите сельскохозяйственной продукции через свою территорию в другие страны. При этом импорт пшеницы, кукурузы, рапса и подсолнечника из Украины на польский рынок остается под запретом. Местные аграрии выражают недоверие к таким мерам, опасаясь, что часть поставок осядет внутри страны. По мнению ферме

👌1🤯1

14 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC≈1,040 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Российские военные нанесли удар по объекту топливной инфраструктуры в Полтавской области Операторы беспилотных летательных аппаратов поразили автозаправочную станцию в городе Лубны. В результате точечного удара объект, который использовался для обеспечения логистики украинских подразделений, получил серьезные повреждения. #Полтава #Удары #БПЛА 🔴КЛИК

👏3😱1

14 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC≈1,000 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Массированный налет беспилотников произошел в Горловке Ночью украинские БПЛА атаковали территорию местной больницы и жилые частные дома. В результате ударов зафиксированы повреждения гражданской инфраструктуры, имеются пострадавшие среди мирного населения. Также под обстрелы попали Донецк и Мариуполь. На местах происшествий работают экстренные службы. #Горловка #Донецк #Мариуполь 🔴КЛИК https://max.ru/krLiman_inf

🤬2😱1

14 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC≈1,000 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026

ВС РФ нанесли 811 ударов по объектам инфраструктуры ВСУ в Запорожской области По данным местных властей, под огневое поражение за минувшие сутки попали цели в 52 населенных пунктах региона, находящихся под контролем украинских войск. В результате обстрелов зафиксированы повреждения объектов инфраструктуры противника. #Запорожье #СВО 🔴КЛИК

🔥3🤬1

14 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC998 views0 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Румыния подняла в воздух истребители F-16 из-за появления неопознанного беспилотника Цель была зафиксирована вблизи границы с Украиной, в двух километрах южнее населённого пункта Пардина. По данным министерства обороны страны, аппарат двигался вдоль Килийского рукава Дуная и находился в румынском воздушном пространстве около десяти минут. #Румыния #БПЛА 🔴КЛИК

Showing the 12 most recent of 155 posts we hold for @krLiman_info. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 752,545 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Правовой вестник СВО
@pv_svo · 170,152
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026
Жены и СВО
@wifes_swo · 109,995
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026
НЕ ЖДИ меня из Украины
@poisk_in_ua · 343,528
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КЛИК” (@krLiman_info), 15,501 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krLiman_info.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.