🎥 Вебинар: AI-ассистент на ваших документах: почему он врёт и что с этим делать Внедрили AI-ассистента по документам, а он уверенно выдаёт неправду? Без кода и формул разберём, почему так происходит, какие есть рычаги качества и как грамотно ставить задачу команде. 🧠 Что будет разобрано: • Почему AI уверенно выдумывает ответы (простыми словами) • Из чего складывается качество ответа по документам • Какие рычаги под…

Channel
Библиотека программиста (книги для разработчиков)
@programmist_of
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
20,713subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001388831150 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @programmist_of |
| Description | Книги по программированию. Книги для дизайнеров, верстальщиков, IT специалистов. По всем вопросам @evgenycarter РКН clck.ru/3KoESW |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/programmist_of |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 20,713 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 20,714 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 20,716 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:55 | 20,718 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 20,729 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 20,732 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.52%
- avg views ÷ 20,713 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,760
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.226%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 10
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (12 June 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 17,639 |
| Reactions total | 38 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 812
- Videos
- 98
- Links
- 503
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
74 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 34 | 45.9% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 14.9% | |
| 🤮 | 11 | 14.9% | |
| 💩 | 5 | 6.76% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 5.41% | |
| 🖕 | 3 | 4.05% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 4.05% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 2.70% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
📚 Anyone Can Code: Algorithmic Thinking (2023) ✍️ Авторы: Ali Arya Это вторая книга из серии про ту самую логику, которая лежит в основе разработки софта. Главная цель — прокачать алгоритмическое мышление: 💚 От простых алгоритмов к структурам данных и классам 💚 Примеры на C/C++ и Python с иллюстрациями 💚 Меньше магии, больше логики Подойдёт всем, кто хочет улучшить навыки скиллы и выйти за рамки простого ремесла п…
❤2🔥2
🚀 Подборка полезных IT каналов в Max Системное администрирование, DevOps 📌 https://max.ru/i_odmin Все для системного администратора https://max.ru/bash_srv Bash Советы https://max.ru/sysadminof Книги для админов, полезные материалы https://max.ru/i_odmin_book Библиотека Системного Администратора https://max.ru/i_devops DevOps: Пишем о Docker, Kubernetes и др. https://max.ru/tipsysdmin Типичный Сисадмин https://max…
🖕2👍1💩1🤮1
📚 Anyone Can Code: The Art and Science of Logical Creativity, 1st Edition (2020) ✍️ Авторы: Ali Arya Книга, которая научит тебя прогать через логическое мышление и модульность! Это не про синтаксис и библиотеки, а про то, как правильно решать задачи и мыслить как алгоритм. В книге разобраны основы программирования через три языка: C/C++, Python и JavaScript. И нет, это не скучные примеры — здесь ты сможешь создать …
👍2🔥2
📚 Introduction to Algorithms, 4th Edition (2022) ✍️ Авторы: Thomas H. Cormen, Charles E. Leiserson, Ronald L. Rivest, Clifford Stein Четвёртое издание легендарного «кирпича» по алгоритмам прокачали: ✔️ Добавили матчинги в двудольных графах ✔️ Онлайн-алгоритмы ✔️ Машинное обучение ✔️ Новые упражнения (140 штук — на случай, если ты думал отдохнуть) Традиционно книга остается: 💚 Строгой, но понятной (как хороший тим…
👍5🔥1
📊 Глубокое погружение в профессиональные инструменты на реальных проектах. Записывайтесь на курс «Системный аналитик. Экспертный уровень». 🎁 Учавствуйте в 3 бесплатных вебинарах — познакомьтесь с программой обучения и преподавателями. Задайте свои вопросы экспертам! 6 августа, 20:00 мск — «Пользовательские сценарии (Use Cases) на реальном примере»: от бизнес-требования до задачи разработчику. Анализ требований, соз…
🔥1
🚀 Подборка полезных IT каналов в Max Системное администрирование, DevOps 📌 https://max.ru/i_odmin Все для системного администратора https://max.ru/bash_srv Bash Советы https://max.ru/sysadminof Книги для админов, полезные материалы https://max.ru/i_odmin_book Библиотека Системного Администратора https://max.ru/i_devops DevOps: Пишем о Docker, Kubernetes и др. https://max.ru/tipsysdmin Типичный Сисадмин https://max…
💩3🤡2🤮2👍1
В распределённых системах надёжность обмена данными — не опция, а необходимость. Потеря сообщений, нестабильные очереди и сложности масштабирования способны поставить на паузу даже самый перспективный проект. 3 августа в 20:00 OTUS проводит открытый урок «Использование брокера сообщений Apache Kafka в распределённых очередях» — в преддверии старта курса «Микросервисная архитектура». На вебинаре вы разберёте архитек…
👍2
📚 Python Real-World Projects: Craft your Python portfolio with deployable applications (2023) ✍️ Автор: Steven F. Lott Внутри тебя ждет 12 практических проектов и необходимая база: ❣️ Основные артефакты приложения, включая документацию и тестовые сценарии ❣️ Подходы к получению данных: обработку файлов, RESTful API и SQL-запросы ❣️ Как создать notebook для анализа данных, чтобы определить свойства исходных данных…
👍2🔥1
📚 JavaScript: The Definitive Guide: Master the World's Most-Used Programming Language, 7th edition (2020) ✍️ Автор: David Flanagan Седьмое издание легендарной книги охватывает главы про async/await, генераторы, модули и даже метапрограммирование. Что внутри: 💚 Типы, значения, объекты, массивы 💚 Промисы, async/await 💚 Node.js: потоки, файлы, процессы 💚 Стандартная библиотека, регулярки и JSON — короче, всё, чем мы …
👍3🔥2
📹Вебинар: Выбор между Serverless и Kubernetes для AI-ворклоадов: как определить оптимальную платформу под задачу На открытом уроке рассмотрим: - В чем различаются Serverless-подходы и Kubernetes при работе с AI-ворклоадами; - Какие преимущества и ограничения есть у каждого подхода с точки зрения масштабируемости, стоимости и сложности эксплуатации; - Какие трейдоффы нужно учитывать при выборе платформы: холодный ста…
👍1
📚 Real-World Web Development with .NET 9: Build websites and services using mature and proven ASP.NET Core MVC, Web API, and Umbraco CMS (2024) ✍️ Автор: Mark J. Price С ней ты научишься: - Строить сайты на ASP. NET Core MVC, избегая случайных ошибок в архитектуре (все те «странные» места в коде, о которых ты часто забываешь). - Разрабатывать RESTful API и запускать их в production, не переписывая каждый раз роут…
👍2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @programmist_of. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,078,367 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Библиотека программиста (книги для разработчиков)” (@programmist_of), 20,713 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/programmist_of.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.