Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 132 comparable posts for this entry, running 28 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 98 days, net +51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,630–26,749 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 09:45
26,699
-14
10 Nov 2026, 08:11
26,713
-13
8 Nov 2026, 18:11
26,726
-1
7 Nov 2026, 13:17
26,727
+4
6 Nov 2026, 12:17
26,723
-2
5 Nov 2026, 13:21
26,725
+2
4 Nov 2026, 10:18
26,723
-5
3 Nov 2026, 09:59
26,728
+3
2 Nov 2026, 12:08
26,725
-5
1 Nov 2026, 12:18
26,730
-1
31 Oct 2026, 11:15
26,731
-3
30 Oct 2026, 14:39
26,734
+2
29 Oct 2026, 17:59
26,732
-2
28 Oct 2026, 20:38
26,734
-1
27 Oct 2026, 18:55
26,735
+5
26 Oct 2026, 18:07
26,730
+6
25 Oct 2026, 16:56
26,724
+2
23 Oct 2026, 21:15
26,722
-2
23 Oct 2026, 00:14
26,724
+7
21 Oct 2026, 21:19
26,717
first reading
Engagement
144 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 157 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.81%
avg views ÷ 26,699 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,620
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.388%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 144 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 41 of 42 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
144 (28 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
110,005
Reactions total
417
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 05:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
13h 53m
Average length
25m 16s
Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,964 reactions across 140 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
947
48.2%
🔥
373
19.0%
❤
232
11.8%
🎉
109
5.55%
😁
65
3.31%
💩
64
3.26%
🙏
30
1.53%
🤩
21
1.07%
👎
15
0.764%
🤣
14
0.713%
😍
12
0.611%
🤡
9
0.458%
🤯
8
0.407%
👏
7
0.356%
🤔
6
0.305%
🤮
5
0.255%
🫡
5
0.255%
😱
4
0.204%
⚡
3
0.153%
👀
3
0.153%
21 further kinds
32
1.63%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 141 of the 144 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,981 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 144 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 144 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @i_odmin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 144 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
4.86%
7 of 144 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
7
posts carrying an erid · 7 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
2,970
over 7 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,850
over 137 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqwifTgg
1
18 September 2026
18 September 2026
2W5zFGteLzM
1
21 September 2026
21 September 2026
2W5zFH1hTYM
1
10 September 2026
10 September 2026
2W5zFHF64Dw
1
13 October 2026
13 October 2026
2W5zFJUQt57
1
14 October 2026
14 October 2026
2W5zFKAE8KT
1
21 October 2026
21 October 2026
CQH36pWzJqE1dR7Fov77DtMRhzs2SyCqaSHhrquccPTsre
1
24 August 2026
24 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 144 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 42 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🎯 Мониторинг и оптимизация дискового пространства в Linux
💾 Мониторинг использования:
• Проверить свободное место:
df -h
• Размер директории:
du -sh /путь/к/директории
• Топ-10 крупных папок:
du -ah /путь | sort -rh | head -n 10
• Найти большие файлы (>1ГБ):
find / -type f -size +1G 2>/dev/null
📂 Очистка места:
• Удалить старые логи:
find /var/log -type f -name "*.log" -mtime +30 -exec rm -f {}…
👀 Сеть можно видеть по таблице маршрутизации. А можно понимать, что происходит внутри неё.
19 ноября на открытом уроке разберём LSDB и научимся вручную строить карту сети по данным маршрутизаторов.
Поговорим о:
✅ LSA Type 1–5;
✅ связи Router ID, Link-State ID и IP-адресов;
✅ на практике восстановим топологию по реальному дампу.
Это особенно полезно сетевым инженерам и архитекторам, которые работают со сложными инф…
🐧 Карта Linux: Где лежат твои конфиги и почему /tmp опять забит?
Новичку иерархия директорий в Linux кажется хаосом, но на самом деле это строгий стандарт (FHS - Filesystem Hierarchy Standard). Сохраняйте шпаргалку, чтобы не искать логи в /bin и не пытаться запустить бинарники из /etc.
📂 Основные узлы системы:
🟢/bin & /sbin - здесь живут исполняемые файлы. Разница проста: в sbin лежат утилиты для админа (system bi…
Эффективный разбор лог-файлов Linux!
15 примеров, которые администраторы Linux могут использовать ежедневно 👇.
1/ Поиск определенного текста в файле журнала:
grep "error" /var/log/syslog
Эта команда ищет слово "error" в файле syslog.
2/ Подсчитайте вхождения определенного шаблона:
grep -c "error" /var/log/syslog
Эта команда подсчитывает вхождения слова "error" в файл syslog.
3/ Отфильтруйте журналы по диапазону д…
Руководство по настройке и использованию rsync
rsync это мощный инструмент для копирования и синхронизации данных на Linux, который особенно полезен для резервного копирования. Его отличительная черта, передача только изменённых частей файлов, что делает процесс очень быстрым.
🟢 Основные команды rsync
1. Базовая синхронизация:
rsync -av /источник/ /назначение/
- -a (archive): сохраняет структуру каталогов, атр…
Как работает Linux
Обзорная иллюстрация компонент и интерфейсов Linux
Основы Linux: пользователи и вход в систему
Основы Linux: командная строка
Основы Linux: дерево каталогов, файловые системы и файлы
Основы Linux: разграничение прав доступа и потоки ввода-вывода
Основы Linux: процессы и их свойства
Основы Linux: сигналы и управление процессами
Загрузка и дерево процессов Linux и Windows. Параллельные программы: пр…
Stress – это инструмент командной строки Linux, который позволяет нагружать процессор, память, систему ввода-вывода и диск
Установим stress на CentOS, RHEL, Fedora
sudo dnf install stress
Установим stress на Ubuntu и Debian
sudo apt install stress
Синтаксис stress
stress [OPTION [ARG]]
Увеличить нагрузку на процессор
Опция -c или –cpu использует заданное количество воркеров на функции sqrt(), чтобы увеличить нагр…
Протокол ICMP, утилита traceroute
Утилита traceroute (в Windows tracert) используется для определения маршрута от отправителя к получателю. Утилита выдает перечень всех маршрутизаторов, через которые необходимо пройти.
Для определения IP-адресов маршрутизаторов, traceroute использует протокол ICMP. На первом этапе отправляется эхо-запрос (ICMP-пакет с кодом 8, типом 0) со временем жизни 1. Первый маршрутизатор умен…
Основы компьютерных сетей
Тема №1. Основные сетевые термины и сетевые модели
Тема №2. Протоколы верхнего уровня
Тема №3. Протоколы нижних уровней (транспортного, сетевого и канального)
Тема №4. Сетевые устройства и виды применяемых кабелей
Тема №5. Понятие IP адресации, масок подсетей и их расчет
Тема №6. Понятие VLAN, Trunk и протоколы VTP и DTP
Тема №7. Протокол связующего дерева: STP
Тема №8. Протокол агре…
💡Почему мы путаем биты с байтами и как писать правильно
Мы постоянно обсуждаем скорость интернета и объемы данных, но часто путаемся в обозначениях. Мбит или МБ? «b» или «B»?
Существуют строгие стандарты (в том числе ГОСТ 8.417-2002), регламентирующие эти метрики.
Главное правило:
В скорости передачи данных (биты) приставки часто пишутся с маленькой буквы, а в объеме данных (байты) - с большой.
1. Скорость (Data …
🚨 Атака на GitBook: проверьте токены и секреты интеграций
Вечером 2 ноября атакующий получил доступ к части учётных данных инфраструктуры GitBook. В письме клиентам компания сообщила, что в атаке использовались ИИ-агенты. GitBook заблокировал доступ атакующего, заменил внутренние секреты и отозвал персональные API-токены пользователей.
Под угрозой могли оказаться секреты Git Sync, API-токены GitBook и ключи сторонн…
👨🏻🎓Хотите сменить профессию, но не знаете, с чего начать?
Кибербезопасность можно освоить с нуля!
Академия CyberYozh помогает войти в профессию людям разного возраста и с разным опытом, а потом помогает с трудоустройством:
🔹 есть карьерный модуль
🔹 резюме под нужную позицию
🔹 тестовые собеседования и консультации с HR.
Начать можно с бесплатной карьерной консультации.
На ней расскажут, как устроено обучение, какие…
❤3💩2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 144 posts we hold for @i_odmin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 6 posts on @i_odmin as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
20 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
29 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Книги для Системного Администратора @i_odmin_book · 18,778 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 October 2026
Типичный Сисадмин @sysodmins · 40,818 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 31 August 2026
Секреты сисадмина | DevOps, Linux, SRE @sysadmin_library · 25,689 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 September 2026
ServerAdmin.ru @srv_admin · 32,691 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
DevOps by REBRAIN @rebrain_devops · 28,720 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
MikroTik-сэнсэй @mikrotik_sensei · 19,662 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 October 2026
Linux для чайника @os_linux_ru · 19,526 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 1 October 2026
Серверная Админа | Компьютерные сети @school_network · 26,411 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 September 2026
Selectel @Selectel · 62,423 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Bash Days | Linux | DevOps @bashdays · 23,621 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
remontka.pro ✅ @remontka_pro · 26,328 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 September 2026
[404] — программирование @procode404 · 40,060 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
TechNews @techlucker · 42,607 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
Библиотека программиста (книги для разработчиков) @programmist_of · 20,570 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 5 October 2026
infosec @it_secur · 63,440 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Бункер Хакера @book_academ · 21,293 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 23 September 2026
Базы данных | Access, SQL, Big Data @databases_secrets · 30,000 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
Devops Jobs — вакансии и резюме @devops_jobs_feed · 22,291 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 September 2026
CMD | IT @cmd_it · 24,075 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Системный администратор” (@i_odmin), 26,699 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/i_odmin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.