2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 505–507 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 07:45
506
no change
10 Aug 2026, 07:31
506
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 6 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
112
Videos
22
Links
66
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
483 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
182
37.7%
custom 5852917659867287671
176
36.4%
custom 5408935401442267103
125
25.9%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 483reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2024 to 1 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 12 we hold a reading for · 58%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ave_mediator. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 December 2024 to 1 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Посмотрели мы посты коллег-пиарщиков и профессиональные чаты в день знаний. Все делятся своими школьными фоточками и воспоминаниями. Увидели одну закономерность: львиная доля медийщиков да пиарщиков в школе хотели стать… следователями! Чего греха таить — среди зумеров, которые работают в связях с общественностью, такая тяга тоже была. Помним наши детские намерения расследовать преступления после просмотра Каневского,…
Как Пушкина зумерам продавали
Знаем, что коллеги-миллениалы не согласятся. Но пиарщики-зумеры считают: пиар Александра Сергеевича удался. Учить стихи в виде речитатива — лучше, чем не учить совсем. Слушать The Hatters на фоне произведений великого поэта молодёжи зайдёт больше, чем слушать классику. А одновременно играть в большой теннис, читать рэп и вести переговоры хотят научиться все многозадачные зумеры. Поэтому…
🎄 Публикуем предновогоднюю папку с телеграм-каналами, которые пишут о молодёжи и для молодёжи. Здесь минимум официальных, и много персональных и командных каналов, где делятся личной позицией, интересами и отношениями молодёжи и системы.
Благодарим каждого автора за искренность и вовлеченность
Забирайте папку себе 🌟
The shares total 145%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
📱 VK уверенно импортозамещает замедленные площадки
Платформа представила итоги потребления видеоконтента в 2024 году. Из хороших маркеров: авторов становится больше, как и установок приложения — за год его загрузили 44 млн раз.
А насколько контент оказался востребованным?
Рекорд платформы — 2,9 млрд просмотров за сутки (население земного шара в 1960-м году).
🎥 Успех платформы во многом зависел от раскрутки эксклю…
В современном мире PR-специалисты борются с кризисами брендов и репутации, но если мы обратим взгляд в историю, то обнаружим, что принципы антикризисного PR возникли задолго до появления классических СМИ и социальных сетей.
📌 Египет: контроль над нарративом
Фараоны умели управлять своим имиджем даже в условиях кризисов, например, в периоды засухи или неурожая. Одним из инструментов был контроль над письменностью и в…
📢Новый уровень спортивного маркетинга
🔺Группа агентств JAMI LUP стала стратегическим партнёром «Газпром-Медиа Холдинга» по спортивному маркетингу. Теперь бренды, заинтересованные в спортивной рекламе, смогут получить доступ ко всем активам холдинга — от телеканалов до онлайн-платформ.
🔺Почему это важно?
Спортивная реклама — это не просто тренд, а возможность для брендов объединить эмоции, динамику и аудиторию, увле…
📢 Говорит Медиатор!
Когда информация передается так, что одновременно задействованы текст, звук и изображение — это не магия, а «Мультимодальность»! Благодаря ей сложные темы становятся доступнее, и каждый получает информацию в удобном формате, будь то видео, аудио или инфографика.
🎧 Внемли моим словам, чтобы узнать, как объединение форматов помогает доносить идеи так, чтобы их сумел понять каждый: от любителей тра…
На связи Медиатор!
Выходные — идеальный шанс отдохнуть и перезагрузиться. Читай книги из подборки и проводи время с пользой!
📖 Игорь Манн, Марина Горкина, Андрей Мамонтов.
«PR на 100%. Как стать хорошим менеджером по PR»
В книге ты найдешь только практические инструменты, которые нужны каждому пиарщику
📖 Игорь Рейхман.
«Практика медиаизмерений. Аудит, отчетность, оценка эффективности PR»
🔺параметры коммуникационн…
📢Новая кровь пиара
Соратники Медиатора дали интервью «Связям с ответственностью» о взгляде на пиар снизу со стороны зумеров.
Ответы — в карточках👆
Аве Медиатору!
📢 На связи Медиатор!
Продолжаю серию постов, посвященных интересным PR-кейсам.
В апреле 1914 года на угольной шахте компании «Рокфеллер» в Колорадо произошла трагедия, в результате которой погибли более 75 рабочих, множество людей было ранено. Этот инцидент вызвал широкий общественный резонанс и протесты против методов работы компании и ее подхода к безопасности труда.
Какие действия были предприняты пиарщиком Ро…
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ave_mediator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 145%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2024 to 1 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,168,018 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ave_mediator named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@zanozavzadnitce named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Медиатор” (@ave_mediator), 506 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ave_mediator.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
