لعیا زنگنه و رامین پرچمی میگن پارسا پیروزفر چون خوش چهره و خوش تیپ بوده کلی از سکانس هاشو تو سریال در پناه تو حذف کردن و در نهایت گریمش کردن و لباساشو عوض کردن تا کمتر خوشتیپ باشه 🆑 @kh_fouri 🇮🇷
😐12😱8❤2

Channel
@Kh_fouri
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
124,241subscribers
-276 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001395114356 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Kh_fouri |
| Description | 🔴تلاش ما نشر اخبار صحیح است. 🔹رسانه ای مردمی 🔴سلب مسئولیت 🔴 : محتوای تبلیغات نه تایید و نه رد میشود.مسئولیت استفاده از تبلیغات به عهده کانال خبر فوری ایران نمی باشد 🔺ادمین تبلیغات : @Kh_fouri_tb |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Kh_fouri |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 10 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @channele_khabar/3695577 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC | @Kh_fouri/371698 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC | 0.98 | 51 minutes |
| @channele_khabar/3695687 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC | @Kh_fouri/371709 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC | 0.97 | 39 minutes |
| @channele_khabar/3695357 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC | @Kh_fouri/371676 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC | 0.96 | 9 minutes |
| @channele_khabar/3693295 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC | @Kh_fouri/371566 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC | 0.94 | 16 minutes |
| @channele_khabar/3695047 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC | @Kh_fouri/371685 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC | 0.93 | 5.6 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @channele_khabar | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.96 | 49 minutes | @channele_khabar (5–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 4 of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 57 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 10, the earliest publisher we hold is @channele_khabar. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 9 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 124,241 | -54 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 124,295 | -46 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 124,341 | -30 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 124,371 | -62 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 124,433 | -42 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 124,475 | -38 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:51 | 124,513 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 124,517 | first reading |
240 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 203 of 240 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 240 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 477,584 |
| Reactions total | 1,742 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 55 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,631 reactions across 186 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 477 | 29.2% | |
| ❤ | 416 | 25.5% | |
| 👍 | 363 | 22.3% | |
| 👏 | 156 | 9.56% | |
| 😐 | 75 | 4.60% | |
| 🤩 | 52 | 3.19% | |
| 😱 | 41 | 2.51% | |
| 😭 | 24 | 1.47% | |
| 💔 | 20 | 1.23% | |
| 🫡 | 5 | 0.307% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 0.123% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 203 of the 240 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,742reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 240 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
لعیا زنگنه و رامین پرچمی میگن پارسا پیروزفر چون خوش چهره و خوش تیپ بوده کلی از سکانس هاشو تو سریال در پناه تو حذف کردن و در نهایت گریمش کردن و لباساشو عوض کردن تا کمتر خوشتیپ باشه 🆑 @kh_fouri 🇮🇷
😐12😱8❤2
♦️ نیویورکتایمز: 🔹 در طول ۵ روز پر تنش در ماه گذشته، ایران سامانههای دفاعی ۳ پایگاه آمریکا در اردن را زیر فشار حملات سنگین قرار داد 🔹 در روز پنجم، ایرانیها سرانجام از این سد دفاعی عبور کردند 🔹 ایران با ادامه جنگ به رقیبی ماهرتر و کارآزمودهتر تبدیل شده و به تدریج یاد گرفته چگونه از پدافند هوایی آمریکا عبور کند 🔹 پنتاگون ۱۵۰۰ موشک رهگیر پاتریوت مصرف کرده و اکنون کمتر از ۱۷۰۰ موشک رهگیر در اختیار دارد / انتخاب …
❤7👎5👍1
⭐️ استارز و پرمیوم تلگرام با کمترین قیمت بازار 🚀 ✅ تحویل کاملاً خودکار در کمتر از ۱۰ ثانیه ⭐️ خرید استارز، پرمیوم و 🎁گیفت تلگرام 🌍 شماره مجازی کشورهای مختلف 💰 قیمتهای رقابتی و ارزانتر از بازار 🔥 هزاران سفارش موفق و تحویل فوری! 🛡️ پشتیبانی ۲۴ ساعته همین الان ربات رو استارت کن:👇 🔗 https://t.me/JetPremBot?start=ref1583515722
❤1
کرۀ شمالی موشک بالستیک آزمایش کرد 🔹وزارت دفاع ژاپن و ستاد مشترک ارتش کرۀ جنوبی اعلام کردند که حداقل یک فروند موشک بالستیک از منطقۀ «وونسان» در کرۀ شمالی به سمت دریای شرقی شلیک شده است. 🔸این پرتابهای موشکی کرۀ شمالی در حالی انجام شد که قرار است کرۀ جنوبی و آمریکا رزمایش مشترک سالانۀ مهم خود را هفتۀ آینده آغاز کنند./فارس 🆑 @kh_fouri 🇮🇷
👎2👍1
تحلیل مشاور قالیباف از اوضاع کنونی ایران و آمریکا مهدی محمدی، مشاور راهبردی رئیس مجلس: 🔹الان آرامش قبل از طوفان است. 🔹آمریکا و اسرائیل به دنبال خلق لحظه صفر هستند؛ تلفیق یک ضربه نظامی نمادین با ایجاد آشوب مسلحانه در ایران. 🔹این بار در ایران تصمیم شکل گرفته که پیروزی نباید مرحلهبندی شود؛ هدف، پیروزی قاطع برای احیای کامل بازدارندگی است. 🔹ما توانستهایم محیط جنگ را آنگونه که میخواهیم بچینیم؛ زمان، مکان و گستره د…
👎4❤3👍2😐1
🔴 اگر بخوای شغل دوم آنلاینت رو شروع کنی، اولین چالشت چیه؟ 1️⃣ نمیدونم از کجا شروع کنم 2️⃣ وقت زیادی ندارم و دنبال یه مسیر قابل اجرا کنار کارم هستم 3️⃣ سرمایه زیادی ندارم و میخوام کمریسک شروع کنم 4️⃣ بین مدلهای مختلف شغل آنلاین نمیدونم کدوم مناسب منه ✅ فرقی نمیکنه الان شاغلی، دانشجویی یا دنبال یه مسیر درآمدزایی آنلاین هستی؛ ما یک آزمون طراحی کردیم که بهت نشون میده بین چند مدل شغل آنلاین، کدومش با شرایط، زما…
کنایه مرشایمر به ادعای ترامپ درباره تنگه هرمز جان مرشایمر، استاد علوم سیاسی دانشگاه شیکاگو: 🔹ترامپ هرگز شکست را نمیپذیرد و همیشه مدعی پیروزی است. 🔹او بهخوبی میداند که نه خودش و نه آمریکا کنترل تنگه هرمز را در اختیار ندارند، بلکه ایرانیها بر این آبراه تسلط کامل دارند. 🔹دولت ترامپ با خروج احمقانه از تفاهمنامه اسلامآباد، این سند را به سطل زباله تاریخ فرستاد و اکنون در برابر مطالبات ایران راهبردی ندارد. 🔹واشنگ…
👍8👎3❤2
♦️ خبرنگار الجزیره: 🔹 در مورد تنگه هرمز و مذاکرات، اوضاع دوباره به نقطه اول بازگشته و توپ همچنان در زمین آمریکا است 🔹 ممکن است که میانجیگریها در روزهای آینده اهمیت زیادی داشته باشند / انتخاب 🆑 @kh_fouri 🇮🇷
🔴 نیویورک تایمز گزارش داده که آمریکا توی یک روز حدود ۵۰ فروند موشک رهگیر پاتریوت رو در خاورمیانه شلیک کرده که هزینه هر کدومشون حدود ۴ میلیون دلاره. یک کارشناس گفته ترامپ فکر میکرد جنگ کوتاه میشه و ذخایر این موشکها به خطر نمیافته. 🆑 @kh_fouri 🇮🇷
👎2👏1
حملات رژیم صهیونیستی به جنوب لبنان 🔹ارتش رژیم صهیونیستی در دور تازه حملات متجاوزانهاش، حملات هوایی و توپخانهای را به مناطقی در جنوب لبنان انجام داد. 🆑 @kh_fouri 🇮🇷
❤2👎2
🎥 مشاهدات میدانی از آلودگی نفتی در ساحل جنوبی شهر سوزای قشم 🆑 @kh_fouri 🇮🇷
😭4
مخالفت عربستان با پیوستن مصر به «توافق دفاعی مکه» 🔹گزارش میدلایستآی از یک تحول راهبردی خبر میدهد که ابعاد تنشهای پنهان میان قاهره و ریاض را آشکار میکند؛ عربستان سعودی علیرغم فشار آنکارا، با ورود مصر به توافق دفاعی مشترک با ترکیه و پاکستان که هفته گذشته در مکه امضا شد، مخالفت کرده است./ایسنا 🆑 @kh_fouri 🇮🇷
Showing the 12 most recent of 240 posts we hold for @Kh_fouri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Kh_fouri edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 168,958 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📣 خبر فوری ایران💯” (@Kh_fouri), 124,241 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kh_fouri.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.