Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for REAZIONI AVVERSE "VACCINI" COVID-19

Channel

REAZIONI AVVERSE "VACCINI" COVID-19

@curadomiciliaretempestivacovid19

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,789subscribers

-46 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001458423380
TypeChannel
Username@curadomiciliaretempestivacovid19
Created1 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/curadomiciliaretempestivacovid19

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

4,7894,8354,8127 August 2026 — 4,835 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,835 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,833 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,822 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,819 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,811 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,813 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4,809 subscribers1 September 2026 — 4,805 subscribers5 September 2026 — 4,804 subscribers10 September 2026 — 4,797 subscribers14 September 2026 — 4,792 subscribers18 September 2026 — 4,794 subscribers28 September 2026 — 4,789 subscribers7 August 202628 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 52 days, net -46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,782–4,842 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 09:364,789-5
18 Sept 2026, 08:424,794+2
14 Sept 2026, 12:194,792-5
10 Sept 2026, 13:594,797-7
5 Sept 2026, 18:374,804-1
1 Sept 2026, 23:364,805-4
29 Aug 2026, 18:564,809-4
27 Aug 2026, 03:124,813+2
24 Aug 2026, 10:044,811-8
20 Aug 2026, 08:424,819-3
13 Aug 2026, 23:164,822-11
10 Aug 2026, 18:254,833-2
7 Aug 2026, 18:174,835no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:064,835first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 40 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17m 36s
Average length
2m 31s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1327.1%
👏1327.1%
❤1122.9%
🔥1122.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC110 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @monicaelisPhoto

"In diversi paesi di vari continenti, si stanno diffondendo la registrazione obbligatoria degli animali da allevamento, l'identificazione e i passaporti digitali, nonché il monitoraggio di aziende agricole e terreni privati ​​tramite droni. Africa, Asia o Europa: le giustificazioni variano, ma ovunque il risultato è lo stesso: ogni pollo e ogni popolazione animale, per quanto piccola, deve essere registrata in un reg…

Signed barbara

11 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC111 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @radio28tvVideo

I documenti che Pfizer ha cercato di nascondere per 75 anni vi faranno gelare il sangue nelle vene 270 donne incinte sono state vaccinate nell'ambito dello studio di Pfizer. 234 di queste cartelle cliniche relative alla gravidanza sono completamente SPARITE. Questo è un INSABBIAMENTO. Delle 36 donne che sono state effettivamente monitorate, oltre l'80% HA PERSO I PROPRI BAMBINI, e Pfizer lo sapeva. Pfizer e i suoi…

Signed barbara

11 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC130 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @curenaturalidottmartucci

La pressione sanguigna è al centro di un gigantesco inganno globale orchestrato da una casta di medici oscuri, volto a trasformare l’umanità in una cliente dipendente da farmaci a vita. Attraverso lo spostamento sistematico dei parametri clinici e il silenzio sui rimedi delle antiche civiltà, questo sistema governa i corpi e le menti. 🔥 Cronologia dell'Inganno della Pressione • 1940: Pressione normale considerata 2…

Signed barbara

11 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC195 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @radio28tv

Studio scioccante: i terreni contaminati da pesticidi rischiano di far morire di fame l'umanità, distruggendo il microbioma del suolo e compromettendo l'assorbimento dei nutrienti Cosa succederebbe se proprio le sostanze chimiche utilizzate per proteggere la nostra produzione alimentare, invece, distruggessero sistematicamente le fondamenta stesse della vita? Mentre le autorità di controllo e le aziende chimiche si …

Signed barbara

11 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC210 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Un informatore scioccante proveniente dal sistema ospedaliero ha lanciato un grave avvertimento: il termine “vaccino” sta scomparendo silenziosamente dai moduli di consenso medico, sostituito dall’ampia e ingannevole categoria di “biologico” o “biogenico”. In base a questa nuova classificazione, ai pazienti potrebbero essere iniettati vaccini e altri prodotti biologici senza il loro esplicito consenso, anche quando s…

👍1

Signed barbara

11 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC196 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @nova_civitasPhoto

Dichiarazione azienda avicola Cosaro di San Tonino di Malo (VI)

Signed barbara

11 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC201 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @nova_civitasVideo

DOVE DIAVOLO SONO FINITI TUTTI I PASSEGGERI DELLA NAVE DA CROCIERA COLPITA DALL'HANTAVIRUS? Ricordate la nave da crociera colpita da una letale epidemia di hantavirus all'inizio di quest'anno? Decine di passeggeri sono scesi dalla nave prima ancora che l'epidemia venisse confermata. Altri sono stati fatti partire in aereo silenziosamente, sotto stretta sorveglianza. Quando finalmente sono sbarcati in Spagna, pers…

Signed barbara

11 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC201 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @omeopatia22Video

Ogni giorno prendi la tua bottiglia d’acqua. Ma se stesse lentamente danneggiando la tua salute senza che tu lo sappia? Molte bottiglie popolari sono realizzate con materiali che rilasciano tossine invisibili. Sostanze chimiche che possono alterare l’equilibrio ormonale e danneggiare le cellule. Alex Sharma, esperto di tossicologia ambientale, rivela una verità sconvolgente: dietro l’idratazione quotidiana si nascond…

Signed barbara

11 Aug 2026, 08:53 UTC219 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤2

Signed barbara

11 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC209 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @nova_civitasPhoto

L’azienda Rana di Verona risponde alle richieste di chiarezza rispetto all’utilizzo di prodotti provenienti dagli allevamenti del pilota per i vaccini sperimentali per l’Aviaria. Poco gli è stato chiesto da chi si approvvigiona di uova

Signed barbara

9 Aug 2026, 20:22 UTC285 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @lagentecomenoiterniVideo

Audit_Progetto_H5.mp4

Signed barbara

9 Aug 2026, 20:22 UTC297 viewsread 12 August 2026

DOSSIER AVIARIA H5: L’AUTOGOL DEI DIFENSORI DEL PROGETTO PILOTA – Trilly APS la gente come noi https://www.trillyapslagentecomenoi.it/dossier-aviaria-h5-lautogol-dei-difensori-del-progetto-pilota/

Signed barbara

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @curadomiciliaretempestivacovid19. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

C.Li.Va. Toscana
@clivatoscana · 21,523
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 September 2026
Danni Collaterali
@dannicollateralivaccinocovid · 28,837
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 9 September 2026
Border Nights (ufficiale)
@BorderNightsOfficial · 27,060
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“REAZIONI AVVERSE "VACCINI" COVID-19” (@curadomiciliaretempestivacovid19), 4,789 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/curadomiciliaretempestivacovid19.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.