Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Loris Palmerini

Channel

Loris Palmerini

@lorispal

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

241subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001600975670
TypeChannel
Username@lorispal
CreatedBetween 1 November 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/lorispal

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@lorispal/624 · this entry29 Jul 2026, 07:32 UTC@repubblica_info/100629 Jul 2026, 07:32 UTC1.00under a minute
@lorispal/624 · this entry29 Jul 2026, 07:32 UTC@venetanews/362729 Jul 2026, 07:32 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@repubblica_info8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.99under a minute@repubblica_info (7–1)
@venetanews5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.99under a minutethis entry (4–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 13 comparable posts for this entry, running 26 April 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @lorispal — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

238241239.57 August 2026 — 240 subscribers8 August 2026 — 240 subscribers15 August 2026 — 239 subscribers6 September 2026 — 238 subscribers13 September 2026 — 239 subscribers11 October 2026 — 240 subscribers18 October 2026 — 241 subscribers1 November 2026 — 240 subscribers7 November 2026 — 241 subscribers7 August 20267 November 2026
9 measurements spanning 91 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 238–241 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 06:29241+1
1 Nov 2026, 05:48240-1
18 Oct 2026, 17:26241+1
11 Oct 2026, 15:00240+1
13 Sept 2026, 01:17239+1
6 Sept 2026, 03:16238-1
15 Aug 2026, 04:52239-1
8 Aug 2026, 09:48240no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:54240first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14m 59s
Average length
2m 30s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤421.1%
👍421.1%
😡315.8%
👏210.5%
🔥210.5%
🏆15.26%
😱15.26%
🤬15.26%
🤮15.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC494 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Approvato il primo vaccino antinfluenzale mRNA Oggi 5 agosto 2026 la Reuters da notizia che la Food and Drug Administration (FDA USA) ha approvato mFlusiva, un nuovo vaccino contro l'influenza per le persone di età pari o superiore a 50 anni, un vaccino a base di RNA messaggero, prodotto da MODERNA. Ha un'approvazione tradizionale per gli adulti di età compresa tra 50 e 64 anni, e un'approvazione accelerata per q…

👏1

Signed Loris Palmerini

6 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC24 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Riflette_RePhoto

Dal diario di Anthony Fauci, 13 agosto 2022: "Abbiamo convinto il CDC a non dichiarare che i vaccini non hanno alcuna efficacia nel prevenire infezione e contagio." "Il motivo è che questa dichiarazione contraddirebbe la raccomandazione alla popolazione di farsi inoculare il vaccino BA.5 bivalente a settembre. Inoltre, minerebbe gli sforzi del Dipartimento di Giustizia per rendere obbligatoria la vaccinazione." Ave…

Signed Loris Palmerini

29 Jul 2026, 07:32 UTC188 viewsread 8 August 2026

🔹https://t.me/MedBedsTechnologyNews/2551 UN EX DIRIGENTE DELLA PFIZER HA APPENA VIOLATO IL SUO ACCORDO DI RISERVATEZZA. FACEVANO PARTE DEL "TEAM ACQUISIZIONI" CHE ACQUISTAVA E NASCONDEVA I BREVETTI DI MEDBED. Ha lavorato nel settore delle acquisizioni aziendali per 12 anni. Il suo compito non era sviluppare cure. Il suo compito era trovare persone che avessero la cura, acquistare i loro brevetti e custodirli in una…

Signed Loris Palmerini

29 Jul 2026, 07:20 UTC48 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ilrisvegliodellafeniceVideo

PER BUONA PACE DEI COVIDIOTI PENTADOSATI Ancora una volta avevamo ragione, ora lo dice pure una perizia ufficiale. ✋Seguici ➡️ t.me/ilrisvegliodellafenice -------

👍1

Signed Loris Palmerini

28 Jul 2026, 15:27 UTC254 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://palmerini.net/blog/come-il-pascolo-rigenerativo-combatte-il-cambiamento-climatico/

👏1

Signed Loris Palmerini

27 Jul 2026, 16:02 UTC41 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @repubblica_info

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/KOUt6cM2YMs

Signed Loris Palmerini

27 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC51 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @necrologiavacciniPhoto

NUOVE DISPOSIZIONI DEL MINISTARO DEL CANCRO E MORTE Ordine per i medici di non usare più la dicitura “MORTE IMPROVVISA” Allora sarebbe meglio scrivere : arresto cardiaco improvviso o a singhiozzo, O SEMPLICEMENTE “SOGGETTO DECEDUTO” L’importante è non dire la causa, nascondere la verità ai cittadini. QUESTO È UN SEGNALE GRAVE DI INTERFERENZA SULLA LIBERTÀ DEL MEDICO, INTERFERENZA DI STATO, LO STATO COLPEVOLE DEL…

🤬1

Signed Loris Palmerini

15 Jul 2026, 16:22 UTC88 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @effetticollateraliVideo

✡️ CHAT CONTROL RITORNA ✡️

🔥1

Signed Loris Palmerini

14 Jul 2026, 13:14 UTC95 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @notizie_resistenza_no_reset

https://substack.com/home/post/p-205006491 Sintesi del documento L'articolo riporta le gravi critiche mosse da Martin Kulldorff, ex docente ad Harvard e rinomato biostatistico, riguardo ai dati sulla sicurezza del vaccino contro il Papillomavirus umano (Gardasil) prodotto dall'azienda farmaceutica Merck. Punti fondamentali: Manipolazione dei dati: Kulldorff sostiene che le analisi scientifiche utilizzate dall…

👍1😱1

Signed Loris Palmerini

5 Jul 2026, 09:21 UTC106 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @nova_civitas

COLLASSO DI STATO: IL "VUOTO TOSSICOLOGICO" NEI POLLI OGM 🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓 CHE FINISCONO SULLE NOSTRE TAVOLE 🚨 La rassicurante narrativa secondo cui la vaccinazione avicola di massa in Italia sia un'operazione ordinaria, trasparente e priva di rischi si è appena schiantata contro i documenti ufficiali degli stessi enti pubblici. L’Associazione Trilly APS ha sollevato il velo sul silenzio istituzionale tramite un’istanza di Acce…

❤1🔥1

Signed Loris Palmerini

5 Jul 2026, 08:58 UTC102 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

La sentenza della Corte di Giustizia dell'Unione Europea (CGUE) nella causa C-67/25 (caso *Traugott Ickeroth*), emessa il 2 luglio 2026, è una decisione cruciale che definisce i confini dell'applicazione delle sanzioni contro i media statali russi nell'Unione Europea. Ecco i punti chiave della decisione: ### L'oggetto della causa La controversia (originata da un rinvio pregiudiziale della procura di Saarbrücken, in G…

🤮1

Signed Loris Palmerini

12 Jun 2026, 09:04 UTC126 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vocidatelegramVideo

Video, posted without a caption

👍1

Signed Loris Palmerini

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lorispal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Loris Palmerini” (@lorispal), 241 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lorispal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.