Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for where

Channel

where

@zicelaqoll

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

207subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001794502285
TypeChannel
Username@zicelaqoll
CreatedBetween 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zicelaqoll

Growth

2072112097 August 2026 — 211 subscribers8 August 2026 — 211 subscribers14 August 2026 — 210 subscribers20 August 2026 — 209 subscribers27 August 2026 — 208 subscribers12 September 2026 — 207 subscribers7 August 202612 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 36 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 206–212 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 08:20207-1
27 Aug 2026, 23:07208-1
20 Aug 2026, 16:15209-1
14 Aug 2026, 13:14210-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:02211no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:14211first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 March 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,115 reactions across 19 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
40136.0%
🔥38134.2%
👍13812.4%
💯332.96%
312.78%
❤‍🔥252.24%
👏201.79%
🤔171.52%
👀131.17%
🥰90.807%
🏆80.717%
😁70.628%
🙏70.628%
😨50.448%
😢30.269%
🦄30.269%
20.179%
20.179%
😱20.179%
🤡20.179%
6 further kinds60.538%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,115 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2024 to 7 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 May 2024, 20:50 UTC≈1,230 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ОК. Идея данного проекта была в целом показать самому себе и вам как работает система "менять правила на ходу". Не было четких установок, а уж тем более все менялось так быстро, что становилось скучно. Уверен, что момент с ограничением общения между участников с целью решения загадки - убило атмосферу коллектива. В целом весь этот проект - эксперимент. Я сделал вывод, что такие загадки можно организовывать, но нужн

🔥15👍8👏62👾1🤩1

7 May 2024, 20:34 UTC848 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мы подвели итоги, осталось лишь написать красивый пост. Среди тех, кто был лучше всех будет распределено 250 USDT. Итоги будут раскрыты сегодня.

🔥104❤‍🔥2

5 May 2024, 13:52 UTC874 views50 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Наше путешествие по островам закончилось. Пора подводить итоги. 🤩

🔥319🏆8👍2

21 Mar 2024, 08:39 UTC≈2,010 views91 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Легкие времена будут не всегда. Вам нужна подсказка?

🔥61🤔12👍9💯6🦄3

6 Mar 2024, 17:23 UTC≈2,990 views361 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @TonDreamerrPhoto

🍰Добро пожаловать на следующий остров 🌐То, что вы ищите, намного ближе, чем кажется. 📰Для получения новой загадки вам нужно набрать 555❤️ #where

343👍9❤‍🔥7🤡2

6 Mar 2024, 15:17 UTC≈2,890 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Хороший ключ открывает много дверей, а не одну. Вторая часть найдена.

👍154❤‍🔥3👌1

6 Mar 2024, 07:37 UTC≈2,520 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Буду говорить четко, ясно. Мне не нужны посредники. Если вы хотите играть не по правилам - ваши части будут утеряны и вы больше не сможете принять участие дальше. Работая в коллективе знайте, что ваши знания могут выставить за свои, и тогда в пролете будете вы, а не тот кто вами воспользовался и часть монеты будет у его. Никому здесь нечестность не нужна. Работайте наедине с собой и своим разумом, и не говорите нико

🔥17👍8🤔3😱21💯1🤝1😇1

5 Mar 2024, 18:56 UTC≈28,100 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Теперь у нашего поезда каждый вагон движется по отдельности. Мы не сможем постоянно сидеть в одном купе все вместе и навсегда, у каждого своя остановка. Если вы продвинулись быстрее, чем остальные - не говорите им об этом, дайте знать нам @wejustneedmoney Мы не ищем посредников, и тех, кто нагло будет лгать. Мы хотим честный выигрыш. https://t.me/theapplab/163

👍6🥰2

4 Mar 2024, 21:05 UTC≈1,840 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вы нашли первую часть монеты. Будьте готовы к тому, что вы уже будете не в одном вагоне. Вы потвердили свою теорию в воскресенье, но те буквы которые вы нашли - вам еще пригодятся. Просто будьте готовы. Завтра.

👍18🔥843

4 Mar 2024, 20:29 UTC≈1,820 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Судя по всему идя по верному пути вы споткнулись об камень. Постарайтесь смотреть под ноги чтобы потом в моменте не остановиться.

👀13👍6🥰4

3 Mar 2024, 18:18 UTC≈1,950 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вкусный тортик надо кушать по кусочкам.

237👍7

3 Mar 2024, 11:50 UTC≈2,240 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Да не оскудеет рука дающего.

💯2610👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zicelaqoll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“where” (@zicelaqoll), 207 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zicelaqoll.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.