Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Наука Успеха | Мотивация | Бизнес

Channel

Наука Успеха | Мотивация | Бизнес

@naykaycnexa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

50,189subscribers

-177 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001920746784
TypeChannel
Username@naykaycnexa
Description80% успеха - это подписаться на наш канал. Менеджер: @karimovv00
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/naykaycnexa

Growth

50,18950,36650,277.57 August 2026 — 50,366 subscribers8 August 2026 — 50,331 subscribers9 August 2026 — 50,316 subscribers10 August 2026 — 50,300 subscribers11 August 2026 — 50,291 subscribers12 August 2026 — 50,280 subscribers13 August 2026 — 50,253 subscribers14 August 2026 — 50,211 subscribers16 August 2026 — 50,189 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 9 days, net -177. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50,162–50,393 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 02:4850,189-22
14 Aug 2026, 14:1550,211-42
13 Aug 2026, 02:2350,253-27
12 Aug 2026, 01:3350,280-11
11 Aug 2026, 03:0150,291-9
10 Aug 2026, 06:0050,300-16
9 Aug 2026, 04:1250,316-15
8 Aug 2026, 02:5550,331-35
7 Aug 2026, 05:0250,366first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
788
Videos
4
Links
661

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2,496 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,38155.3%
👍52020.8%
🔥40516.2%
💯582.32%
👏391.56%
❤‍🔥341.36%
🤣160.641%
🙏90.361%
🥰90.361%
😁60.24%
50.2%
🤔40.16%
👎20.08%
🕊20.08%
😍20.08%
10.04%
🍓10.04%
👀10.04%
👻10.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,496reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2026 to 2 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @naykaycnexa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 February 2026 to 2 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Apr 2026, 19:45 UTC≈10,300 views181 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026
Photo

Они тебя выбрали! Встаешь утром и говоришь перед зеркалом, что деньги тебя выбрали. По-началу будете говорить: дурак что-ли? А потом оттуда деньги пришли, там больше заработал. Образы шикарной жизни станут привычными, а финансовые возможности расширятся. 🔥 — если будет так!

🔥13926👍15😍1

31 Mar 2026, 19:16 UTC≈8,830 views96 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Один из фермеров в сельской Ирландии обнаружил, что одна из его коров плакала часами, когда он уезжал за продуктами на поезде, поэтому начал брать её с собой на вокзал. Удивительно, но корова, кажется, поняла рутину. С этого дня она спокойно ждала на вокзале, пока не вернётся его поезд, а потом с радостью провожала его домой. История тронула людей по всему миру, напомнив нам, что коровы это не просто животные на фе

78👍12🔥5😁1

30 Mar 2026, 18:35 UTC≈7,590 views77 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

📱 Альберт Эйнштейн 🗣 Альберт Эйнштейн не умел говорить, пока ему не исполнилось четыре года, и не читал, пока ему не исполнилось семь. 👨‍👩‍👦 Его родители и учителя думали, что он был не просто медленным, а умственно отсталым и антиобщественным. 🏫 Он был исключен из школы, а также ему было отказано в допуске в Цюрихский политехникум. 🧠 Теперь Эйнштейн является именем нарицательным, синонимом «гений» – получивший п

56👏14🔥5👍2

26 Mar 2026, 19:24 UTC≈8,390 views128 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Есть старая поговорка: 🧲 Из-за незабитого гвоздя потеряли подкову, 🐎 Из-за потерянной подковы лишились коня, 📜 Из-за лишенного коня не доставили донесение, ⚔️ Из-за недоставленного донесения проиграли войну. Вывод: 💯 Делайте любую работу ответственно не зависимо от её важности или сложности. © Наука Успеха

75🔥20👍17💯15🤔1

26 Mar 2026, 13:29 UTC≈6,860 views68 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

💵 Урок о деньгах: 📱 Если что-то стоит $1000 и продается за $750, и вы решили купить это, думая, что вы сэкономили $250. 💸 На самом деле вы потратили $750 © Наука Успеха

44🔥20👍4

24 Mar 2026, 17:38 UTC≈6,770 views141 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

❤️‍🔥 - Если согласны

👍8026💯18❤‍🔥9🔥3😁3👏2

24 Mar 2026, 11:27 UTC≈6,590 views78 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Почему люди сдаются❓️ • Жалеют себя • Теряют веру в свои силы • Боятся провала • Ждут быстрого результата • Живут прошлым • Не верят в достижимость цели • Перерабатывают • Не хотят меняться • Верят, что они ни на что не способны • Бояться действовать • Сворачивают с пути при первой же неудаче ⚠️ Нельзя сдаваться не только после одного, но и после ста поражений. © Наука Успеха

65🔥7🥰3❤‍🔥1👍1🕊1

18 Mar 2026, 05:05 UTC≈9,010 views161 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

☀️ Обычное утро миллиардера: • Проснулся • Без замедлений встал с постели • Убрал телефон • 15 минут зарядки • Холодный душ • Почитал книгу • Полезный завтрак • Поставил цели на день • Начал выполнять цели 🤵 Вы должны уже сегодня относиться к себе как к человеку, добившемуся успеха.

93👍39🤣16🔥7💯3❤‍🔥2😍1

13 Mar 2026, 13:48 UTC≈9,480 views202 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

👍🏻- Если хотели бы прокатиться по этой дорожке ночью.

👍124🔥4228❤‍🔥6🍓1👎1

8 Mar 2026, 14:29 UTC≈12,300 views150 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

😓 НЕУДОБНАЯ ПРАВДА, МНОГИЕ НЕ ПОНИМАЮТ 1. Семья, которую ты создаешь, важнее той, в которой ты родился 2. Тебя раздражает в других то, что ты себе не разрешаешь 3. Всё через легкость - это уловка 4. Бесполезно искать себя - себя нужно создавать 5. Дети это важно, но не важнее тебя самого

102👍35🔥8👏4❤‍🔥1

7 Mar 2026, 15:36 UTC≈9,880 views183 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

❤️ - Если это тронуло вас

155🔥185👏5

2 Mar 2026, 11:47 UTC≈12,000 views79 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🙅🏻‍♀️ ВСЕ СПОСОБЫ СКАЗАТЬ НЕТ •неа •никак •простите •определенно нет •ни в коем случае •не стоит •Нет, спасибо! •думаю нет •К сожалению нет •мне некогда •нет возможности •не в этот раз •не мое, благодарю •это не по мне •Я пожалуй пас •не сегодня, но спасибо •хотелось бы, но никак •пока не до этого •может в другой раз •не интересует •если бы я могла! •было бы время •мне скоро уходить •боюсь,что не смогу •не думаю, чт

52👍17❤‍🔥5🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @naykaycnexa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 721,788 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Мышление Миллионера
@millionaire_thinks · 94,720
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 16 August 2026
Сила Слов (Мотивация | Саморазвитие, Книги)
@silaslovv · 112,343
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 14 August 2026
Закон Успеха | Бизнес, Подкасты
@zakonycnexatg · 111,258
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 August 2026
Финансович | Бизнес блог
@financovich · 139,195
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
Миллионы | Бизнес блог
@gain_business · 176,867
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 August 2026
Бизнес Кийосаки
@Business_University · 173,475
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026
Мастер Бизнеса
@master_businessa · 129,558
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026
Мысли богатых | бизнес блог
@misli_bogatich · 174,968
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Наука Успеха | Мотивация | Бизнес” (@naykaycnexa), 50,189 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/naykaycnexa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.