Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Биохакинг | Саморазвитие

@bioarcana

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

42,765subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002119880239
TypeChannel
Username@bioarcana
DescriptionМозг • энергия • здоровье • продуктивность Только то, что реально работает на практике Источники трафика: Закупы + 👇 Instagram (Biorevolutions) — 800K (пдп) Facebook — 585K TikTok — 251K YouTube — 160K Реклама: 👉 t.me/miffu22 Бот: @Biorekbot
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bioarcana

Growth

42,76542,84342,8047 August 2026 — 42,771 subscribers7 August 2026 — 42,771 subscribers8 August 2026 — 42,777 subscribers9 August 2026 — 42,816 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42,843 subscribers11 August 2026 — 42,835 subscribers12 August 2026 — 42,817 subscribers13 August 2026 — 42,805 subscribers14 August 2026 — 42,765 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,753–42,855 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 08:2742,765-40
13 Aug 2026, 02:0542,805-12
12 Aug 2026, 02:4242,817-18
11 Aug 2026, 04:3142,835-8
10 Aug 2026, 05:5742,843+27
9 Aug 2026, 08:1142,816+39
8 Aug 2026, 04:5642,777+6
7 Aug 2026, 05:1442,771no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:0242,771first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.76%
avg views ÷ 42,765 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,170
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held26 (25 July 202613 August 2026)
Views total100,180
Reactions total2,485
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
938
Videos
180
Links
909

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,485 reactions across 24 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,62865.5%
69928.1%
🔥572.29%
👏421.69%
210.845%
💯170.684%
👌100.402%
😱70.282%
🏆40.161%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,485reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 24 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bioarcana. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC≈1,730 views77 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Как ты дышишь прямо сейчас? ⚪️ Если ты дышишь грудью (плечи поднимаются), это сигнал стресса для организма. ⚪️ Такое дыхание поддерживает высокий уровень кортизола и не даёт телу расслабиться. ➡️ Положи одну руку на грудь, другую на живот. Дыши так, чтобы двигался только живот. Это мгновенно включает режим восстановления. Ставь «👍», если было полезно. ⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️ ◾ Биохакинг

👍6016🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC≈2,400 views80 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Еда перед экраном ⚪️ Мозг занят картинкой, а не едой. Он не фиксирует процесс насыщения. ⚪️ В итоге ты съедаешь гораздо больше, чем нужно, и всё равно хочешь есть через час. ➡️ Убери гаджеты. Ешь в тишине, концентрируясь на вкусе. Насыщение придёт быстрее, а переедание исчезнет. Ставь «👍», если было полезно. ⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️ ◾ Биохакинг

👍6213🔥3💯2

10 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC≈2,730 views101 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Планирования своего дня ⚪️ Если в списке 10+ задач — это не план, а список желаний. Мозг видит огромный объём и впадает в прокрастинацию. ⚪️ Вечером кажется, что сил много, но утром энергия кончается на первой же задаче. ➡️ Выписывай на день только 3 главные задачи. Остальное — бонусом, если останется время. Так ты будешь чувствовать себя победителем, а не неудачником. Ставь «👍», если было полезно. ⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️

👍6932

9 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC≈3,340 views83 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Правильно просыпаться ⚪️ Если ты «досыпаешь» 5–10 минут по будильнику, ты обманываешь мозг. Он начинает новый цикл сна, который прерывается, и ты чувствуешь себя разбитым. ⚪️ Это называется инерция сна. Твой мозг не понимает, проснулся он или нет. ➡️ Поставь будильник подальше от кровати, чтобы пришлось встать. Или используй «умный» будильник, который отслеживает фазы сна. Ставь «👍», если было полезно. ⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️

👍6319😱1

8 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC≈3,370 views105 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Отдых после работы ⚪️ Если твой отдых — это скроллинг ленты или сериалы, мозг не отдыхает. Он просто переключается на другой поток информации. ⚪️ Это не перезагрузка, а смена задачи. В итоге усталость накапливается. ➡️ Попробуй прогулку без телефона, душ или 15 минут тишины с закрытыми глазами. Это реально перезагружает нервную систему. Ставь «👍», если было полезно. ⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️ ◾ Биохакинг

👍7720👏6🔥2

7 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC≈3,240 views69 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Твой внутренний диалог — это не ты ⚪️ Мысли в голове — это просто фоновый шум, к которому мы привыкли. Мозг постоянно генерирует идеи, страхи и планы. ⚪️ Когда ты веришь каждой мысли (особенно негативной), ты становишься её заложником. Тревога и усталость растут. ⚪️ Попробуй наблюдать за мыслями со стороны, как за облаками. Не борись с ними, просто замечай: «А, вот опять эта мысль». Это даёт мгновенное спокойствие

👍4424👏1

7 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈2,880 views5 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

📣 07.08.2026 — ЗАПУСК первого AI-Наставника в Telegram! Unpuzzle — твой персональный AI-наставник в Telegram. Напиши свою цель — за несколько минут AI-Наставник разложит её на конкретные действия и даст первое задание на сегодня. Начни путь к своему Успеху — напиши /start в боте. P.S. Кто сегодня активирует бота получит 7 дней PRO пробного периода. Успей, ведь через 48 часов ты больше нас не увидишь!

5

7 Aug 2026, 04:10 UTC≈3,130 views87 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

«Нет» — это законченное предложение ⚪️ Когда ты соглашаешься на всё из страха обидеть или показаться плохим, ты тратишь свой самый ценный ресурс — время и энергию. ⚪️ Постоянное «да» другим часто означает «нет» самому себе. Это прямой путь к выгоранию и тихой злости. ⚪️ Умение вежливо, но твёрдо отказывать, не эгоизм, а забота о своих границах. Это сохраняет твои силы для того, что действительно важно. Ставь «👍»,

👍6621

6 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC≈3,270 views64 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Сравнение себя с другими в соцсетях ⚪️ Ты сравниваешь свою «закулисную» жизнь (труд, сомнения, неудачи) с чужими «яркими моментами» (отфильтрованные фото, успехи). ⚪️ Это искажённая реальность, которая заставляет чувствовать себя хуже и отнимает радость от собственных достижений. ⚪️ Отпишись от тех, кто заставляет тебя чувствовать себя неполноценным. Сравнивай себя только с собой вчерашним. Ставь «👍», если было п

👍4813🔥3

5 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC≈3,620 views149 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Обида — это яд, который ты пьёшь сам ⚪️ Когда ты держишь обиду, ты снова и снова прокручиваешь в голове болезненную ситуацию, проживая её заново. ⚪️ Твой обидчик, возможно, давно забыл об этом, а ты продолжаешь наказывать себя стрессом и негативными эмоциями. ⚪️ Прощение — это не подарок другому. Это способ освободиться от груза и вернуть себе душевное равновесие. Ставь «👍», если было полезно. ⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪

👍12719👏3

4 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC≈3,580 views70 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Внутренний критик: твой самый строгий судья ⚪️Внутри каждого из нас живёт голос, который вечно недоволен. Он шепчет: «Мог бы лучше», «Кто ты такой, чтобы это делать?», «Опять не получится». ⚪️Мы привыкли считать этот голос частью себя, но это не так. Это просто набор старых страхов и чужих установок. ⚪️Научись замечать его, но не верить ему. Задавай вопросы: «А что, если всё получится?», «Чему меня научит ошибка?

👍588👏4

3 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTC≈3,850 views98 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Естественный усилитель фокуса Чтобы сконцентрироваться, не обязательно пить энергетики. Мозг можно настроить на работу простыми действиями. Как это работает: ⚪️ Устранение визуального шума: убрать всё лишнее со стола, закрыть лишние вкладки, это высвобождает ресурсы мозга. Ему не нужно фильтровать отвлекающие факторы. ⚪️ Естественный дневной свет повышает выработку дофамина и норадреналина, которые отвечают за бо

👍73184🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @bioarcana. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 743,449 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Апгрейд | Бизнес
@Businesses_Upgrade · 111,308
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 August 2026
Финансович | Бизнес блог
@financovich · 139,217
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
Мастер Бизнеса
@master_businessa · 129,699
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Биохакинг | Саморазвитие” (@bioarcana), 42,765 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bioarcana.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.