National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net +880. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55,659–56,818 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 03:15
56,684
+56
15 Sept 2026, 22:20
56,628
+107
14 Sept 2026, 04:37
56,521
+33
12 Sept 2026, 09:37
56,488
+37
10 Sept 2026, 05:20
56,451
+107
7 Sept 2026, 01:36
56,344
+133
4 Sept 2026, 10:42
56,211
+5
2 Sept 2026, 20:58
56,206
+61
1 Sept 2026, 16:16
56,145
+25
31 Aug 2026, 16:38
56,120
+29
30 Aug 2026, 17:08
56,091
+17
29 Aug 2026, 18:04
56,074
+22
28 Aug 2026, 18:44
56,052
+14
27 Aug 2026, 18:06
56,038
+43
26 Aug 2026, 15:23
55,995
+50
25 Aug 2026, 17:22
55,945
+41
24 Aug 2026, 19:07
55,904
+26
23 Aug 2026, 03:58
55,878
+2
21 Aug 2026, 16:36
55,876
+2
20 Aug 2026, 17:18
55,874
first reading
Engagement
1,234 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 112 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.2%
avg views ÷ 56,684 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,600
763 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.699%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
763
of 1,234 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 762 of 763 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
1,234 (5 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
9,612,648
Reactions total
67,207
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 05:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈30,600
Videos
≈3,470
Links
≈763
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 37m
Average length
46s
Measured directly from 127 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
86,485 reactions across 999 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
37,440
43.3%
👍
18,479
21.4%
👎
17,066
19.7%
❤
13,500
15.6%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 999 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86,485 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 18 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mazene. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 18 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
عراقچی:
🔹️اظهاراتی از طرف رییس جمهور آمریکا درباره طرح ایران بیان شد.
🔹️البته رئیس جمهور آمریکا اظهارات ضد و نقیض زیاد دارد؛ ما منتظریم نظر قطعی از طریق واسطهها به ما ابلاغ شود وتصمیمگیری کنیم.
🔹️شروط ما مشخص است و هر حرکتی برای باز شدن تنگه هرمز منوط به محقق شدن این شروط است.
@Mazene ☑️
یک منبع آمریکایی به شبکه i24NEWS:
🔹در حال حاضر، به طور متوسط، حدود 12 میلیون بشکه نفت در روز از تنگه هرمز عبور میکند.
🔹این یکی از دلایلی است که به ترامپ اجازه میدهد تا به توافق قبلی با ایران بگوید "نه".
🔹در همین حال، ما به افزایش حجم صادرات نفت ادامه خواهیم داد و تحریمها علیه ایران را نیز ادامه خواهیم داد.
@Mazene ☑️
سازمان توسعه تجارت ایران در نامهای به گمرک اعلام کرد:
🔹 با توجه به تصمیمات کارگروه ساماندهی مبادلات مرزی، واردات لوازم خانگی از مبدأ کره جنوبی دیگر با هیچ محدودیتی مواجه نیست.
🔹با وجود آنکه تولیدکنندگان لوازم خانگی کرهای پس از برجام بازار ایران را ترک کردند، اکنون مسیر واردات این محصولات دوباره باز شده است.
@Mazene ☑️
آکسیوس به نقل از منابع:
🔹مذاکرهکنندگان آمریکایی به #ایران اطلاع دادند که این کشور هیچ کنترلی بر تنگه هرمز ندارد و حق تعیین شرط برای آن را ندارد.
@Mazene ☑️
سیگنال همیشگی برای خانگی و نقدی کار:
🔹 در ایران هر وقت پول داشتید بخرید و هر وقت لازم داشتید بفروشید. پول مفت هم به کانال های تحلیلی دوزاری ندهید
@Mazene ☑️
🔹ایالات متحده و چین به توافقی دست یافتند تا تعرفههای وارداتی را بر روی کالاهایی به ارزش 30 میلیارد دلار کاهش دهند، این توافق پس از گفتگوهای شی جینپینگ با رئیس جمهور ترامپ حاصل شد.
@Mazene ☑️
🔹ویس های مرحوم حسین مداح را باید با آب طلا نوشت. همیشه مصداق دارد و خواهد داشت
@Mazene ☑️
👍25😁8❤5👎5
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,234 posts we hold for @mazene. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mazene edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
14 September 2026
Most recent edit
19 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Breaking News | اخبار فوری @IR_Breakingnews · 31,902 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 September 2026
💲آکادمی Mr.GOLD 💲 @mrgold995 · 29,194 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
Tala.ir قیمت سکه - قیمت طلا و دلار کانال طلا @talair · 31,917 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 5 September 2026
یادداشت محمد جواد حسینی @Mohammadjavadhosseinii · 23,466 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 September 2026
تحلیل بازار @tahlilbazar · 26,690 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 September 2026
محرمانههای ارزی @Secret_Arzi · 62,331 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
GOLD ONLINE @goldonline2016 · 65,741 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 21 August 2026
توئیتر داغ خبری (اخبار جنگ ایران وآمریکا ) @twiier_news · 51,303 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 August 2026
🌐 مظنه پشت خطی 🌐 @Mazaneeposhtkhati · 35,843 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 2 September 2026
💲شاهین آسمایی💲 @ShaheenAsmaye · 26,220 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 September 2026
اقتصادمدیا ارزی @ecomedia_arzi · 43,457 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
تابان گوهر | قیمت طلا ، قیمت سکه @TalaClinic1 · 70,916 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 20 August 2026
پشت خطی دلار هرات @dolarr2020 · 24,842 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 September 2026
اخبار،طلا،دلار و سکه کارگشا @seke_kargosha · 117,963 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 20 August 2026
اخبار جنگ | قیمت دلار طلا @akhbar_fori_dollar · 22,314 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 21 September 2026
سلطان نوسان @soltan_navasan · 39,346 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
آقای اقتصاد | MrEconomy @Mr_Economy · 113,305 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 18 August 2026
ONSGOLD @OUNSGOLD · 25,886 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 13 September 2026
بانک اول @bank1 · 47,802 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 August 2026
هرات تومن دالر @Herat_Tomen · 162,987 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 12 August 2026
JUST IN TIME @abshdh · 196,465 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Fars News | فارس نیوز @Farse_news1 · 176,572 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 10 August 2026
سیامک قاسمی @siamak_ghassemi · 99,439 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
دلار افشار تهران @DollarAfshar · 25,128 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 43 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ON TIME” (@mazene), 56,684 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mazene.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.