Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 47 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 682–691 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Sept 2026, 09:19
686
+3
10 Sept 2026, 17:57
683
-2
1 Sept 2026, 17:25
685
-2
25 Aug 2026, 14:47
687
-3
18 Aug 2026, 09:24
690
+5
11 Aug 2026, 20:54
685
no change
11 Aug 2026, 18:16
685
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 20s
Average length
40s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
142 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
38
26.8%
custom 5312548900731644977
30
21.1%
😢
15
10.6%
👍
14
9.86%
😁
12
8.45%
💔
10
7.04%
❤🔥
6
4.23%
😭
4
2.82%
🕊
3
2.11%
😡
3
2.11%
💯
2
1.41%
🔥
2
1.41%
😍
2
1.41%
custom 5314324126679197255
1
0.704%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 142 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
هر جامعهای از سوی افراد غیرمتخصص و نیمهکارهای آسیب میبیند که خود را داناتر و برتر از دیگران میپندارند. اینان با دانش ناقص و اعتمادبهنفس کاذب، در حوزههایی که تسلط کامل ندارند وارد میشوند و بهجای اصلاح، فساد و آشفتگی میآفرینند
شیخالاسلام ابنتیمیه رحمه الله این حقیقت را با بیانی دقیق و ماندگار بیان کرده است
إنما يفسد الناس نصف متكلم ونصف فقيه ونصف نحوي ونصف طبيب، هذا يفسد الأديان، وهذا يفسد البلدان، وهذا …
اینجا دمشق است! پایتخت مبارک سرزمین شام
اگر به یاد داشته باشید، پس از سقوط حکومت بشار اسد، شیخ جولانی نخستین سخنرانی خود را بهجای کاخ ریاستجمهوری، در مسجد اموی برگزار کرد. این حرکت، مرا به یاد تاریخ، شکوه و روح خلافت اموی انداخت و امیدوار شدم که شاید بوی احیای خلافت و حاکمیت شریعت بار دیگر از این سرزمین مبارک به مشام برسد
اما هرچه روزها میگذرد، متأسفانه شاهد آن هستیم که فحشا و منکرات روزبهروز آشکارتر و آزادتر م…
خداوند این خاینانِ به الله، رسولش و مومنان را بشرماند!
وقتی اهل غزه سهسال تمام توسط رژیم قاتل یهود سلاخی شدند، این ائتلاف کجا بود؟
آیا این سه قدرت با یک ائتلاف، نمیتوانستند غزه را نجات دهند؟ درحالیکه اقتصاد بزرگ، تسلیحات پیشرفته و اتم بازدارنده در اختیار دارند!
.
چهره واقعیت دارد نمایان میشود
🔹️ بیش از چند دهه، آمریکاییها عربستان را دوشیدند و هر چند وقت یکبار، برای سپر د.فاعی و کمکهای نظامی، دهها میلیارد دلار از حکام عربستان پول گرفتند. بنسلمان هم تصور میکرد با این پولها، عربستانِ توسعهیافته را خواهد ساخت؛ اما جنگهای اخیر و علیالخصوص ج.نگ ایران و آمریکا، یک واقعیت را ثابت کرد: آمریکاییها توان کمک به کشورهایی مثل عربستان را دارا نیستند.
🔹️ حالا پیمانه…
🟢 گردانهای عزالدین قسام، شاخه نظامی حماس برای اولین بار تصاویری از شهید حسن الکحلوت منتشر کرد که در طول نبرد طوفان الاقصی توانست بولدوزر ارتش صهیونیستی را آتش زده و بعد از آن، پرچم حماس را بر بالای آن به اهتزاز دربیاورد.
#طوفـــــان_الاقصی 🟩
#کتائب_القسام_نیوز🔴
🌐 @Al_Qassam_media 👌
غزهی مظلوم، شاهد تشییع جنازههای ۱۱۲ شهید خود بود!
تو ابتلای دومیلیارد امتی، غزه
تو گاهوارهی نسل شهادتی، غزه
نهیی ز نسل دیورند و نسل سایکسپیکو
تو بازماندهی نسل خلافتی، غزه
جهان ندیده به خود قرنها شبیه ترا
تو قبلهگاه بلند شهامتی، غزه
در این زمان که شرفها به قیمت نان است
به جان تو در پی کسب شرافتی، غزه
چهقدر صبر توان کرد عادتا انسان؟
تو ناسخ همه انواع عادتی، غزه
چنان که کتلهی یاران پاک پیغمبر
تو شاهکار…
🔹 آیا حماس خلع سلاح خواهد شد یا خیر؟
تحلیل و جزئیات را از طریق لینک زیر دنبال کنید: 👇👇
https://t.me/+nX-HsARH4L00MmNl
https://t.me/+nX-HsARH4L00MmNl
https://t.me/+nX-HsARH4L00MmNl
عجله کنید وارد شوید 🔼
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Alayzah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أَلاِیضَاح” (@Alayzah), 686 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Alayzah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.