Channel
@NX7878
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,821subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002081110952 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NX7878 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NX7878 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 5,821 | +6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 5,815 | +8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 5,807 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 5,805 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 5,810 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (4 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,930 |
| Reactions total | 55 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
55 reactions across 23 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 52 | 94.5% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 5.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
现在开始收推广人员 只要你的快手或者抖音粉丝和点赞还有关注不是0的都可以参加 在快手抖音发布与未来内核有关的视频 评论区置顶: GeminiESP 播放量低于10000点赞10~90=10元 播放量1万点赞100=15元 播放量1万5点赞150~200=20元 播放量2万点赞200~300=等于30元 以此类推 刚接了点定制的有点小钱而已所以价格会比较低理解一下 参与的去QQ群艾特我 之后要换马内就发视频链接给我核查没问题就打钱
👍2❤1
Signed 阴天不是天
三角洲模拟解密追锁少有的追踪市场项目提卡dd目前只出天卡 @nxnb520
👍3
Signed 暖心
三角洲算法解密测试没有问题现在正在写物资 今天肯定是会出包的 公益1天吧 测试版本的UI先用基础imgui明天发布正式版再更换为和平原来衍生版的UI 对了自瞄你们要不要，内核级陀螺仪和内核级触摸都可以 要回复一不要就回复二
👍2
Signed 阴天不是天
完了早知道不开战斗模式了干了30个被隔离一天
👍1
Signed 阴天不是天
来个人测试三角洲 要测试的进QQ群艾特我
👍1
Signed 阴天不是天
等我再接两个定制顺手全部大更新
👍2
Signed 阴天不是天
三角洲版本明天中午应该能出包🤓 UI继续使用衍生版的 三角洲版本不会长期公益但也会处于半公益状态(小长假期间公益) 毕竟我要吃饭嘛收费价格也会很低
👍1
Signed 阴天不是天
你们要不要玩洗头杯
👍5
Signed 阴天不是天
衍生版下次更新内容 修复算法坐标解密有延迟并且不绘制物资和车辆以及车辆上的人物不绘制的问题(四个字形容就是完美解密) 修复物资不绘制的问题 预计增加巡查预警(观战预警也有) 预计增加安全区预测 优化自瞄算法 优化追踪(5.10的用户追踪就不要玩了因为想适配没人过来测)
👍1
Signed 阴天不是天
目前正在研究三角洲解密差不多要出三角洲了 驱动也在同步研究目前是已经适配三角洲了
👍5
Signed 阴天不是天
4系和5.4是不支持真硬件断点的 这俩玩意连个断点接口都没有不是假断点还能是啥我都懒得说，天天跟我说谁谁谁适配了四系断点追，动点脑子就知道4系的机型根本就没有断点接口
👍9
Signed 阴天不是天
很急很急
Signed 阴天不是天
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @NX7878. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 862,406 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“未来衍生频道” (@NX7878), 5,821 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NX7878.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.