Показываю куда инвестировать деньги с эйрдропов. Живу на пассивный доход с крипты и изучаю WEB3 через игры.
▪️Коплю на пенсию в крипте
▪️В рынке с 2016 года
🤝 Сотрудничество @kostya_cryptorantie
❌ Первый не пишу
Чат канала @web3clickers
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -236. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,837–42,143 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 03:15
41,872
-41
12 Aug 2026, 04:45
41,913
-39
11 Aug 2026, 03:14
41,952
-39
10 Aug 2026, 04:21
41,991
-47
9 Aug 2026, 02:31
42,038
-30
7 Aug 2026, 23:42
42,068
-40
7 Aug 2026, 04:30
42,108
no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:23
42,108
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 3 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
734
Videos
154
Links
602
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
36s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,585 reactions across 18 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
961
37.2%
🔥
417
16.1%
👍
397
15.4%
custom 5343849724736716972
167
6.46%
🗿
114
4.41%
😁
99
3.83%
🤝
86
3.33%
custom 6008315430676992640
79
3.06%
🤯
61
2.36%
⚡
35
1.35%
😭
35
1.35%
😱
28
1.08%
🐳
26
1.01%
🦄
21
0.812%
👏
19
0.735%
🤔
14
0.542%
😡
13
0.503%
🏆
9
0.348%
😢
4
0.155%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,585reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2024 to 5 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❓ Моя стратегия на 1000$ в кликерах (фанатам хомяка не читать)
Ребят, с выходом NOTCOIN на рынок все поняли, что в кликерах есть деньги, и ими точно стоит заниматься.
В ожидании выхода на рынок новых проектов, мы успешно прокачиваем аккаунты, и хотел бы дать свою рекомендацию по всей этой теме.
Чтобы точно достать себе кеш из кликеров, не стоит зацикливаться на одном проекте, нужно качать все, так как мы не знаем,…
🛩 Недавно появился проект – Time Farm о добывании токенов $SECOND
📎 #Time_Farm
Chrono.tech - компания, стоящая за Time Farm, это финтех-гигант 😈
🌐 Компания работает на рынке более 7 лет и может похвастаться собственным токенов $TIME
📣 У компании есть своя крипто-биржа, более подробно прочитать о ней можно тут.
ВАЖНО ⚠️ Новая механика 🔗
🔴 Начиная с 15 августа, если вы не заходили в приложение Time Farm более 7 д…
👉Продолжаем продуктивный день и лутаем фонды и кеш в X Empire
1. Аренда авто в Дубаи
2. Инструменты для добычи золота
3. Проеты блокчейна
Загадка дня: MONOPOLY
Ребус дня: Assets
🔫😄🔫 Надеюсь вы не забили на проект после того как узнали кто CEO?
👀 С самого начала наблюдаю за проектом Lost Dogs от создателей Notcoin 🤑
– Сейчас однозначно понял что
проект берем в портфель ⚠️
📣 В игре мы будем зарабатывать $NOT и $WOOF
Суть игры ❓
🔴 Переходим в бота
🔴 Заходим 1 раз в день
🔴 Развиваем сюжет
🗿 Главная фишка игры в том
что нужно выбирать сюжет, я наблюдал и в канале есть подсказки, по которым мы можем предположить какая карта выиграет 💰
😈 На 42 день подряд, …
🔥 Мое обывательское мнение по текущей ситуации на рынке крипты.
Все циклично. Есть два мощных фактора доказывающие это: циклы Беннера и общая закономерность в крипте (некоторые привязывают ее к халвингу BTC).
В первом случае (скрин 1) показан график рыночных циклов с 1872 по 2059 год, прогнозирующий развитие бизнеса и изменение цен на сырьевые товары. Если сравните предыдущие года с графиком, то совпадения практиче…
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👨💻 GM, друзья. Мы вернули реакции + сторисы - вы мощь! АЖ 2ЛВЛ
Поэтому теперь:
🐇 - заряжаемся на продуктивную неделю
😈 - колдуем на рост крипто-рынка!
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @cryptorantie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Ваше отношение к Youtube после полного замедления (блокировки):
Продолжу смотреть с vpn61%
Забью, мне хватает Telegram27%
Пойду на другие видео-платформы21%
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2024 to 5 August 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 163,565 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@cryptorantie named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@muskempire_bot named in 6 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@royal_clickbot named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CRYPTO RANTIE” (@cryptorantie), 41,872 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptorantie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
