Channel
@greenmanalishichannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
200subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002449033047 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @greenmanalishichannel |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 10 January 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/greenmanalishichannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 200 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 201 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 204 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:11 | 205 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 206 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 206 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 10 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
96 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 68 | 70.8% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 7.29% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 5.21% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 January 2025 to 17 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#gmc_подборка 1 Подборки своих последних активностей я делаю уже довольно давно, теперь буду публиковать их под хештегом #gmc_подборка и это будет первый пост. Тут будут как актуальные активности/коллы, так и ретроспективно то что я уже сделал. Расчёты того сколько я потратил на фарм пулов в earn и сколько капнуло монет. Новые пулы куда буду класть деньги раз, два. Видел ещё разные на других биржах, но пока интере…
❤7👍4
Green Manalishi Channel pinned a photo
Хочу как все крутые криптаны попробовать другой формат, формат щитпоста. Но щитпостом я всё-таки это не назову т.к. откровенно срать туда я не буду, назову лайв каналом. В нём будет гораздо больше постов, они будут более живыми, некрасивыми и необработанными. Возможно будет побольше полезной инфы в силу того что я не успеваю обо всём написать красивенькие посты. Возможно будет спам постами. Посмотрим куда меня это за…
❤7
Ну а Lost Dogs вышли с fdv около 5 миллионов $, что само по себе пиздец как мало, а мои 140к нафармленных $WOOF превращает в 40$ 😂 Сливать так не хочу, может и подрастёт. Но в целом ладно, основная ставка в пуле всё равно была на $PX
😁5
Ещё и в байбите будет новый пул и тоже 20 числа, но выгоднее закинуть будет скорее всего как обычно в джампстарт
👍3
Новый джампстарт в окексе https://www.okx.com/jumpstart/project/10136 Последние джампстарты приносили неплохие бабки, будем залетать в этот. Только тогда были варианты захода через эфир или биток или и то и то, а теперь через OKB и биток. Ну лимит 0.3 бтц если что, пойдёт
👍6
Микроитоги по фарму @earn 10 января вечером зашёл через ton 11 января днём перезашёл через not Прямо сейчас продал все ноты на споте и закрыл хедж шорт на фьючах Заплатил комиссий за открытие-закрытие спота: 56 usdt + 8900 $NOT = ~112$ Заплатил комиссий за открытие-закрытие шорта: 57$ Потратил на покупку платиновых статусов в ноткоине на 2 аккаунта: 242$ Заработано с фандинга: 23$ Итого затраты: 388$ Фармились сна…
👍9
В Treehouse новый бадж за бридж mainnet->arb, быстренько накидал шаблон на зенке и поставил делаться на те же акки что делали первый бадж. Слотов ещё полно, можно делать. Сейл солеера походу полный скип, если накидают условно 400 лямов как в сейл Fuel на битгете то от аллоки в 2000$ останется 50$. Итого для получения аллоки в 1000$ (которая наверное даст 2-3 икса) надо будет холдануть 40000. И это не битгет у которо…
👍6
https://jupuary.jup.ag/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thvJzpH4J-c
🔥3
Залетаю. Как и писал, позу не закрывал, так что комиссии второй раз не плачу. А фандинг пока даже в плюс идёт.
👍4
🪙 Earn x Lost Dogs | The way is open $WOOF is the main token of the Lost Dogs ecosystem, with over 80% of its supply owned by players. It will be central to future projects within the franchise. TMA | Twitter | Telegram · Hold NOT: 85,050,000 · Hold TON: 36,450,000 · Hold BUILD: 31,590,000 · Hold Lost Dogs NFT: 36,450,000 · Notcoin Levels: 40,230,000 · Notcoin Stakers: 40,230,000 Total Rewards: 243,000,000 $WOOF…
👍4
Уже вообще не особо хочется заходить 🤢
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @greenmanalishichannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Green Manalishi Channel” (@greenmanalishichannel), 200 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/greenmanalishichannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.