Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Arbitration Planet🌐

@arbitrationplanet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

447subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002232134554
TypeChannel
Username@arbitrationplanet
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/arbitrationplanet

Growth

446447446.59 Aug 2026, 18:17 — 446 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 18:30 — 446 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 12:43 — 447 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 18:1710 Aug 2026, 12:43
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 446–447 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 12:43447+1
9 Aug 2026, 18:30446no change
9 Aug 2026, 18:17446first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.9%
avg views ÷ 447 subscribers
Avg views / post
134
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 June 20263 August 2026)
Views total1,203
Reactions total27
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

49 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1836.7%
1428.6%
816.3%
🔥36.12%
👌24.08%
👏24.08%
🤝24.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC57 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @disputeresolutionclub

⚡️Минюст США в заключении amicus curiae призвал Апелляционный суд США по округу Колумбия самостоятельно установить наличие действительного арбитражного соглашения, не руководствуясь решением Верховного суда Швейцарии Очень любопытный документ, на самом деле. 20 июля 2026 года Министерство юстиции США представило заключение amicus curiae в Апелляционный суд США по округу Колумбия по делу Yukos Capital v. Russia о пр

🔥2

Signed Наталья Кузнецова

31 Jul 2026, 06:55 UTC104 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ProArbitrationRu

𝗗𝗼 𝘀𝗮𝗻𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗯𝗶𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮? 𝗟𝗶𝗸𝗲𝗹𝘆 '𝘆𝗲𝘀,' 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝗼 𝗳𝗮𝗿. In Case No. A56-113018/2025, a Russian entity, disregarding an LMAA arbitration clause, brought a legal action against two Russian entities. By its ruling dated 28 May 2026, the court of first instance referred the parties to the agreed forum. The court held that (1) the claimant was not listed on a

2👍1

Signed Наталья Кузнецова

30 Jul 2026, 06:05 UTC103 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @mansorsPhoto

Развитие арбитража, границы автономии воли сторон и компетенция арбитров. Почти весь XX век развитием международного коммерческого арбитража занимались Европа и США, что привело к глубокому уровню компетенции местных юристов и серьезной востребованности арбитражных институтов в этих странах. По словам партнера Mansors Владимира Хвалея, споры на сумму свыше $10 млн (так называемый luxury arbitration) часто рассматри

Signed Наталья Кузнецова

27 Jul 2026, 08:38 UTC193 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, хочу поделиться действительно впечатляющим проектом — сайтом http://2026.проарбитражность.рф созданным моим коллегой Андреем Костицыным . Это уникальный ресурс, посвящённый ежегодному круглому столу «Россия как место разрешения споров: «импортозамещение» в арбитраже», который проводится в Президентской академии во исполнение поручений Президента РФ. На площадке собраны ключевые темы 2025-2026 г. — от мер по

👍53👏2

Signed Наталья Кузнецова

24 Jul 2026, 06:29 UTC166 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @lawsanctions

21-й пакет. Часть 3. Процессуальные изменения в ‘No claims clause’ Заменена норма статьи 11а(1) Регламента 269 в части пространственной сферы действия и по кругу лиц. Если раньше европейский субъект делового оборота мог потребовать в ⚖️ судах стран-членов 🇪🇺 взыскать с оппонента компенсацию за решения, полученные в 🇷🇺 России по т.н. «закону Лугового», и когда в основании дела – ограничительные меры ЕС, при лишении

2👌2👍1

Signed Наталья Кузнецова

17 Jul 2026, 08:04 UTC166 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @disputeresolutionclub

🛢 Когда триггерит оговорка о форс-мажоре: экс-президент Международного арбитражного суда ICC о том, что придется доказывать стороне, желающей получить освобождение от ответственности за неисполнение обязательств В океане безумия, затопившего страны Персидского залива и не только, Ормуз стал одним из самых опасных водоворотов. Расходящиеся от него круги определяют политическую, экономическую, логистическую и, естеств

1👍1

Signed Наталья Кузнецова

16 Jul 2026, 09:45 UTC146 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

👆⚡Интересное дело для практикующих и будущих арбитров👆

👍1🤝1

Signed Наталья Кузнецова

16 Jul 2026, 08:28 UTC143 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @UsoskinArbPhoto

Когда арбитражи идут параллельно, арбитры могут скопировать некоторые части одного решения в другое Высокий суд Сингапура отказал в отмене решения арбитража по спору между фрахтователем и субфрахтователем, признав, что скопировав части арбитражного решения из решения по спору между владельцем и фрахтователем арбитры не создали разумные сомнения в своей беспристрастности. Вспомогательное судно было передано владельц

1👍1🤝1

Signed Наталья Кузнецова

8 Jul 2026, 14:59 UTC172 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @disputeresolutionclub

⚡️🔥 AIFC Court отменил ранее вынесенное решение о признании и приведении в исполнение арбитражного решения Суда ICC в пользу «Нафтогаза Украины» 7 июля 2026 года Суд первой инстанции Международного финансового центра «Астана» (Court of First Instance, Astana International Financial Centre, Суд МФЦА) отменил ранее вынесенное решение о признании и приведении в исполнение арбитражного решения Международного арбитражног

Signed Наталья Кузнецова

8 Jul 2026, 07:07 UTC152 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @denuolawPhoto

Друзья, рады поделиться с вами второй частью исследования российского рынка сделок с технологическими активами по итогам 2025 года, проведенного совместно Анастасией Нерчинской, Denuo, АЛРУД, Verba Legal и Advance Capital. Исследование охватывает особенности юридического структурирования сделок Tech M&A, юридическую проверку и управление рисками в таких сделках, а также специфику сделок M&A с ИИ-компаниями. Мы были

2👍2🔥1

Signed Наталья Кузнецова

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @arbitrationplanet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 976,719 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Arbitration Planet🌐” (@arbitrationplanet), 447 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arbitrationplanet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.