О двигательном развитии малыша и об укреплении связи со своим ребёнком!
Написать мне @lapshina_oksana
Номер заявления в РКН #5096386670
max-n5vz
ВК: https://vk.com/lapshina_babymassage
Инст: https://www.instagram.com/lapshina_babymassage
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 41 days, net -718. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,419–23,353 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 04:01
22,527
-23
15 Sept 2026, 22:18
22,550
-18
14 Sept 2026, 05:58
22,568
-26
12 Sept 2026, 12:36
22,594
-35
10 Sept 2026, 13:01
22,629
-44
7 Sept 2026, 08:39
22,673
-58
4 Sept 2026, 10:39
22,731
-41
2 Sept 2026, 21:39
22,772
-60
1 Sept 2026, 20:44
22,832
-18
31 Aug 2026, 20:48
22,850
-26
30 Aug 2026, 19:19
22,876
-16
29 Aug 2026, 18:29
22,892
-21
28 Aug 2026, 17:07
22,913
-11
27 Aug 2026, 18:44
22,924
-9
26 Aug 2026, 16:04
22,933
+64
25 Aug 2026, 14:39
22,869
-16
24 Aug 2026, 11:24
22,885
-29
22 Aug 2026, 19:47
22,914
+12
21 Aug 2026, 13:17
22,902
-21
20 Aug 2026, 14:36
22,923
first reading
Engagement
104 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.02%
avg views ÷ 22,527 subscribers
Avg views / post
680
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 104 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
104 (29 July 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
19,725
Reactions total
889
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 02:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,170
Videos
≈2,150
Links
≈1,090
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
9m 09s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,113 reactions across 104 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,935
71.4%
👍
437
10.6%
🔥
373
9.07%
🥰
208
5.06%
🙏
79
1.92%
😢
28
0.681%
👏
15
0.365%
👌
12
0.292%
💯
12
0.292%
🤔
5
0.122%
💔
4
0.097%
👎
3
0.073%
✍
1
0.024%
❤🔥
1
0.024%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 104 of the 104 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,113 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 104 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 104 we hold a reading for · 1.0%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lapshina_babymassage. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 104 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
«Но он же сам хочет! Не дашь — требует!»
Не так давно я выложила в Instagram пост про «попрыгушки», когда взрослый держит малыша на своих коленях, а тот отталкивается ножками и прыгает и хохочет.
И комментарии запестрили:
«Докажите, что это вредно».
«Всю жизнь дети так прыгали, и ничего».
«А вот я с Алёшкой так с рождения прыгала, здоровым вырос».
«Но ребёнку же нравится! Он хохочет и сам просит ещё».
А перед пост…
Здравствуйте. Нам почти 5 месяцев. Как стимулировать малыша у ползанию? Дочка уверенно переворачивается на живот, играет с игрушками, крутится на месте вокруг себя. Но для перемещения требует взять ее на ручки, посадить с поддержкой, поставить на ножки, держа за грудь, или походить по дому с ней на руках. Понимаю, что ей всё это еще рано, но она истерикой требует этого... Боюсь навредить
Елена, здравствуйте! Вопрос Оксане задала я. Малыш тоже родился на 32 неделе, провел в детской реанимации 38 дней. О курсе я узнала много позже, приобрела 0-3, когда малышу было уже два месяца. 10 октября ему исполнится 5 месяцев. Спешу ли я на 3-6? Нет. Возможно, это неправильно, но когда ребенок только что учился дышать и сосать, ел через зонд, мне казалось, жестоким заставлять его держать голову в погоне за нормам…
Когда мы наконец оказались вместе, я начала постоянно что-то делать с ребёнком. Курс 0-3 уже был куплен. Где -то массировала щечки, где-то массировала ушки ручки, ножки, живота спинку. Трогала ребёнка постоянно, шевелила. Мне врачи так и сказали это важнейшее золоте время до рождения малыша. Не упусти его. Я старалась не упускать. На курс 0-3 мы пришли на 35 неделе, то есть фактически за 5 недель до даты ПДР.
Конечно…
Оксана, здравствуйте! Очень хочу поделиться с вами первыми шажочки
И вспомнить какими мы были
Мы родились на 31неделе с весом 1012 гр. Состояние было крайне тяжелое, прогнозов никаких не давали. Причем когда я родила, услышала от одного из врачей слова – слабенький – не выживет. Тогда у меня все внутри сжалось а я дала обещание о себе – будет сильным, выживет. Я для этого сделаю и всё
Да, программа курса «Новорождённый. 0–3» подходит и для недоношенных малышей. Задачи двигательного развития перед ними стоят те же самые, просто, как я писала в посте, на освоение того или иного навыка иногда требуется чуть больше времени.
Поэтому ориентируемся не столько на календарный возраст, сколько на скорректированный возраст и текущие возможности малыша.
✨ Для недоношенных малышей в моей школе действуют таки…
Оксана, здравствуйте
Огромное спасибо за пост! Все встало на свои места
Подскажите пожалуйста подходит ли курс 0-3 для недоношенного малыша или нужна другая какая-то программа для развития ? Малыш родился на сроке 32 недели.
Ему сейчас 35 недель
Пока в больнице находимся
Как развивается недоношенный малыш и когда стоит переживать?
У мам недоношенных малышей почти всегда возникает вопрос: на какой возраст вообще ориентироваться? Когда ждать переворота, четверенек, ползания, ходьбы? И как понять: малышу просто нужно больше времени или он уже нуждается в помощи?
🟨Самый простой ориентир — считать возраст от ПДР.
Если ребёнок родился на два месяца раньше, то в его 6 календарных месяцев…
Оксана, не могли бы Вы рассказать о двигательном развитии недоношенных малышей? В какие сроки ожидать каждый навык или это индивидуально и четких правил нет? Когда стоит переживать и паниковать, а когда все идет по плану, пусть и позже доношенных сверстников? Очень мало информации о развитии недоношенных и это только усиливает тревогу "а вдруг что-то не так?"
ВЧЕРА В МОЕЙ ШКОЛЕ СЛУЧИЛАСЬ ОЧЕНЬ ТЁПЛАЯ ИСТОРИЯ
Вчера мне написала одна из мам, которая занималась в моей школе. Когда-то она пришла на «Ползай-ку» и сразу приобрела комбо с «Шагай-кой». Но малыш развивался очень быстро, довольно рано пошёл самостоятельно, и второй курс им в итоге просто не понадобился.
И мама предложила: давайте либо разыграем оставшийся курс среди подписчиков, либо подарим его кому-нибудь, кому…
Здравствуйте, покупала два курса подряд шагайка и ползайка. И как-то всё откладывала начало шагайки, сейчас у меня сын уже давно бегает и забирается везде где можно, возвращать деньги не хочу, но есть вопрос. Оплаченный курс на балансе висит, а можно ли его подарить кому-нибудь? Допустим, чтобы вы разыграли мой неиспользованный курс.
ДВЕ НЕДЕЛИ НАБЛЮДАЕМ. А ДАЛЬШЕ?
Сегодня отвечала на вопросы в Instagram, и снова очень много вопросов про перевороты:
«Малыш научился переворачиваться со спины на живот, но делает это только через один бок. Уже месяц. Когда нужно что-то предпринимать?»
И каждый раз — и в Telegram, и в Instagram — я говорю одно и то же:
✅ориентируйтесь примерно на две недели.
Хотя, если честно, и две недели — срок для очень терпе…
❤21🔥5🥰3
Showing the 12 most recent of 104 posts we hold for @lapshina_babymassage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@lapshina_babymassage edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Polina for baby @polinaforbaby · 48,799 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
Новокриницкие/развитие 0-12 мес @massagist_novokrinitskii · 88,029 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 August 2026
DOC.POPOVKIN’ы @docpopovkina · 88,288 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
Педиатр из роддома Ева Азарова @anyclass_supermama · 53,090 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
Школа мам @mom_school · 26,899 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Реабилитолог Оксана Лапшина о двигательном развитии малышей” (@lapshina_babymassage), 22,527 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lapshina_babymassage.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.