Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Марианна Лынская

Channel

Марианна Лынская

@mlynskaya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

26,805subscribers

-74 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001612539623
TypeChannel
Username@mlynskaya
DescriptionЛогопед в 3 поколении ✸ Клинический психолог ✸ Аналитический психолог ✸ Речевой терапевт для детей с РАС 📚 Обучение специалистов и родителей 📍Сайт: https://lynskaya.com 📍Институт АЛ: https://lynskayainstitut.ru #VKDBW 6851394949
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mlynskaya

Growth

26,80526,88026,842.57 August 2026 — 26,879 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,880 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,872 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,861 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,852 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,842 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,844 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,822 subscribers15 August 2026 — 26,805 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -74. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,794–26,891 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 06:1226,805-17
14 Aug 2026, 00:1326,822-22
12 Aug 2026, 19:3326,844+2
11 Aug 2026, 19:5526,842-10
10 Aug 2026, 17:4226,852-9
9 Aug 2026, 19:3326,861-11
8 Aug 2026, 21:0726,872-8
7 Aug 2026, 18:0226,880+1
7 Aug 2026, 03:1826,879first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.77%
avg views ÷ 26,805 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,550
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held30 (24 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total46,414
Reactions total886
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 05:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,940
Videos
1,440
Links
1,860

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 19s
Average length
1m 20s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

886 reactions across 30 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
40045.1%
🔥26529.9%
👍13114.8%
🤩303.39%
🤔171.92%
🎉141.58%
👏80.903%
😁70.79%
🤯50.564%
😱40.451%
😢30.339%
👎10.113%
🥰10.113%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 886reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 30 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mlynskaya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC627 views7 reactionsread 16 August 2026

2/2 ✨ Появление любого архетипа, и этого, в том числе архетипа внутреннего ребенка, в сознании и предсознании (например, снах) обычно абсолютно непроизвольно. Но работа по «оптимизации» собственной психики (работа с собой, медитации, психотерапия и пр.) направлена в том числе на то, чтобы человек мог произвольно пользоваться энергией данного архетипа для исцеления своих эмоций, направления своих мыслей и принятия р

4👍2🥰1

15 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC543 views11 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🧸 «Внутренний ребенок» внутри каждого из вас Внутренний ребенок — это та часть личности, которая всегда хочет развиваться и становиться целостной, это наш мостик к Самости. Понятие «внутренний ребёнок» впервые ввёл в оборот родоначальник аналитической психологии Карл Юнг. Это понятие, которое сейчас стало практически попсовым, и в масс-маркете обозначает просто «детскую часть» личности, представленную нашими воспом

8👍3

14 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC957 views10 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

✨Вот и подошёл к концу вебинар «Структура психики и основные понятия аналитической психологии». В моменте нас было больше 230 человек — и, что особенно ценно, несмотря на то, что все мы такие разные, эфир получился по-настоящему тёплым и безопасным пространством. Я благодарна, что вы решились быть открытыми — делились, спрашивали, откликались на слова друг друга. 🧠 Мы начали с истоков — с того, как вообще зародилас

8👍2

14 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC881 views7 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

⏰ Коллеги, до начала эфира «Структура психики и основные понятия аналитической психологии» осталось 15 минут! 🔗 Подключайтесь по ссылке: https://lynskaya.com/enter_web14?utm_source=tg Важно! Как подключиться, чтобы всё работало, — делимся памяткой 👆 Заходите заранее, чтобы устроиться поудобнее и ничего не пропустить, — стартуем ровно в 18:00. 💬 Если у вас возникнут сложности с подключением, пожалуйста, обратитесь

7

14 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC854 views15 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Чем похожа психика ребенка с аутизмом и специалиста, работающего с ним? (Часть 3) #Лынская_статья 🟢 X-времени — это конкретно сколько? А потому и X, что для одного ребенка — это неделя, а для другого — это один час. Потому что ответственность за травму всегда не только на матери, но и на психике самого ребенка (гены-то не исключаем из памяти, а они у всех разные). 🟢 У такого-то ребенка аутизм, потому что его мать

👍93🔥3

14 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC594 views21 reactionsread 16 August 2026

2/2 🌪 Тревога дезинтеграции — это самая глубокая тревога, которую может испытывать человек, потому что на этом этапе еще нет Эго, нет личности, нет слов внутри головы, чтобы объяснить себе, что происходит. Именно она возникла на дологическом, досимволическом уровне, когда не могло найтись для нее объяснений, кроме как «извне». Вот что пишет Винникотт об этом. 🟢 Для младенца ощущение присутствия матери длится x мин

15👍6

14 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC607 views9 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Чем похожа психика ребенка с аутизмом и специалиста, работающего с ним? (Часть 2) 1/2 #Лынская_статья Можно ли избавиться от навязчивостей и ригидности? КПТ-техниками можно, но ненадолго: они просто перейдут в новую форму. 🪢 Я же всегда выступаю за работу с «узловым моментом» (работа с узловым моментом — центральный принцип предлагаемого мной метода — системной аналитической логотерапии). 🔖 А в чем узловой моме

7🔥2

14 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC658 views35 reactionsread 16 August 2026

2/2 Среди самых распространенных у специалистов помогающих профессий: 1️⃣ обгрызание ногтей или кожи, ковыряние родинок и выдавливание прыщей, в общем, телесно-деструктивные навязчивости; 2️⃣ навязчивые сомнения, связанные с достаточностью полученного образования и опыта, чтобы начать что-либо/повысить ценник; 3️⃣ скупка очередных пособий, когда их уже столько, что можно начинать продавать; 4️⃣ симметричное расп

31😁4

14 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC744 views24 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Чем похожа психика ребенка с аутизмом и специалиста, работающего с ним? (Часть 1) #Лынская_статья 1/2 Нет, не каждого специалиста, конечно. Того, кто ставит звуки ребенку с аутизмом, и самого ребенка мало что объединяет, хотя и такое может быть. Но вот те специалисты, кто занимаются с ним игровой терапией, кто проникает в мир его образов на психотерапии, те, кто работает с его телом, и те логопеды, кто решаются н

17🔥7

14 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC799 views29 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Давно не было лонгридов, да? Надеюсь, что часть аудитории все же соскучилась по длинным и серьезным статьям? 😊

17👍8😁3🤩1

14 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC≈1,110 views18 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Не все логопеды осознают, зачем им нужны знания в области психологии. Давайте я расскажу о том, чем могут быть психологические знания полезны в деятельности логопеда: 1️⃣ Понимание, из каких структур состоит психика, позволяет определять структуру нарушения, а также спланировать коррекционную работу, исходя из понимания того, что первично, а что вторично. Соответственно, если вы понимаете, что речь вторична по отно

👍144

13 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC≈1,350 views25 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Я подготовила для вас психологический тест: возможно, пришло время познакомиться не только со мной, но и с собой? Про что этот тест? Про то, насколько активна в вашей жизни сейчас стратегия выживания. ❓ Что вообще такое это «выживание»? Выживание — это выработанный личностью механизм психологической защиты в форме полного или частичного исключения эмоционального реагирования, творческой реализации, отказа от выбо

🔥1510

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @mlynskaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 10,501 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Марианна Лынская” (@mlynskaya), 26,805 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mlynskaya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.