Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Копилка для занятий|Асцентиа

Channel

Копилка для занятий|Асцентиа

@ascentiachannel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,782subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001793169714
TypeChannel
Username@ascentiachannel
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ascentiachannel

Growth

3,7823,7903,7867 August 2026 — 3,789 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,789 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,790 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,785 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,782 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,781–3,791 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 17:563,782-3
13 Aug 2026, 09:173,785-5
8 Aug 2026, 03:573,790+1
7 Aug 2026, 08:313,789no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:213,789first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.7%
avg views ÷ 3,782 subscribers
Avg views / post
557
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026
Posts held18 (1 July 202620 July 2026)
Views total557
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

57 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4171.9%
👍1322.8%
🔥23.51%
👏11.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 10:15 UTC557 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А это родители после диагностики 😁 Друзья, вижу, что многие ждут материалы для родителей. Они уже активно пишутся, просто выкладывать их начну со следующей недели. Хочется сделать это не хаотично, а так, чтобы каждая публикация была логичным продолжением предыдущей. А пока у меня снова расширилась рамка стажировки, и появились новые места для семей. Мы поняли, что одной диагностики часто недостаточно. Да, важно по

Signed Валерия Сафина Нейропсихолог

18 Jul 2026, 19:01 UTC249 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @psychosafinaPhoto

Продолжаем чтения сегодня в 22:30

2

Signed Валерия Сафина Нейропсихолог

15 Jul 2026, 05:14 UTC644 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, помните, я обещала рассказать про нейропсихологическую диагностику? 😊 Но сначала у меня к вам просьба. Пожалуйста, прочитайте этот пост не как специалисты, а как родители. Если где-то вам покажется, что написано слишком сложно или непонятно, обязательно напишите об этом в комментариях. Давайте попробуем вместе найти те самые слова, которые действительно будут понятны семьям. Сейчас середина июля. И, наве

2👍1

Signed Валерия Сафина Нейропсихолог

14 Jul 2026, 20:08 UTC513 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Четыре дня я почти ничего не писала. Не потому, что нечего было сказать. А потому, что очень хотелось найти правильные слова. Я все думала, как объяснить родителям, что такое нейропсихологическая диагностика. Как рассказать о ней так, чтобы не уйти в сложные термины, но и не скатиться в обещания из серии «мы сейчас за два часа решим все ваши проблемы». В итоге... пока я думала, почти все места уже заняли. 😄 На ди

👍1

Signed Валерия Сафина Нейропсихолог

14 Jul 2026, 19:52 UTC221 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍1

Signed Валерия Сафина Нейропсихолог

14 Jul 2026, 19:51 UTC224 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @psychosafinaFile

📚 Джон Буолби «Создание и разрушение эмоциональных связей». Лекция 1 (часть 1) Начинаем читать одну из самых важных книг по теории привязанности. В этой части обсудили: • почему разлука с матерью может влиять на человека всю жизнь; • что такое амбивалентность и почему злиться на любимых - это нормально; • почему ребенок может одновременно любить родителей и ненавидеть их; • почему наказание и стыд не учат ребенк

4

Signed Валерия Сафина Нейропсихолог

14 Jul 2026, 18:15 UTC216 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @psychosafinaPhoto

А не возобновить ли нам чтения? Сегодня в 21 30 пробуем live тут в телеграмме. Присоединяйтесь читать и обсуждать психоаналитическую литературу

Signed Валерия Сафина Нейропсихолог

10 Jul 2026, 19:32 UTC359 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

Signed Валерия Сафина Нейропсихолог

10 Jul 2026, 18:02 UTC375 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

После последнего поста многие поставили ❤️, но в личные сообщения почти никто не написал. И, если честно, я совсем не удивилась. Потому что очень часто родители даже не подозревают, что многие сложности, с которыми они сталкиваются каждый день, могут быть поводом не для очередной ссоры дома, а для нейропсихологической диагностики. Поэтому ближайшие несколько дней хочу разбирать самые частые ситуации, с которыми се

5

Signed Валерия Сафина Нейропсихолог

9 Jul 2026, 19:04 UTC328 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❤️ Кажется, июль действительно становится месяцем помощи семьям. Если среди ваших знакомых есть родители, которые давно хотели пройти нейропсихологическую диагностику, но постоянно откладывали ее, пожалуйста, перешлите им этот пост. Сейчас у нас есть сразу две возможности. 🔹 Нейропсихологическая диагностика за 2000 рублей. Диагностику проводят специалисты, которые проходят у меня наставничество. Каждый случай мы

8👍4👏1

Signed Валерия Сафина Нейропсихолог

8 Jul 2026, 19:32 UTC418 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ПОВ: А какие ошибки тут видите вы? ❤️ Кажется, пришло время рассказать подробности. В прошлом посте я писала, что хочу показать вам, как на самом деле выглядит сопровождение специалиста. Не красивое готовое заключение, а весь путь: от первой анкеты родителей до клинического мышления, которое рождается во время разбора случая. И чем больше я об этом думала, тем больше понимала, что это может быть полезно не только сп

👍3

Signed Валерия Сафина Нейропсихолог

8 Jul 2026, 07:22 UTC273 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кажется, я поняла, почему так много специалистов написали мне после прошлого поста. Дело ведь совсем не в том, что интересно посмотреть чужую диагностику. Настоящий страх начинается после нее. Когда ребенок ушел. Все пробы проведены. Перед тобой лежат записи. И ты сидишь с одной мыслью: "А что теперь?" Как понять, какие ошибки действительно важны? Как не перепутать регуляторные трудности с трудностями перера

4👍1

Signed Валерия Сафина Нейропсихолог

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ascentiachannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 82,514 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DOC.POPOVKIN’ы
@docpopovkina · 86,087
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Копилка для занятий|Асцентиа” (@ascentiachannel), 3,782 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ascentiachannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.