Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Эхо Руси

Channel

Эхо Руси

@ekho_rusi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

328subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001809257140
TypeChannel
Username@ekho_rusi
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ekho_rusi

Growth

327328327.56 August 2026 — 328 subscribers6 August 2026 — 328 subscribers7 August 2026 — 327 subscribers15 August 2026 — 328 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 327–328 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:08328+1
7 Aug 2026, 11:21327-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:47328no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:45328first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 10 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.7%
avg views ÷ 328 subscribers
Avg views / post
87.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held15 (10 April 202629 July 2026)
Views total175
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

113 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5346.9%
3127.4%
🔥2421.2%
👏32.65%
👎10.885%
😁10.885%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 11:09 UTC64 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ruscorporaPhoto

Древнерусский корпус пополнен 129 тематическими комплексами экстратекстов на восточнославянских рукописях XII–XIV вв. — добавлено больше 230 записей общим объемом 5 тысяч слов. Учтены современные лингвистические публикации. Тематическая метаразметка позволяет выбрать отдельный подкорпус молитв, бытовых заметок или литературных миниатюр. В корпусе появилось 200 «новых» древнерусских лексем, в том числе предки таких пр

4

25 Jul 2026, 05:57 UTC111 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @lacewars

#lacewars_Статья #lacewars_Средневековье Средневековые трубадуры не были бледными юношами с лютнями, томящимися под балконами прекрасных дам. Они были наёмными политтехнологами и юристами, которые обслуживали королей и баронов и формировали общественное мнение. Не за бесплатно, конечно. Проще говоря, они были средневековыми ЛОМами или «инфлюенсерами». Эта светская тусовка чувствовала себя хозяевами жизни, пока не пе

🔥1

7 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC152 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @archi_ruPhoto

В Ленинградской области под обшивкой сельского магазина обнаружена церковь XVII века. Радиоуглеродный анализ показал, что нижние венцы датируются 1432–1630 годами. Подробности здесь. #наследие #дерево #деревянноеЗодчество #Ленобласть

🔥8👍2😁1

23 Jun 2026, 14:48 UTC222 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @lang_witchVideo

А викинги всё те же 😂 Мы все умрём, так что дружно метим в Вальгаллу, а остальное неважно, потому что потом всё равно Рагнарёк.

👍8

25 May 2026, 20:19 UTC251 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @borodatiy_merjaninVideo

Ботник: сквозь огонь и воду. Почти у каждого мерянина живущего у водоёма была собственная лодка. Эти лодки изготавливались по определенной технологии, она передавалась из поколения в поколения и дошла до наших дней. Умельцы, сохранившие знания наших предков, до сих пор изготавливают и продают лодки долблёнки. О древнем промысле наших предков рассказывают мастера - Михаил Сергеевич Напылов и Владимир Сергеевич Воро

9👍2👎1

14 May 2026, 17:03 UTC261 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @novostnitsaPhoto

Школьник из Норвегии нашел однолезвийный меч викингов возрастом 1,3 тысячи лет. Событие, которое случается один раз на миллион, произошло во время школьной экскурсии: Юный Хенрик Рефснес Мортведт, <…> исследуя вспаханное поле в Брандбу со своим классом, заметил нечто необычное, торчащее из земли. Его зоркий глаз обнаружил редкий однолезвийный меч. Учителя и ученики немедленно связались с археологами, которые подтве

🔥8

10 May 2026, 10:27 UTC217 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @fvuchannalVideo

Знаменное пение Новгородская певческая традиция занимает одно из ключевых мест в истории древнерусского богослужебного пения. Новгород в XI–XV веках был не только крупным политическим и экономическим центром, но и важнейшим очагом духовной культуры, книжности и церковного искусства. Именно здесь складывались условия для длительного сохранения и развития древних форм богослужебного распева, в том числе знаменного пен

👍6

9 May 2026, 06:25 UTC196 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @historygothyPhoto

И еще немного северного золота. Хотя не так уж и немного – шесть браслетов датских викингов, обнаруженных на северо-востоке Ютландии, потянули почти на 800 граммов. Это, как сообщается, третий по тяжести золотой клад, найденный в Дании. Первые два браслета обнаружил у дороги местный житель и, будучи сознательным гражданином, сообщил археологам. С помощью металлоискателей они изучили место и в 15 метрах нашли еще нес

🔥7

2 May 2026, 05:44 UTC250 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Славяне и скандинавы Нередко можно встретить мнение о какой-то особой отсталости древних славян в сравнении с соседями. Особенно достаётся восточным славянам, поскольку в формировании нашей государственности приняли участие варяги прибывшие из-за моря. Откровенные русофобы вообще сравнивают взаимодействие славян и варягов в 9-10 веках с отношениями индейцев и европейцев в Северной Америке. Разумеется подобное мнение

👍81

28 Apr 2026, 12:28 UTC200 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @skaldneinteresnyPhoto

🏰РАННЕГОРОДСКИЕ ЦЕНТРЫ РУСИ И СКАНДИНАВИИ Ну что, в отсутствие я говорил «I’ll be back» подобно Карлсону и, как обычно, после прочтения пожеланий по темам в комментариях, в голову пришло совсем другое, уж простите. В общем, сегодня о городах. Думаю, в целом, очевидно, что города в раннем средневековье не возникали совсем уж стихийно, а раз в этом процессе была какая-никакая система со своими закономерностями, то, с

👍62

24 Apr 2026, 20:28 UTC208 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @merjanynVideo

Вече на каждой улице. Археолог Павел Николаевич Травкин про наших мерянских предков и вечевую демократию. Этот фрагмент из документального фильма "Среднерусская Атлантида", снятого нашим другом Андреем Шляховым (ГТРК "Культура". 2014), для меня лично — политическое завещание Павыл Коча (21.10.1956 — 23.04.2026). Йоло теда!

10

22 Apr 2026, 16:14 UTC196 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @marebufo

Случилось тут мне на волне общего недовольства тем, что пишут современные авторы про старославянские культуры, сесть перечитать «Слово о полку». Офигенная всё-таки штука. Очнулся, когда перечитал уже и оригинал, и все переводы (Бальмонт переводил размером Калевалы, блин! А Заболоцкий гений, но ещё лучше его текст делает то, что большая часть его идеально поётся на мотив «Три танкиста, три весёлых друга»). И тут меня

👍62

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ekho_rusi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,307,652 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Эхо Руси” (@ekho_rusi), 328 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ekho_rusi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.