Channel
@writeforfriends
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
28,852subscribers
-40 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002053984342 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @writeforfriends |
| Description | от шопоголизма здесь не лечат! я Крис, и тут много о бьюти, стиле, и настоящей жизни 📍Петербург Для особо важных писем: @writeforfriends_pr детский канал: @writeformoms инст: https://www.instagram.com/kristabely РКН https://clck.ru/3GEsVg |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/writeforfriends |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 28,852 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 28,861 | -16 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:51 | 28,877 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:51 | 28,875 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 28,877 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 28,886 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 28,892 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 28,892 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (3 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 46,865 |
| Reactions total | 853 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
853 reactions across 23 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 729 | 85.5% | |
| ⚡ | 124 | 14.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 853reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
на американском рынке активно вирусится парфюмерный бренд LORE 🩵 пользователи говорят, что ароматы очень самобытные и долгоиграющие! мне тоже интересно затестить! взяла на Usmall discovery set из пяти мини-парфюмов (арт. 16261934, промокод prosto на скидку -26%). Sublimity — светлый солнечный мускусный аромат; Lovely and a little twisted — сладковато-цветочный молочный аромат; Somewhere but nowhere — пряный, кремов…
❤13⚡1
Posted without readable text
❤26⚡5
если ваши вещи живут короткую жизнь, и портятся быстрее, чем вы их надеваете - не проходите мимо! забирайте 7 пунктов, благодаря которым вещи будут выглядеть лучше и жить дольше: от того, как убрать катышки, до обработки замши и ухода за белыми сумками. и личный камердинер не нужен!
❤16⚡6
начало осени — время для того, чтобы вернуться к своему ритму! ALL WE NEED делает этот переход эффектным и уверенным, запуская продажи своей новой капсулы «В ритме осени», в которой образы для офиса сочетаются с женственными трикотажными моделями для городских будней. по традиции, бренд выбрал премиальные материалы для своих изделий: итальянскую шерсть, шелк и хлопок, и очень красивую цветовую палитру: бордо, шоко…
❤23⚡3
🌼🌼 5 моих правил ухода за 🌼🌼 кожей вокруг глаз. Чтобы она дольше оставалась молодой и красивой!
❤51⚡6
и ловите краткую инструкцию, как их сочетать 🩵 🔘если хочется сияющую кожу и ровный тон: витамин C + ниацинамид + SPF (если днем). 🔘если беспокоят высыпания и жирный блеск: BHA-кислота + ниацинамид + цинк PCA. 🔘если остались следы после акне или есть пигментация: азелаиновая кислота, ниацинамид + витамин C. 🔘если кожа постоянно сухая и обезвоженная: гиалуроновая кислота, церамиды и сквалан. 🔘если кожа чувствитель…
❤52
попросила чат gpt сделать расширенную таблицу сочетаний активов, так как хочу скорректировать свои комбинации под потребности. делюсь с вами тоже, уверена, что пригодится! сохраняйте 📌
❤33⚡24
на Lamoda аттракцион невиданной щедрости, и очень много топовых средств можно купить со скидкой -40% 🌪️ я просто листала раздел, и хотелось добавить в корзину буквально всё! там и Olaplex, и Kevin Murphy, и QIQI, и Ultraceuticals, и Diptyque, и Genosys, и даже Floraiku - в общем много интересного!
❤42⚡9
девочки, в ряду классных банок для волос пополнение! сильно понравилась эта парочка Electron Cosmetics 🤍 в основе бренда активированная электронная вода (отсюда и название) и компоненты, полученных из редких культур, многие из которых веками применялись в традиционной восточной медицине. кто, как не японцы, может такое придумать! мое первое касание случилось с шампунем и кондиционером — базой, на которую я планирую…
❤32⚡7
много интересных новинок на Usmall, например Biologique Recherche, Obagi и 111skin (но тут цены совсем непривлекательные, зато ассортимент почти полный, для любителей). закажу маску Vivant от BR, была у меня однажды и прям понравилась! а кто любит Obagi, что порекомендуете? промокод PROSTO на скидку -26%, на скринах цены выше, чем с ним.
❤25⚡8
мое происхождение всегда было для меня загадкой, так как я знаю родственников только на четыре поколения назад, и все они — русские! но мои внешние данные говорят о том, что в роду есть другие нации, и наконец-то я узнаю, какие именно 💔 взяла себе генетический тест на происхождение от MyGenetics, результат будет через ~30 дней, обязательно поделюсь им с вами! жду с нетерпением :) а в видео рассказала, как я собираю…
❤32⚡9
у Caudalie есть чудесная линейка, которую оценят обладатели жирной и проблемной кожи - Vinopure 🍇 в ее основе - натуральные ингредиенты получаемые из винограда, а центральное место занимает, конечно же, салициловая кислота. вся линейка служит отличным союзником в борьбе с несовершенствами, работает мягко и деликатно, но при этом - высокоэффективно. Все продукты работают над разными задачами, но стремятся к одному р…
❤37⚡6
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @writeforfriends. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 253,832 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“и просто так” (@writeforfriends), 28,852 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/writeforfriends.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.