myrrrka💗 pinned a photo

Channel
myrrrka💗
@myyyyyrkaaa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,624subscribers
-530 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001771567046 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @myyyyyrkaaa |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/myyyyyrkaaa |
Topic
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 9,624 | -64 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 9,688 | -31 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:36 | 9,719 | -46 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:38 | 9,765 | -39 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:15 | 9,804 | -35 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:19 | 9,839 | -61 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 9,900 | -27 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 9,927 | -57 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 9,984 | -18 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 10,002 | -9 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 10,011 | -11 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 10,022 | -28 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 10,050 | -12 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 10,062 | -12 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:43 | 10,074 | -20 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 10,094 | -25 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 10,119 | -16 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 10,135 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 10,140 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 10,152 | first reading |
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.60%
- avg views ÷ 9,624 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 250
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 15.2%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (21 July 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 750 |
| Reactions total | 114 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 9s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
476 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 154 | 32.4% | |
| 💔 | 110 | 23.1% | |
| 💘 | 78 | 16.4% | |
| 🥰 | 72 | 15.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 34 | 7.14% | |
| 😍 | 22 | 4.62% | |
| custom 5307956700223924560 | 6 | 1.26% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 476 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
{ Вы что творите LIBREDERM?! Это что за люкс?💔} >>> Mezolux- премиальная линейка, баночки просто вау Очень красиво, стильно и дорого выглядят, я влюбилась в упаковку ещё до того, как всё попробовала ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🤩патчи- однозначно берем, эффект волшебный!!! 🤩концентрат-детокс- очень понравился, моя кожа с ним выглядит свежей и отдохнувшей 🤩концентрат-миорелаксант- кожа становится очень- очень гладкой 🤩осветляющий к…
❤🔥6❤5😍4
{Необыкновенноеееее секретное пространство на Китай-городе💔🍔🍳} >>>место, куда хочется прийти не только поесть, но и всё рассматривать Советую попробовать: 🎀завтраки-конструкторы- очень очень вкусно, подача заслуживает отдельного внимание, посмотрите на это масло🥺 🎀 круассан жамбо-огромный, хрустящий и идеальный к кофе 🎀 эйфелева вафля- невероятно красивый десерт, который ещё и очень вкусный 🎀 аффогато- кофе с моро…
❤18❤🔥14💘12
{Вы знаете, как я обожаю ВкусВилл💛} >>> у меня гиперфикс на их новинки: 🌟торт Мальдивские каникулы с крем-чиз - готова есть его банками, низкокалорийный и безумно вкусный 🌟суп с лисичками и беконом- лучший суп, который я ела, насыщенный, берите 🌟фетучини с курицей и лисичками- нежные, сливочные, вкусные 🌟колбаски куриные с лисичками- очень необычно, для разнообразия самое то 🌟низкокалорийные лимонады-заказываю кажд…
❤21😍18❤🔥12custom 53079567002239245604
Лето♥️🍓🍓
❤27💘14🥰10custom 53079567002239245601
Победитель @kristinami21🩷
💔64🥰30💘12❤8
>>> Заявляю энто самый красивый маникюр в моей жизни в любимом салоне LA JOIE ♥️ Приехала обновить маникюр и педикюр- сделала такой необычный цвет, у меня теперь гипер фикс💔 Обожаю атмосферу этой студии: уют, любимые фильмы, сериалы, вкусняшки и забота в каждой детали!!💌 {не изменяю им уже 2 года}
❤43🥰27💔20custom 53079567002239245601
{У моих любимых Oh My Toast появились завтраки, в которые я просто влюбиласьяя🥹💔} >>> теперь у них можно собрать свой идеальный завтрак самостоятельно! Просто отмечаешь карандашом все, что хочется именно сегодня, и тебе готовят именно это 💋🥯 Мне очень понравилось, что у каждого ингредиента расписаны КБЖУ. А еще большие порции белка. Можно взять курицу или говядину по 100 или 200 грамм за очень адекватную цену🙌🏻 И…
💘40❤32💔26🥰5❤🔥2
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @myyyyyrkaaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@nodaywithoutbeauty · 29,987
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
@ba_polly · 24,775
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 September 2026
@leya_leyaaa · 33,086
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 6 September 2026
@dgrbeauty · 45,115
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
@witheireen · 37,433
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
@divaddii · 30,419
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 7 September 2026
@agdedana · 27,160
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
@veimale · 24,455
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 September 2026
@nastyaabeautyy · 31,671
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 6 September 2026
@sofia_molz · 46,742
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
@qksenia · 24,202
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 September 2026
@blablagirl1 · 45,878
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
@yyulias4 · 27,667
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
@rassadinairina · 23,471
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 September 2026
@NechaevaBlog · 43,516
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
@hotelsnight · 32,688
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 September 2026
@kseny_patches · 33,804
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
@innamakeru · 59,200
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 August 2026
@writeforfriends · 28,892
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 9 September 2026
@alex_samohvalova_blog · 31,550
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
@tatyilina · 31,660
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
@milovidnayanna · 23,284
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 17 September 2026
@nikolskaya_life · 24,106
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
@broilinhades · 36,738
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“myrrrka💗” (@myyyyyrkaaa), 9,624 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/myyyyyrkaaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.