Алматинский вайб
🤬159😁26🤡11❤6🥰6😱6👍1🤣1

Channel
@kozachkow
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
122,621subscribers
+221 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001490840037 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kozachkow |
| Description | Для связи @Koza4kov_BOT Поддержать канал журналиста Михаила Козачкова https://www.lmv.kz/c/hWjz7Hpy Я на фейсбуке https://www.facebook.com/mikhail.kozachkov |
| Created | 6 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 67 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kozachkow |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @kozachkow/14286 · this entry19 Oct 2026, 15:58 UTC | @halyqstan/1564219 Oct 2026, 16:23 UTC | 1.00 | 26 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @qogamnews | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 56 minutes | this entry (8–2) |
| @halyqstan | 31 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 55 minutes | this entry (17–14) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 387 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 18:04 | 122,621 | +1,685 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 14:45 | 120,936 | +100 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 22:35 | 120,836 | -85 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 15:47 | 120,921 | -33 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 16:55 | 120,954 | -31 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 17:11 | 120,985 | -22 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 14:27 | 121,007 | -13 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:37 | 121,020 | +11 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:06 | 121,009 | -90 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 09:51 | 121,099 | -49 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:18 | 121,148 | -9 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 11:48 | 121,157 | +137 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:16 | 121,020 | -17 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 07:25 | 121,037 | -28 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 121,065 | -36 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 10:37 | 121,101 | +76 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 09:15 | 121,025 | -61 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 10:46 | 121,086 | -21 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:19 | 121,107 | -41 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:10 | 121,148 | first reading |
470 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 204 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 470 (1 August 2026 – 14 November 2026) |
| Views total | 4,700,900 |
| Reactions total | 68,000 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 16:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 146 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
288,534 reactions across 462 posts, in 69 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 113,732 | 39.4% | |
| 👍 | 62,971 | 21.8% | |
| 🤬 | 22,346 | 7.74% | |
| 🤣 | 15,261 | 5.29% | |
| 🤡 | 13,610 | 4.72% | |
| 😱 | 7,403 | 2.57% | |
| 😁 | 7,383 | 2.56% | |
| 👎 | 6,661 | 2.31% | |
| 🤯 | 5,535 | 1.92% | |
| 💩 | 5,306 | 1.84% | |
| 🤮 | 5,281 | 1.83% | |
| 🔥 | 3,622 | 1.26% | |
| 🤔 | 2,783 | 0.965% | |
| 👏 | 2,348 | 0.814% | |
| 💯 | 2,289 | 0.793% | |
| 🥱 | 2,183 | 0.757% | |
| 🍾 | 1,273 | 0.441% | |
| 😢 | 1,131 | 0.392% | |
| 😭 | 960 | 0.333% | |
| 🎉 | 766 | 0.265% | |
| 49 further kinds | 5,690 | 1.97% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 470 of the 470 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 293,193 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 470 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kozachkow. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 470 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 49 of 129 posts held from the last 30 days (38.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Алматинский вайб
🤬159😁26🤡11❤6🥰6😱6👍1🤣1
Хороший фильм сняла Генеральная прокуратура о возвращенных за 4 года активах. Речь идет о деньгах и имуществе олигархов и коррупционеров - часть объектов они отдали добровольно, часть у них конфисковали. И у нас перед глазами есть сухие цифры - в общей сложности, в страну вернули 1,3 триллиона тенге. На эти деньги построили и отремонтировали 466 объектов - школы, больницы, спортивные и инфраструктурные сооружения. 3…
❤457👍381🤡74🔥30😁24🤮12💩7👏2
Сборная Казахстана по футболу продолжает свое позорное выступление в Лиге Наций - вчера наши лучшие футболисты изучили достопримечательности Кишинева и заодно проиграли Молдове - 2:1. Таким образом, фиксируем, чем заканчивается футбольный сезон в Казахстане. 1. Весной в федерации сменились топ-менеджеры, в частности, генсеком стал британец Скотт Манн. 2. Летом из сборной ушел отечественный тренер Талгат Байсуфинов…
😁109🤡90❤29👎15😱12🤣11💯7🤮5
Тем временем, продолжаются задержания офицеров Министерства обороны - вопросы к ним возникли в результате проверки, назначенной после трагедии во время учений на Каспии. О первых арестах я уже рассказывал - в изолятор были отправлены снабженцы из двух частей, плюс один высокопоставленный сотрудник Главного управления военной инфраструктуры министерства. Вторую партию взяли в Актобе, где изучили работу Военного инст…
👍517❤393🔥82🤡15🤬10🤔9🤣5🙏3
Поздравляю Вадима Николаевича Борейко с днем рождения. На мой взгляд, он по-прежнему журналист номер 1 в стране. А еще сегодня судья Айдар Утебеков постановил взыскать с журналиста Вадима Борейко 43 млн тенге в пользу стройкомпании ТОО «Etude-Ybyrai». Мне кажется, это рекорд по искам к журналистам.
🤬405👍146😱96💩23❤17🤡17🤯13🤣8
«Деления на своих и чужих не будет»: Токаев высказался о громких задержаниях в «Самрук-Қазыне» и КТЖ Президент провел оперативное совещание Совета Безопасности после громких задержаний руководства фонда «Самрук-Қазына» и нацкомпании «Қазақстан темір жолы». Касым-Жомарт Токаев назвал случившееся чрезвычайно серьезным сигналом о масштабной коррупции в госсекторе и предупредил: исключений из закона не будет ни для кого…
❤524👍455😁94🤡75🥱40🤮15👎9🤣3
Ошалеть
❤339😱160🤬39😭7🔥5🤯2😁1
Ничего особенного, просто в одном из кафе Актобе произошел взрыв газовоздушной смеси. Возможно, баллон. Уроки Щучинска явно никто не извлек.
❤361🤯96😢24😱16💔5🤔2
В последнее время в Threads все чаще встречаются публикации с жалобами на верификацию IMEI в Казахстане. Причем складывается впечатление, что волна недовольства заметно усилилась. Люди критикуют систему, рассказывают о сложностях, требуют отменить действующие требования. Но есть один любопытный факт. Заходишь в профили некоторых, особенно активных критиков, а там - продажа смартфонов, привезенных из ОАЭ и предложени…
👍108❤89🤡72👎23🤮12💯5🤯2😁2
13 ноября 2026 года под председательством Главы государства Касым-Жомарта Токаева состоится оперативное совещание Совета Безопасности Республики Казахстан по вопросам развития транспортно-логистической сферы. В ходе совещания Президент изложит принципиальную позицию государства в связи с задержанием по подозрению в совершении коррупционного преступления руководителей АО «Самрук-Қазына» и АО «НК «Қазақстан темір жолы…
👍608❤390🤡96🤣30🤮14🔥12🐳3🤔2
Задержание главы «Самрук-Казына» Нурлана Жакупова и первого руководителя КТЖ Елжаса Отыншиева - настоящая сенсация, поскольку очень давно не было громких арестов по коррупционным преступлениям. В какой-то момент мне даже стало казаться, что топ-менеджеры нацкомпаний, а также чиновники высшего ранга окончательно избавились от вируса взяточничества. Тем более, государство создает им неплохие условия - тот же Жакупов з…
👍730❤433💯72🤔19🤡12😁11🤬6🔥5
По предварительным данным, в деле о коррупционном преступлении Нурлана Жакупова и Елжаса Отыншиева фигурирует сумма в 6 миллионов долларов. Мой источник сообщает, что деньги с балкона в чемодане сбросила жена одного из подозреваемых, когда в дверь постучали. Это не официальная информация.
👍491❤333🤣191🤯43😱41👏5🍾4👀4
Showing the 12 most recent of 470 posts we hold for @kozachkow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@kozachkow edited 16 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 1 post on @kozachkow as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что нужно изменить в системе налогообложения?
The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 470 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 54 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 95 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kozachkov offside” (@kozachkow), 122,621 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kozachkow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.