Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Казахский чуваш

@kazchuvash

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

25,546subscribers

+271 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001583757440
TypeChannel
Username@kazchuvash
Description🇰🇿 Аналитика, журналистские расследования, экспертное мнение. Авторский канал журналиста Кирилла Павлова (свидетельство СМИ №KZ35VPY00141504 от 09.02.2026). Обратная связь: @kazchuvas_bot YouTube: https://youtube.com/c/KirillPavlovKZ
Created4 August 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kazchuvash

Growth

24,98825,60225,2956 August 2026 — 25,275 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,259 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,209 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,190 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,154 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,988 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,602 subscribers13 August 2026 — 25,578 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,546 subscribers25,5466 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net +271. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,896–25,694 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:0425,546-32
13 Aug 2026, 03:2825,578-24
12 Aug 2026, 03:4225,602+614
11 Aug 2026, 02:5324,988-166
10 Aug 2026, 05:5325,154-36
9 Aug 2026, 02:3125,190-19
8 Aug 2026, 05:3525,209-50
7 Aug 2026, 07:2625,259-16
6 Aug 2026, 09:5025,275first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.1%
avg views ÷ 25,546 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,940
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.237%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held37 (29 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total235,794
Reactions total558
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 04:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,560
Videos
949
Links
1,410

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 49s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

558 reactions across 34 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍10819.4%
🤪10318.5%
6311.3%
🔥437.71%
😱427.53%
🤬376.63%
💯325.73%
👏315.56%
😎173.05%
🐳122.15%
👾111.97%
👀91.61%
🤔71.25%
🦄71.25%
😭61.08%
🏆50.896%
😡50.896%
💩40.717%
🍾30.538%
😈30.538%
6 further kinds101.79%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 558reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 34 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kazchuvash. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC≈3,760 views9 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @fund_anticorr

💬 ИЗЪЯТИЕ POWERBANK У КИРИЛЛА ПАВЛОВА ВЫЗВАЛО ВОЛНУ БОТОВ В ЗАЩИТУ АЭРОПОРТА АСТАНЫ История с изъятым у Кирилла Павлова powerbank в аэропорту Астаны вызвала вопросы к процедуре досмотра и единообразию применения правил. После публикации ФБРК также обратил внимание на другие претензии пассажиров к работе столичного аэропорта. 🔵 Что произошло на досмотре 12 августа 2026 года Кирилл Павлов сообщил, что при досмотре в

🤪52👏1💯1

14 Aug 2026, 06:11 UTC≈73,200 views6 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026

Ладно, оставим мой powerbank сотруднице аэропорта, не велика потеря. Расскажите лучше в комментариях что у вас изымали в аэропорту и при каких обстоятельствах? Считаете ли вы это справедливым? t.me/kazchuvash

🤔3👍1👏1🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC≈3,250 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Лучший подарок на день рождения Сделала пиар-служба международного аэропорта Нурсултана Назарбаева, направившая ботоферму в комментарии. Кстати, боты у них украинские - куча факторов свидетельствует об этом. Ну и работают они не как наши, а методичка с тезисами одна, притом лентяи постят одинаковые тексты. Спалили всю сетку 🤭 t.me/kazchuvash

👏5🤬4🤪2😎1

13 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC≈3,250 views26 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Как говорила адвокат минсельхоза Тапкина: «ездит по своим америкам и саранчу нашу обсуждает, не уведомив правительство. Не радеет за Родину». Раз адвокат сказала - надо соответствовать. Хотя, какая саранча - её давно побороли. Прилетел почитать бесплатных американских сайтов с бесплатными данными про ученого Эль-Ниньо, как говорил какой-то вице-премьер. Шучу, конечно, но если верить комментаторам, то прилетел в Г

👍15🔥8🤪3

12 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC≈30,800 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026

ИИзм Вполне возможно мы стоим на пороге нового типа государственного строя, основанного на ИИ. Илон Маск в своих проповедях уже играет на тонких струнах души и обещает большинству сибаритство с безбедной старостью - вкатывать, мол, будут роботы, а не человек. Хотя где-то мы уже это слышали. В принципе, и с учётом старлинка, строительства дата-центров на орбите, а теории такое возможно. В СХ роботизация развивается о

5👍5👏1💩1

12 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC≈1,900 views27 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Гипервоспаленный синдром вахтера столичного аэропорта На досмотре при вылете из международного аэропорта Нурсултана Назарбаева изъяли powerbank. Старый рабочий powerbank, повидавший десятки аэропортов. Причиной оказалась трещина на корпусе. Попросил показать каким документом регламентируется запрет - показали памятку, в которой написано что запрещено провозить ПОВРЕЖДЕННЫЕ БАТАРЕИ. Пытался объяснить что корпус - э

🤬14🤪3🤷3💯2😡2😭2💩1

11 Aug 2026, 04:40 UTC≈3,850 views14 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Это же ДВГА по Акмолинской области просто забыл поменять старый текст на стенде? Или нет? #nazarbayev #pervyi_president t.me/kazchuvash

😱8🤪4👀2

10 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC≈4,400 views36 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Комариное ПВО от китайцев. Предполагаю, очень эффективно заменит инсектицидный барьер между водоемами и городами. У нас наверное Павлодар будет первым, ну или куда там уйдет Байхан. t.me/kazchuvash

🔥20😱8👍3👾3👀1💯1

10 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTCviews —

Казахский чуваш pinned «Наверняка среди моих читателей есть руководители из ОСДП и у меня к ним вопросы: Знаю ли в головном офисе, что творят их адепты в районах? Почему действия щучинских социал-демократов носят откровенно рейдерский характер? Понимает ли партия, что их ушки торчат…»

8 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC≈3,150 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Наверняка среди моих читателей есть руководители из ОСДП и у меня к ним вопросы: Знаю ли в головном офисе, что творят их адепты в районах? Почему действия щучинских социал-демократов носят откровенно рейдерский характер? Понимает ли партия, что их ушки торчат изо всех щелей, а деструктивные действия членов, активно агитирующих за них, вызывают социальное раздражение у довольно большой группы людей, объединенных в да

4👏2💯2🤬1

8 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC≈3,070 views29 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Не понимаю почему тостующего на свадьбе называют «проповедником». Точнее, догадываюсь с чьей подачи, но всему своё время. Это не безобидное чудачество пожилого человека. Это публичная попытка подменить нормы светского государства архаичной догмой, притом на чужом празднике, при десятках свидетелей и с претензией на роль морального авторитета. И то, что понадобилось вмешательство правоохранительных органов, показывае

18👏6👀2🙊2👎1

8 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC≈2,120 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Надо отдать должное - в тредс боты-провокаторы правительства реагируют быстро. Но глупо. t.me/kazchuvash

👍10👏1🤪1

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @kazchuvash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 998,204 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Zakon.kz - Новости Казахстана и мира
@zakonkz · 204,110
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
Kozachkov offside
@kozachkow · 122,226
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
Qumash
@qumash_kz · 120,971
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
ZTB NEWS - Новости Казахстана
@ztb_qaz · 177,854
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
Tengrinews.kz - Новости Казахстана
@tengrinews · 253,903
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Казахский чуваш” (@kazchuvash), 25,546 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kazchuvash.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.