Главная интрига постэлекторального периода – кто станет Премьер-министром и кто получит пост Вице-президента.

Channel
ARSEN SARSEKOV
@house_of_cards_qr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,211subscribers
-107 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001228766229 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @house_of_cards_qr |
| Created | 11 February 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/house_of_cards_qr |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 8,211 | -8 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 8,219 | -7 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:21 | 8,226 | -11 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 8,237 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 8,245 | +5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 8,240 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 8,246 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 8,249 | -22 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 8,271 | -9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 8,280 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:37 | 8,286 | -16 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 8,302 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 8,309 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 8,318 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 8,318 | first reading |
Engagement
57 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 34.0%
- avg views ÷ 8,211 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,790
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 57 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 57 (21 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 19,520 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 37m 03s
- Average length
- 2m 19s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Айбек Дадебай – первый спикер Құрылтай Республики Казахстан. Его карьерная траектория: 2008–2011 – эксперт Аппарата Сената Парламента РК, и. о. помощника Председателя Сената. 2011–2013 – атташе, третий секретарь Постоянного представительства Казахстана при ООН в Женеве. 2013–2019 – заместитель заведующего, затем заведующий Секретариатом Председателя Сената Парламента РК. 2019–2021 – заместитель начальника Канцел…
Правительство сложило свои полномочия перед вновь избранным Курултаем.
Вот от второй модели действительно необходимо уходить. И это, судя по полной цитате, именно то, о чём говорил президент: молодёжь не должна воспринимать себя как поколение людей, которым заранее предопределено быть жертвами обстоятельств. Он прямо говорил о необходимости воспитывать оптимистов, а не неуверенных в себе людей, которые бесконечно жалуются на жизнь. 5. Важная оговорка Я бы не стал говорить, что любое о…
26 августа Токаев связал две интересные вещи: отказ от образа «вечно горюющей нации» и необходимость воспитывать молодых людей как оптимистов, уверенных в себе и способных преодолевать трудности. И только после этого прозвучала формула: «Мы – нация победителей». Причём сразу же было уточнено, что речь идёт о нации, которая смотрит вперёд и не ищет причины своих трагедий, поражений и неудач в историческом прошлом и др…
«Ак жол»: ставка на опыт и новые лица «Ак жол» представил депутатов, которые будут представлять партию в новом Курултае. В команде — опытные парламентарии, предприниматели, региональные лидеры и представители нового поколения. Дания Еспаева – лидер партии, опытный парламентарий. Три созыва Мажилиса, работа вице-спикером и большой опыт в банковско-финансовой сфере. Асылхан Кожахметов – один из ключевых партийных ор…
📁📁📁 ✔️ ОСДП назвала восемь депутатов нового состава Курултая Общенационально социал-демократическая партия представила список из восьми своих представителей, которые будут работать в новом составе Курултая. 💬 Как сообщили в пресс-службе партии, по итогам заседания Президиума ОСДП список кандидатов, которые будут представлять партию в Курултае Республики Казахстан, был единогласно поддержан. В состав Курултая от О…
Началась серия кадровых решений. Тимур Сулейменов переназначен председателем Национального банка. Ермек Сагимбаев сохраняет пост председателя КНБ.
Эксит-пол: прогноз распределения голосов По предварительным данным эксит-пола, в новый Құрылтай проходят 5 политических партий: 1. «Әділет» 2. «Ауыл» 3. «Respublica» 4. ОСДП 5. «Ақ жол» Не преодолевают проходной барьер: • НПК • «Байтақ» Таким образом, новый Құрылтай формируется как пятипартийный парламент, при этом основная интрига заключается в соотношении сил внутри прошедшей пятёрки.
Алматы: эффект сверхобычной явки В Алматы явка составила 43,23%. Для города это очень высокий показатель: обычно здесь голосует порядка 30% избирателей. Для сравнения: последний сопоставимый уровень был зафиксирован в 2004 году – около 41%. Возникает главный вопрос: куда ушёл этот дополнительный электоральный ресурс? Алматы традиционно отличается более прохладным отношением к партии власти. Поэтому рост явки потен…
Агитационный период официально завершён. С этого момента любая форма предвыборной агитации запрещена. Наступает день тишины.🤫
🖐✋👏 ОСДП больше не нужно представлять. За эту кампанию партию узнали. Услышали. Запомнили. И главное – у ОСДП появилось новое политическое реноме. Из участника выборов она выходит как одна из наиболее авторитетных и заметных сил. №2 в списке. 23 августа – выбираем. Контролируем. Требуем.
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @house_of_cards_qr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто победит?
- Кайрат 🏆75%
- Ордабасы 💙19%
- Ничья8%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@eurobri · 36,232
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
@alibekovkz · 54,021
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
@obozhau1 · 24,898
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 September 2026
@nehabar · 70,851
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 August 2026
@elinfo_kz · 32,504
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 5 September 2026
@basekz · 48,737
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
@fund_anticorr · 80,463
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
@toughbuthones · 22,425
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 September 2026
@kaztag_tg · 89,160
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 August 2026
@yedilov_online · 88,721
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 August 2026
@orda_kz · 132,508
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
@gosrating · 22,303
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 September 2026
@sportilinet · 32,102
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
@aqorda_resmi · 79,553
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
@kazchuvash · 24,619
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
@YerzhanY · 31,949
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
@chinovnik_kz · 32,162
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
@atamekenbusiness · 74,851
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 August 2026
@poedem_kz · 60,714
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 August 2026
@FINANCEkaz · 56,470
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
@kozachkow · 121,476
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
@prokadrykz · 80,966
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 18 August 2026
@qumash_kz · 120,399
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
@kriminal_kazakhstan · 22,979
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ARSEN SARSEKOV” (@house_of_cards_qr), 8,211 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/house_of_cards_qr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.