Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Аман Алимбаев

Channel

Аман Алимбаев

@amaninvest

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,342subscribers

-46 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001381222384
TypeChannel
Username@amaninvest
Created16 October 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/amaninvest

Growth

15,34215,38815,3656 August 2026 — 15,388 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,388 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,385 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,379 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,371 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,378 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,364 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,355 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,356 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,348 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,344 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,342 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 12 days, net -46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,335–15,395 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 18:5315,342-2
16 Aug 2026, 15:3715,344-4
15 Aug 2026, 01:3515,348-8
13 Aug 2026, 15:0515,356+1
12 Aug 2026, 15:2815,355-9
11 Aug 2026, 16:1715,364-14
10 Aug 2026, 13:3515,378+7
9 Aug 2026, 15:1815,371-8
7 Aug 2026, 10:5315,379-6
6 Aug 2026, 07:5015,385-3
6 Aug 2026, 02:2015,388no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:1615,388first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.9%
avg views ÷ 15,342 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,740
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held32 (8 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total57,640
Reactions total704
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
31s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

986 reactions across 30 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍58158.9%
30030.4%
🔥929.33%
🙏80.811%
👎30.304%
😁10.101%
😍10.101%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,026reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 32 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @amaninvest. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC≈1,010 views23 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Только что поговорил с человеком, который не поверил, что золото опережает индекс S&P500 по доходности в 21 веке. А это действительно так 😀

👍149

Signed Аман Алимбаев

17 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC≈1,500 views12 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Стать финансовым консультантом для самого себя Когда начинающий инвестор видит в программе слова доходность/риск, структура портфеля и биржевые фонды, первая реакция часто бывает такой: наверное, это сложно и мне пока рано. Но за каждым профессиональным термином стоит вполне практический вопрос. Как понять, какую доходность можно ожидать, а какая существует только в рекламе? Почему один портфель временно падает на

👍82🔥2

Signed Аман Алимбаев

16 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC≈2,030 views55 reactionsread 17 August 2026

С $2 млрд до $400 млн: цена концентрации капитала В эти выходные Алматы обсуждает Канье Уэста. Я тоже решил посмотреть на его историю, только с точки зрения финансов. Музыка сделала Канье мировой звездой. Но миллиардером его сделали не альбомы, а кроссовки. Бренд Yeezy принадлежал Канье, Adidas отвечал за производство и продажу обуви, а артист получал процент с каждой продажи. Чем больше пар покупали, тем больше он

🔥2716👍12

Signed Аман Алимбаев

15 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈1,910 views12 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Лето заканчивается, новый поток начинается В выходной день меньше всего хочется читать длинный пост о финансах. Поэтому сегодня коротко. Уже 20 августа начинается новый поток моего практического акселератора по личным финансам и инвестициям. Если вы давно хотели разобраться со своими деньгами и инвестициями, но не знали, с чего начать, мы пройдём этот путь вместе. Начнём не с вопроса «что купить?», а с вашей фина

👍101🔥1

Signed Аман Алимбаев

15 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC≈1,840 views19 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Если всё меняется, зачем нужна инвестиционная политика? После прошлого поста один из клиентов задал хороший вопрос: какой смысл составлять инвестиционную политику, если меняются рынки, ставки, валютные курсы, политическая ситуация и сама жизнь? Как говорится, хочешь рассмешить Бога - расскажи ему о своих планах. В этом есть доля правды. Мы не знаем, какой будет инфляция через пять лет, сколько будет стоить доллар

👍108🔥1

Signed Аман Алимбаев

14 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC≈1,920 views21 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Каждое такое действие по отдельности может выглядеть разумным. Но вместе они не обязательно ведут человека туда, куда ему действительно нужно. Поэтому мы начинаем не с выбора конкретной акции, валюты или фонда. Сначала вместе разбираемся в финансовом положении человека, его семье, обязательствах и планах. Затем определяем правила и только после этого подбираем инструменты. Мне важно, чтобы после нашей работы клиент

👍14🔥61

Signed Аман Алимбаев

14 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC≈1,980 views13 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Финансовый план, инвестиционная политика и мандат Путь к запуску Aman Invest Ltd занял много времени. Пока мы проходили проверки и выстраивали внутренние процессы, я всё думал о том, что за каждым портфелем стоит конкретный человек, его семья и планы на будущее. Поэтому мне важно не просто предложить инвестиционное решение, а помочь клиенту понять, какую задачу оно решает и почему подходит именно ему. За вопросом «

👍93🔥1

Signed Аман Алимбаев

12 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC≈2,320 views9 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Posted without readable text

7👍1😁1

Signed Аман Алимбаев

11 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC≈2,860 views47 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Тенге или доллары: стоит ли уходить из тенговых депозитов? В разговорах с потенциальными клиентами я всё чаще слышу вопрос: оставаться в тенговых депозитах с высокой ставкой или уже переводить деньги в доллары? На сегодняшний день базовая ставка Национального банка составляет 16,75%, а годовая инфляция за июнь составила 10,3%. Если бы инвестор действительно получил 16,75% за год, а инфляция за тот же период состав

👍2918

Signed Аман Алимбаев

11 Aug 2026, 07:43 UTC≈2,710 views6 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Новый поток акселератора. Старт 20 августа 20 августа начинаем новый поток моего практического акселератора по личным финансам и инвестициям. За время программы каждый участник по шагам разберёт собственную финансовую ситуацию, определит цели и соберёт финансово-инвестиционный план, по которому сможет дальше самостоятельно управлять своим капиталом. Будем разбирать: - личные и семейные финансы и финансовые цели; -

5👎1

Signed Аман Алимбаев

10 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC≈2,660 views49 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Хотим инвестировать на 15 лет. Деньги понадобятся через три года На консультациях периодически встречается ситуация. Через три-четыре года семья хочет перейти на доход от капитала, хотя сам капитал планирует держать в инвестициях ещё около пятнадцати лет. При этом одного горизонта инвестирования мало, чтобы понять, каким должен быть портфель. Поэтому я обычно уточняю: представьте, что проходит три-четыре года, вы

24👍21🙏4

Signed Аман Алимбаев

6 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC≈3,510 views54 reactions3 Starsread 17 August 2026

Не обещать лишнего После одной встречи я ехал домой и думал, почему в профессиональной среде иногда возникает ощущение, что я работаю немного иначе, чем принято. Возможно, дело в том, что я внимательнее отношусь к рискам, дольше проверяю решения и не люблю заранее обещать клиенту определённую доходность. В финансовой сфере можно работать проще: уверенно называть ожидаемую доходность, показывать удачные периоды, дел

👍467🔥1

Signed Аман Алимбаев

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @amaninvest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 232,565 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Kozachkov offside
@kozachkow · 122,126
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
ZTB NEWS - Новости Казахстана
@ztb_qaz · 177,663
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Аман Алимбаев” (@amaninvest), 15,342 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amaninvest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.