Торговлю долларами на внебиржевом рынке показали на графике @DataHub_FCBK
❤3👌2👍2

Channel
@DataHub_FCBK
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,812subscribers
+100 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001388375529 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DataHub_FCBK |
| Description | DATA HUB Powered by FCBK Аналитический канал с самыми актуальными данными по финансовым, околофинансовым и социальным темам. Здесь вся рыночная аналитика. На казахском: https://t.me/DataHUB_KZ Автор - Первое кредитное бюро. Для связи @DataHubFCBK_bot |
| Created | 30 December 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DataHub_FCBK |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 09:36 | 11,812 | -7 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 16:46 | 11,819 | +11 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 06:56 | 11,808 | +7 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 00:48 | 11,801 | +13 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 22:46 | 11,788 | +7 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 00:17 | 11,781 | +13 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 01:24 | 11,768 | +2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 02:29 | 11,766 | -3 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 01:57 | 11,769 | +3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 02:29 | 11,766 | -6 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 00:05 | 11,772 | +7 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:29 | 11,765 | +4 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 21:36 | 11,761 | -1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:38 | 11,762 | +11 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 21:30 | 11,751 | +9 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:38 | 11,742 | -2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 23:10 | 11,744 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 21:36 | 11,748 | -2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:56 | 11,750 | +4 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:51 | 11,746 | first reading |
55 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 55 (24 July 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 43,590 |
| Reactions total | 292 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 09:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
917 reactions across 55 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 290 | 31.6% | |
| 👍 | 239 | 26.1% | |
| 👌 | 80 | 8.72% | |
| 🤔 | 45 | 4.91% | |
| 😁 | 43 | 4.69% | |
| 🔥 | 41 | 4.47% | |
| 🤯 | 38 | 4.14% | |
| 😢 | 37 | 4.03% | |
| 🤡 | 19 | 2.07% | |
| ✍ | 17 | 1.85% | |
| 😭 | 13 | 1.42% | |
| 👨💻 | 11 | 1.20% | |
| 🤮 | 8 | 0.872% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 0.545% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 0.545% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 0.436% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 0.436% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 0.327% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.327% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.218% | |
| 8 further kinds | 10 | 1.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 917 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (52.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Торговлю долларами на внебиржевом рынке показали на графике @DataHub_FCBK
❤3👌2👍2
Внебиржевые торги долларами между БВУ обновили рекорд В октябре объем операций БВУ по покупке долларов на внебиржевом рынке достиг $40,8 млрд, что в пересчете по средневзвешенному курсу сделки эквивалентно 18,3 трлн ₸. Доля банков-нерезидентов в структуре предложения составила 86%, резидентов — 14%. Объем продаж сформировался на близком к покупкам уровне — $40,7 млрд (18,2 трлн ₸). В процентном соотношении спрос ра…
❤3👌3👍3
Стоимость проезда в поездах РК снизилась рекордными темпами В октябре проезд в поездах внутриреспубликанского сообщения подешевел на 7,3% в сравнении с сентябрем. Это максимальное снижение цен в месячном выражении за доступную историю наблюдений с января 2011 года, свидетельствуют данные БНС АСПиР РК. Для понимания контекста, сами по себе услуги железнодорожного транспорта дешевеют относительно редко. Уменьшением ц…
😁8👌3❤2👏1🤣1
Рост производства грибов проиллюстрирован на графике @DataHub_FCBK
❤7👌3👍2
В Казахстане подскочил сбор культивируемых грибов. Но растет ли перспективность отрасли? Валовый сбор грибов в защищенном грунте по итогам девяти месяцев увеличился почти на 60% г/г, до 445 т. Расчеты основаны на данных БНС АСПиР РК, полученных по результатам сплошного обследования юридических лиц, ИП, крестьянских и фермерских хозяйств. Среди трех истекших кварталов наиболее высокое значение фиксируется по итогам …
👍7❤3👌3
Каким выдался III квартал для банковского сектора? Коротко разбираем основные финансовые результаты БВУ, отраженные в свежем отчете НБРК. 🔸За девять месяцев банки заработали прибыль в размере 1,8 трлн ₸. Без поправки на инфляцию показатель просел на 11,6% к тому же периоду 2025 года. Распределение объемов сохраняется неравномерным: 79% приходится на пятерку крупнейших игроков, на топ-3 — 67%. Единственным банком, по…
👍5❤4🤔3
Сколько в среднем зарабатывают руководители в иностранных компаниях в разбивке по отраслям, показали на графике @DataHub_FCBK
❤6👍5👌4
🤑💼В РК иностранные компании платят руководителям на 40% больше в сравнении с остальными частными Средняя зарплата руководителей в иностранных компаниях составляет 1,4 млн ₸ с учетом налогов и других обязательных платежей, тогда как в компаниях негосударственного корпоративного сектора — 998 тыс. ₸.* Об этом свидетельствуют результаты выборочного обследования предприятий БНС АСПиР РК за апрель 2026 года. Наибольшая …
❤9👍4🔥2
Как Нацбанк объясняет решение о снижении базовой ставки? 🔸В годовом выражении инфляция сбавляет обороты в течение 12 последних месяцев, значение сентября — 9,3%. Темпы роста цен снижаются в продовольственном и непродовольственном сегментах (сильно дешевеют фрукты и овощи, мясо и ГСМ дорожают слабее обычного), тогда как в сегменте платных услуг динамика отсутствует. 🔸Улучшаются инфляционные ожидания. Население на го…
❤11👍4👌3💩1
❗️❗️❗️Нацбанк снизил базовую ставку до 15,75%
🤯34❤16🤔7👍3💔2🙊2👀1🤡1
Posted without readable text
❤4
Скачок переводов пенсионных денег в частное управление отобразили на графике @DataHub_FCBK
🤔11👍8❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @DataHub_FCBK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@DataHub_FCBK edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 71 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DATA HUB” (@DataHub_FCBK), 11,812 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DataHub_FCBK.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.