Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 6 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 7 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 35 of the 43 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 42 comparable posts for this entry, running 10 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 7 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @almatynews_kaz. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 7 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
62 measurements spanning 96 days, net -819. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,119–18,184 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 14:15
17,242
-17
9 Nov 2026, 15:59
17,259
-15
8 Nov 2026, 07:54
17,274
-15
7 Nov 2026, 04:37
17,289
-8
6 Nov 2026, 04:26
17,297
-10
5 Nov 2026, 05:45
17,307
-11
4 Nov 2026, 05:57
17,318
-10
3 Nov 2026, 07:44
17,328
-11
2 Nov 2026, 05:48
17,339
-10
1 Nov 2026, 02:41
17,349
-11
30 Oct 2026, 23:36
17,360
-19
29 Oct 2026, 21:46
17,379
-7
28 Oct 2026, 20:50
17,386
-10
27 Oct 2026, 22:16
17,396
-7
26 Oct 2026, 23:40
17,403
-5
26 Oct 2026, 01:06
17,408
-5
24 Oct 2026, 21:56
17,413
-5
24 Oct 2026, 00:19
17,418
-6
22 Oct 2026, 22:05
17,424
-7
21 Oct 2026, 21:50
17,431
first reading
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.88%
avg views ÷ 17,242 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,530
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.359%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
47 (10 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
27,570
Reactions total
94
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 17:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,510
Videos
≈6,630
Links
≈2,030
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
22m 02s
Average length
49s
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
403 reactions across 41 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
149
37.0%
❤
79
19.6%
🤬
53
13.2%
🤣
37
9.18%
😱
34
8.44%
🤡
18
4.47%
😁
11
2.73%
🔥
5
1.24%
😭
4
0.993%
🤔
4
0.993%
🤮
3
0.744%
😡
2
0.496%
🥰
2
0.496%
⚡
1
0.248%
👎
1
0.248%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 403 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (5.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
В Алматы не хватает бассейнов для детей: родители не могут записать детей на плавание
В Алматы наблюдается нехватка мест в бассейнах для обучения детей плаванию. Даже записать ребёнка на обычные занятия становится настоящей проблемой.
Столкнулся с этой ситуацией лично: хотел отдать своих детей на плавание, однако оказалось, что практически все группы переполнены. Свободных мест нет, у тренеров нет возможности прини…
Погоня со стрельбой в Алматинской области: водителем оказался несовершеннолетний
В полиции редакции Hola News сообщили, что инцидент произошел в селе Жайнак Илийского района. Как выяснилось, за рулем автомобиля находился подросток без водительского удостоверения.
Он проигнорировал требования сотрудников полиции остановиться и продолжил движение. Полицейские применили табельное оружие и выстрелили по колесам авто, п…
Новый Гражданский кодекс Казахстана: какие изменения ждут граждан?
Своим взглядом на предстоящую реформу гражданского законодательства поделилась Маржангуль Акимжанова — доктор философии, ассоциированный профессор, руководитель отдела Института законодательства и правовой информации Республики Казахстан.
Сегодня действующий Гражданский кодекс, принятый более 30 лет назад, сталкивается с новыми вызовами, связанными …
🚨 Ночные разборки квартирантов закончились нападением на полицию
Жильцы дома снова лишились сна из-за проблемных соседей-арендаторов. Но на этот раз обычный шум перерос в настоящую ночную драку с участием группы молодых людей.
На кадрах с камер видеонаблюдения видно, как разворачивался конфликт: крики, агрессия и рукоприкладство прямо во дворе.
Жильцы, исчерпав терпение, вызвали наряд полиции. Однако прибытие стра…
Нужно ли казахстанцам запасаться продуктами и водой?
В социальных сетях распространяются сообщения с призывами заранее закупать продукты питания, питьевую воду и товары первой необходимости. Некоторые пользователи связывают подобные предупреждения с возможным экономическим кризисом и прогнозируют двукратный рост цен.
Как выяснилось, часть публикаций основана на зарубежных рекомендациях по подготовке к чрезвычайным …
Болашаққа жол: Токаев призвал предприятия страны поддержать инициативу Qarmet
Во время встречи с коллективом Qarmet в Темиртау президент Касым-Жомарт Токаев рассказал о новой социальной программе компании «Болашаққа жол» («Путь в будущее»).
Она предусматривает обучение и трудоустройство молодых специалистов, прежде всего рабочих профессий. На первом этапе программа охватит около 500 человек из разных регионов Казах…
Токаев посетил стройплощадку нового металлургического комплекса Qarmet
Президент Казахстана Касым-Жомарт Токаев посетил строительную площадку нового сортопрокатного комплекса Qarmet мощностью более 540 тысяч тонн продукции в год. Технологическим партнёром проекта выступает китайская инжиниринговая компания CERI.
Новый цех будет выпускать высокопрочную строительную арматуру классов А600 и А1000, а также уголки, швел…
Похоже, поручение Президента РК о качестве автодорог ещё не дошло до акима Алакольского района области Жетысу. Там начали якобы временно засыпать ямы землёй вместо того, чтобы использовать асфальт.
Берілген тапсырманы әдейі керісінше орындап жатқанға ұқсайды.
🇰🇿 @gosrating
ОЧЕНЬ ПРОСИМ ОТКЛИКНУТЬСЯ ОЧЕВИДЦЕВ!
2 ноября, ориентировочно с 08:00 до 09:00 утра, на остановке возле гимназии №103 произошёл тревожный случай.
Мужчина сидел на остановке, после чего ему стало плохо, он упал на землю. На остановке находилось достаточно много людей, которые стали свидетелями произошедшего.
Я незамедлительно вызвала скорую помощь. Однако оператор сообщил, что время ожидания составляет 80 минут. Че…
Полный стоп: алматинца наказали за призывы к протестам
15 суток получил 41-летний мужчина, который призывал водителей большегрузов устроить 1 ноября "полный стоп" в Алматы. В своем видеообращении автор возмущался правилами весовых ограничений и считал, что только акция протеста позволит что-то изменить.
Мужчину привлекли за призывы к организации несанкционированного массового мероприятия. Решением суда он признан в…
В ущелье Кимасар высадили 1 500 елей
31 октября в ущелье Кимасар в Алматы высадили 1 500 елей Шренка на площади 0,54 гектара. В экологической акции приняли участие около 500 человек — жители города, представители общественных и экологических организаций, бизнеса, а также городских служб.
Как сообщил заместитель акима Алматы Олжас Смагулов, это уже третья подобная акция. Всего за октябрь в горных районах города выса…
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @gruppa100baksoff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CMN.KZ @CMN_KZ · 28,197 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 September 2026
ZHEST_KZ @zhest_kz_official · 37,022 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
Kris.p.media @almatykrispi · 18,675 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 3 October 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“100baksoff Telegram” (@gruppa100baksoff), 17,242 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gruppa100baksoff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.