Channel
@kazgoodgovernance
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,129subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001208750122 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kazgoodgovernance |
| Created | 9 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kazgoodgovernance |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 2,129 | +3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 2,126 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 2,127 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:21 | 2,130 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 2,130 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (24 June 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,235 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Адам Пшеворский в 2018 году не поленился и написал целую книгу с прямым названием «Why Bother with Elections?». Его ответ: выборы – единственный придуманный механизм, при котором проигравший добровольно уходит с должности. Не оспаривает бесконечно, не устраивает переворот, а собирает вещи и надеется вернуться в следующий раз. Все остальные способы менять власть: переговоры элит, кризисы, революции – этого свойства не…
Posted without readable text
Знаете, сколько усилий я прилагаю, чтобы не комментировать какие-то вещи. В стиле тикток-психологии: не обязательно иметь мнение на все, что происходит вокруг. Но на самом деле, если воспитание не позволяет спорить с мужчинами, то лучшее, что может сделать такой кандидат в Курылтай для своей партии, это уйти. Потому что парламент это место, где спорят, где отстаивают публичный интерес и позиции. Такое публичное заявл…
В начале месяца у меня вышел текст о странных действиях операторов связи - как заметили пользователи соцсетей, им начали приходить рекламные объявления аккурат в тот момент, когда они хотели приобрести определенный товар. Например, стоило только зайти в приложение по покупке авиабилетов, как тут же падало СМС с предложением оформить поездку, но у другого продавца. Я, честно сказать, был удивлен - неужели компании, п…
Статья "Why Kazakhstan is changing where its history begins" нашего коллеги Исатая Минуарова в The Diplomat.
🤩Социальная мобильность подталкивает инновации В июле в Nature вышло исследование "Intergenerational Mobility Fosters Innovation in Europe" с атласом социальной мобильности, которое показывает: чем меньше значение "кто твои родители" и чем больше роль собственных способностей и усилий, тем больше инноваций производит регион. Неравенство возможностей лишает страну изобретателей: когда доступ к образованию жёстко при…
Можно ли ввести меры против буллинга как в Корее. При зафиксированных кейсах лишать буллеров доступа в университеты?
The shares total 146%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Выше зашэрила пост DESHT про «олигархов» -- не успела сразу вставить свои пять копеек. Смотрите, логика Коуза: make-or-buy decision бизнеса. Чем больше бизнес, тем больше рисков. Поэтому если формальная защита прав собственности не работает, компания производит эту защиту сама -- через политические связи. Это и есть "неидеальное", но рациональное институциональное равновесие. Убрали одного олигарха — вакансия закро…
«ОЛИГАРХИ» 🇫🇷 В Фонтенбло (Франция) проходит 30-я конференция Общества институциональной и организационной экономики (SIOE). На одной из сессий экономист Константин Сонин (Чикаго) предложил интересное определение «олигарха», в противовес принятому в т. ч. у нас, в Казахстане. Если упрощать, «олигархи» в экономиках переходного типа – не просто «злые дяди», которые захватили госполитику. К. Сонин применяет логику Р.…
Ну пока все радуются потрясающему результату ребят по физике, давайте я тоже напишу о том, что меня возмущает в нашем олимпиадном процессе еще с тех времен, как я сама участвовала в олимпиадах по истории Казахстана. Я сейчас не пишу про платные специализированные или коммерческие олимпиады, они хороши -- но не для всех. А для всех у нас работает система республиканских олимпиад по общеобразовательным предметам. Эта …
Photo, posted without a caption
Я хочу перейти с Яндекса на другое такси. Там постоянно какие-то коды запрашиваю, какие-то попытки войти в аккаунт. Мне не понятно, где мои данные хранятся, кто там за ними. Очень надеюсь, что где-то в Астана Хабе сейчас зреет наш собственный казахстанский сервис такси.
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @kazgoodgovernance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Можно ли ввести меры против буллинга как в Корее. При зафиксированных кейсах лишать буллеров доступа в университеты?
The shares total 146%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 224,225 of 1,507,151entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сабина Садиева” (@kazgoodgovernance), 2,129 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kazgoodgovernance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.