Channel
@cuanversecrypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,452subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001639856140 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cuanversecrypto |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cuanversecrypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 2,452 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:39 | 2,451 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 2,453 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 2,458 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 2,460 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:43 | 2,461 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 2,465 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 2,465 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
108 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 75 | 69.4% | |
| 🤣 | 11 | 10.2% | |
| 🤩 | 7 | 6.48% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 3.70% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 3.70% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 2.78% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.85% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 1.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ini adalah Top 8 Rank CEX berdasarkan Proof Of Reserve Di antara ke 8 ini memiliki keunggulan masing-masing. 1. CEX tertua (Yang paling lama beroperasi) Bitfinex, CEX ini punya histories terbaik dan terkuat yang digunakan pro trader. Bitfinex beroperasi sejak tahun 2012. Sempat terkena hack tahun 2016 yang mengakibatkan kehilangan 120K BTC, tapi pulih (socialized loss lalu redeemed). 2. Trad vol dan fitur terlen…
👍7👌1
Jangan denial di bearmarket 🤫
👍3
Sebelumnya tanggal 23 Juli BitMEX udah say goodbye. Tapi kenapa market tidak panik sama sekali ? Karena Volume Trade 24H BitMEX bahkan tidak menyentuh $100M. Selain itu marketshare nya juga hanya 0.8%. Jadi tidak akan mengganggu psikologis market. Tapi apa yang mau saya bilang ? Tidak ada CEX yang aman, BITGET aman ? OKX aman ? Kalau asetmu di dalam berarti bukan kamu pemegang kuncinya . BitMex ini salah satu CE…
🙏4👍2
Kenapa fokus ke Chain Revenue ? Chain Revenue itu keuntungan nyata yang dihasilkan oleh sebuah blockchain dari aktivitas sehari-hari user pada jaringan project tersebut. Keuntungan ini biasanya berasal dari biaya transaksi (gas fee) yang dibayar pengguna saat mereka : - Transfer token - Swap di DEX (misalnya beli memecoin) - Buka posisi trading perpetual - Pinjam uang di lending protocol, dll. Semakin banyak orang…
👍5
Kayaknya $SUI bakalan survive sih, ni ada yang chain revenue nya cuma 5.23$ bahkan gak nyampe Rp 100 ribu dalam sehari masih survive kok . Pilihan timothy kemarin bener - bener keren.
🤣11👍2
Wah revenue $SUI dalam sehari cuma 587$ atau sekitar Rp 10.5 juta . Kira-kira nih token masih bisa survive gak ya ? 🙄
👍1
Terimakasih untuk seleksi alamnya. Walaupun belum menumbangkan CEX yang gede, setidaknya ini menjadi alarm yang nyata bagi para alt holder . Sangat senang membaca news seperti ini di kala winter
🤩2👍1
Posisi perp liq $BTC di weekend kali ini cukup menarik. Ada posisi sebesar $10M berpotensi kena Liquid karena baru saja masuk market. Ini seperti newbie whale atau amateur. Angka liquid long ada di 61.600 Angka liquid short ada di level 63.600 Keduanya ini termasuk cluster yang besar karena ada whale di dalamnya Mungkin beberapa sudah pada trace di Arkham / Hyperliq
👍2
Impulsive terakhir . Karakternya akan ngeliquidasi posisi short dengan jumlah yang gede.. Sebelum nantinya akan clear posisi long pelan2 dan konsolidasinya akut. #NFA
Posisi whale bitfinex masih sama. Mereka masih standby long. Selama posisi whale bitfinex masih long, berarti market belum akan rebound.
👍5
Ternyata kalau di breakdown lebih serem lagi. Kalau $BTC nyentuh 56.000, sebesar 2 Miliar USD posisi long bakalan liquid . Jika dikonversi ke nilai rupiah sekarang, senilai 35.7 Triliun Rupiah
👍3👌1
Terdapat 2 angka likuidasi yang berat yang segera harus dilikuidasi . Umumnya ini terjadi ketika di weekend atau di awal NY Session. Kedua level tersebut yaitu di angka 62.000 dan 57.200. Yang mana yang akan disamper terlebih dahulu ?
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cuanversecrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 678,773 of 1,624,174entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CuanVerse” (@cuanversecrypto), 2,452 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cuanversecrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.