Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

IT менторы - отзывы на офферы

@it_mentors

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

22,769subscribers

+34 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001759725065
TypeChannel
Username@it_mentors
DescriptionТысячи отзывов от реальных людей, прошедших обучение у наших менторов. Осознанная Меркантильность: @m0rtymerr_channel Помощь: @itmentors_help Найти/Стать ментором: @find_it_mentor_bot Сайт IT Менторы: https://it-mentors.ru/
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/it_mentors

Growth

22,73422,77322,753.56 August 2026 — 22,735 subscribers6 August 2026 — 22,734 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,747 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,752 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,759 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,773 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,763 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,769 subscribers22,7696 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,728–22,779 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:2622,769+6
12 Aug 2026, 05:3222,763-10
11 Aug 2026, 06:0122,773+14
10 Aug 2026, 06:5822,759+7
9 Aug 2026, 05:0422,752+5
8 Aug 2026, 02:4622,747+13
6 Aug 2026, 07:4022,734-1
6 Aug 2026, 02:0522,735first reading

Engagement

70 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.01%
avg views ÷ 22,769 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,050
70 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.428%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
70
of 70 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 65 of 70 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held70 (3 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total143,533
Reactions total580
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
196
Videos
15
Links
5,680

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

446 reactions across 49 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥14833.2%
12528.0%
custom 5323257658654860293429.42%
👍388.52%
🤯347.62%
custom 5276311376892010436327.17%
🤔122.69%
💯81.79%
😁51.12%
🌭10.224%
😢10.224%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 70 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 580reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 70 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @it_mentors. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 70 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC295 viewsread 13 August 2026

🎓 Срок: 247 дней 💵 Оффер: 320000 руб. gross Отзыв на ментора: @gardiys_support #gardiys_support Специальность: Python #python Услуга: Без коммерческого опыта #без_коммерческого_опыта К Антону я пришел не с нулевыми знаниями. До этого я учился в Яндекс.Лицее, поэтому какая-то база у меня уже была. Но довольно быстро стало понятно, что этого недостаточно. Не хватало понимания того, как вообще устроены процессы в IT-

13 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC811 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026

👍 Срок: 191 день 💵 Оффер: 225000 руб. gross Отзыв на ментора: @art185 #art185 Специальность: Системный аналитик #системный_аналитик Услуга: Без коммерческого опыта #без_коммерческого_опыта Как за полгода полностью поменять свою жизнь) Сразу скажу отзыв пишу с фейкового аккаунта, не хочется светить основной. Еще полгода назад я работала совершенно в другой сфере. Сегодня уже работаю в IT и получила оффер на 225 00

13 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC967 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🎓 Срок: 368 дней 💵 Оффер: 400000 руб. gross Отзыв на ментора: @go_president #go_president Специальность: Go / Golang #go Услуга: Смена стэка / специальности #смена_стэка_и_специальности Оффер на 400.000 ₽ в Golang Backend (смена стэка с Ruby на Go) Привет 🤙🏻 Начнем с бэкграунда. До обращения к ментору я ровно год проработал джуном-бэкендером на Ruby on Rails, но в определенный момент понял, что ошибся с выбором с

1🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC≈1,060 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

👍 Срок: 181 день 💵 Оффер: 215000 руб. gross Отзыв на ментора: @the7thsaint #the7thsaint Специальность: QA / Тестирование #qa Услуга: Без коммерческого опыта #без_коммерческого_опыта Пришел я к Павлу в ТГ 13 января 2026 и на след. день я уже вписался в обучение , а через 6 месяцев 20/07/2026 я вышел на свой первый рабочий день в качестве QAE ! После обучения у меня были собеседования в 3 фирмы, в две из них я получ

🔥5😁1

13 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC≈1,240 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🎓 Срок: 220 дней 💵 Оффер: €3900 gross Отзыв на ментора: @haskelmuse #haskelmuse Специальность: Java #java Услуга: Без коммерческого опыта #без_коммерческого_опыта #валютные_удалёнки Начал я свой путь ещё в начале 24 года на курсах, после прохождения курса я был в поисках работы полгода и за это время прошел 5 собеседований. К Владу пришел с планом улучшить свои знания и пройти на мидла. У него я узнал что ничего н

🔥21👍1

13 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC≈1,370 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

👍 Срок: 108 дней 💵 Оффер: 240000 руб. gross Отзыв на ментора: @castello #castello Специальность: QA / Тестирование #qa Услуга: Без коммерческого опыта #без_коммерческого_опыта Я пришел к Михаилу после непродолжительных курсов и нескольких неудачных попыток пройти собеседование. Понял, что без помощи не обойтись. Пообщавшись с несколькими менторами, решил, что с Михаилом общение оказалось самым комфортным, поэтому

2

13 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC≈1,510 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🎓 Срок: 384 дня 💵 Оффер: 207000 руб. gross Отзыв на ментора: @sandoromarini #sandoromarini Специальность: DevOps / SRE #devops Услуга: Без коммерческого опыта #без_коммерческого_опыта Курс оставил очень хорошее впечатление. Материал подаётся подробно и структурировано, но для меня самым большим плюсом стало то, что обучение было максимально практико-ориентированным и приближенным к реальным рабочим задачам. Это си

🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC≈2,100 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🔥 Срок: 97 дней 💵 Оффер: €5200 gross Отзыв на ментора: @kirasamsonova #kirasamsonova Специальность: Python #python Услуга: С коммерческим опытом #c_коммерческим_опытом #валютные_удалёнки Хочу поделиться своим опытом работы с Кирой и её командой. Я пришёл к ним с конкретной целью - найти валютную удалёнку. На тот момент у меня уже был неплохой технический опыт, но я понимал, что самостоятельно грамотно упаковать ег

12 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC≈2,020 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026

👍 Срок: 126 дней 💵 Оффер: 207000 руб. gross Отзыв на ментора: @castello #castello Специальность: QA / Тестирование #qa Услуга: Без коммерческого опыта #без_коммерческого_опыта Я пришла в QA практически с нуля, без опыта в IT, и до этого долго выбирала между проджектом и тестированием, но в итоге остановилась на QA. Честно говоря, изначально я не была уверена, что у меня получится, но решила попробовать — и сейчас

8

12 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC≈1,930 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

👍 Срок: 132 дня 💵 Оффер: 345000 руб. gross Отзыв на ментора: @go_president #go_president Специальность: Go / Golang #go Услуга: Смена стэка / специальности #смена_стэка_и_специальности Оффер на 345.000 ₽ (390 К после ИС) в Golang Backend за 4 месяца Всем привет! Хотел бы рассказать о том, как в 21 год я получил свой оффер 🙂 Начнём с того, как я вообще пришёл к Даниилу. На тот момент я работал стажёром Java разра

💯3🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC≈1,940 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026

👍 Срок: 185 дней 💵 Оффер: 280000 руб. gross Отзыв на ментора: @ruslan_kuyanets_mentor #ruslan_kuyanets_mentor Специальность: Frontend #frontend Услуга: Без коммерческого опыта #без_коммерческого_опыта Пришел к Руслану без опыта. До этого учился фронтенду примерно полгода, имел какую то базу, но при этом было много провалов, и в целом знания не были глубокими. Начал с js и за 4 месяца прошел всю программу. Система

🔥42👍1

12 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC≈1,930 views10 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026

🎓 Срок: 216 дней 💵 Оффер: 130000 руб. gross Отзыв на ментора: @qaconqueror #qaconqueror Специальность: QA / Тестирование #qa Услуга: Без коммерческого опыта #без_коммерческого_опыта Начал обучение у ментора Станислава в конце 2025 года. В самом начале про тестирование не знал ровным счетом ничего, но верил, что получится и искал человека, который грамотно даст мне знания. У Станислава очень удобная платформа для

5🔥3👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @it_mentors. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@it_mentors edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 5,122 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Ментор Храмцов Арсений. Отзывы
@a_khramtsov_reviews · 6
20 posts
Евгений Шушков | Отзывы
@shushkov_reviews · 14
20 posts
Отзывы - vsadnik
@vsadnik_reviews · 236
20 posts
Лукьянов Максим | Отзывы
@Avtostopom_po_G0_Otzivi · 35
19 posts
Отзывы: Квалити культ + Толчеев Влад
@quality_cult_feedback · 14
19 posts
YOURQAWAY | Отзывы
@yourqawayrecomendation · 15
19 posts
Эмилио — отзывы
@delete_from_it_reviews · 16
16 posts
1С Ментор: Отзывы
@Mentor1CProfiReviews · 138
13 posts
Обучение БA и CA
@AnalystConsult · 407
10 posts
Отзывы Иван | AnalystDement0r
@analystdement0r_reviews · 59
9 posts
туда-сюда и ты SA [Отзывы]
@tudasuda_feedback · 87
6 posts
Эд Пауль | Кузница офферов
@EduardPaul_Sputnik · 703
4 posts
1С Ментор | Надворный Владимир
@Mentor1CProfi · 561
3 posts
overfit together | Григорий Чернышов
@doommot_channel · 428
1 post
Осознанная Меркантильность | Антон Назаров
@m0rtymerr_channel · 79,580
1 post
1С Ментор | Адам
@Mentor_1C_Adam · 322
1 post
Менторство Reactify
@mentor_reactify · 559
1 post
Отзывы на менторство Андрея Царева
@reaperxu_reviews · 38
1 post
Отзывы на обучение от Романа Цакунова
@rvtsakunovreview · 67
1 post
Лёша Истомин | Отзывы
@webistomin_reviews · 5
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

IT Менторы - отзывы на консультации
@it_mentors_services · 804
20 posts
1С Ментор: Отзывы
@Mentor1CProfiReviews · 138
6 posts
Отзывы Артема Подвального
@podvalny_otzyv · 9
4 posts
Лукьянов Максим | Отзывы
@Avtostopom_po_G0_Otzivi · 35
3 posts
1С Ментор | Надворный Владимир
@Mentor1CProfi · 561
3 posts
1С Ментор | Адам
@Mentor_1C_Adam · 322
3 posts
Один день айтишника
@one_IT_day · 13,317
3 posts
Отзывы об IT Компаниях
@nazarov_interviews · 22,870
2 posts
Ментор Храмцов Арсений. Отзывы
@a_khramtsov_reviews · 6
1 post
Артём Романович: Менторство
@art_rom · 850
1 post
Путь к CEO (18+) | Борцов Дмитрий
@bortsov_it · 1,633
1 post
Эмилио — отзывы
@delete_from_it_reviews · 16
1 post
Церковь фронтенда by Антон Медведев
@frontendchurchru · 970
1 post
Осознанная Меркантильность | Антон Назаров
@m0rtymerr_channel · 79,580
1 post
Профсоюзная 2.0 | Волчьи следы
@nazarov_travel · 4,809
1 post
Квалити культ | Толчеев Владислав
@quality_cult · 822
1 post
Рефералки в IT | Вакансии и резюме
@refer_me_it · 30,236
1 post
Саша IT Отзывы
@sanya_it_otzovi · 8
1 post
Женя про айти
@shushkov_it · 2,983
1 post
Даниил | Путь в Системную аналитику
@system_analytica · 909
1 post
туда-сюда и ты SA [Отзывы]
@tudasuda_feedback · 87
1 post
YOURQAWAY | Отзывы
@yourqawayrecomendation · 15
1 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IT менторы - отзывы на офферы” (@it_mentors), 22,769 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/it_mentors.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.