Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Квалити культ | Толчеев Владислав

@quality_cult

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

822subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001489068055
TypeChannel
Username@quality_cult
DescriptionПро QA и Automation💥 ЛС: @tolcheevvladislav
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/quality_cult

Growth

8227 Aug 2026, 14:08 — 822 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:32 — 822 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:088 Aug 2026, 01:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 821–823 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 01:32822no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:08822first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 31 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.0%
avg views ÷ 822 subscribers
Avg views / post
320
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held15 (31 December 202526 July 2026)
Views total961
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
29
Videos
3
Links
26

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

105 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4341.0%
💯1817.1%
🎉1413.3%
👍109.52%
👀76.67%
😁65.71%
54.76%
🤝21.90%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 15:36 UTCviews —

Квалити культ | Толчеев Владислав pinned «Хочу записать видео с разбором вопросов про вкат в QA Automation Если заходите с нуля, переходите из ручного QA или уже учитесь — накидайте вопросов: про стек, обучение, практику, собесы, поиск работы и всё, что сейчас стопорит Соберу вопросы и отвечу на…»

26 Jul 2026, 15:36 UTC283 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Хочу записать видео с разбором вопросов про вкат в QA Automation Если заходите с нуля, переходите из ручного QA или уже учитесь — накидайте вопросов: про стек, обучение, практику, собесы, поиск работы и всё, что сейчас стопорит Соберу вопросы и отвечу на них в отдельном ролике Форма анонимная, заполнить — 2 минуты: https://forms.gle/cy58JQ2SxHJnVWKQ6

🔥5

23 Jul 2026, 10:07 UTC338 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @m0rtymerr_channel

Выиграй бесплатный билет на конференцию "Профсоюзная" Розыгрываем 3 билета на конференцию от работяг для работяг. Для участия в розыгрыше достаточно сделать всего 2 простых действия: 1) Подписаться на телеграмм каналы "Осознанная меркантильность" и "IT менторы - отзывы на офферы" 2) Нажать кнопку "Участвовать" * Чем больше друзей пригласишь на участие в розыгрыше – тем больше шансов на победу 🐺🐺🐺Не пропусти шанс п

27 Mar 2026, 09:48 UTC818 viewsread 8 August 2026

Не теряем доступ к чатам и каналам

27 Mar 2026, 09:48 UTC≈1,020 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @m0rtymerr_channelPhoto

Устраиваем отрицательный рост замедлению Ребята, последнее время у всех наблюдаются сложности при использовании наших ботов и miniapp'a. Ниже присылаем инструкцию как решить проблему недоступности: 1. Необходимо произвести донастройку ТГ в ручном режиме, ниже высылаем кнопку для автоматической донастройки ТГ: Настройка 1 Настройка 2 Настройка 3 Настройка 4 Настройка 5 Настройка 6 Настройка 7 Настройка 8 Настройка

5👍2

6 Mar 2026, 09:55 UTC907 viewsread 8 August 2026

Го участвовать и друзей звать в опросе, это полезная статистика по рынку

6 Mar 2026, 09:55 UTC925 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @m0rtymerr_channelPhoto

ОПРОС: Сколько айтишников крутит опыт, увольняют ли, помогло ли устроиться Собрали вопросы, которые помогут понять, почему айтишники на самом деле вынуждены накручивать опыт и как это действительно влияет на работу. В опросе всего 13 пунктов, прохождение займет меньше 5 минут, а результаты мы выложим публично и покажем HR-ам. Пересылай друзьям из IT — опрос полностью анонимный. Ссылка на опрос: https://forms.gle/d

👍8🤝2

21 Feb 2026, 11:47 UTC≈1,260 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как же мощно эНэН ру греет работяг на курсы (причем нерелевантные) Аж в двух частях экранов. Можно еще при создании резюме спрашивать "А ТЫ ПРОШËЛ ЭТОТ ВОЛШЕБНЫЙ КУРС?! ЕЩË НЕТ!? НАДО КУПИТЬ И ТОЛЬКО ПОСЛЕ ВВОДА КОДА ПОСЛЕ ПОКУПКИ ИЗ ПОЧТЫ СМОЖЕШЬ ОПУБЛИКОВАТЬ РЕЗЮМКУ!"

💯18👀7😁6

5 Feb 2026, 10:33 UTC≈1,300 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Хочу на следующей неделе провести эксперимент: сделаю новое резюме и посмотрим на конверсии и тд (не прогрев, честна) Под какой стэк делаем?

🔥23

5 Feb 2026, 10:32 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Делаем резюме AQA на

  1. AQA Java35%
  2. AQA Python52%
  3. AQA JS\TS13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Jan 2026, 09:55 UTCviews —

Квалити культ | Толчеев Владислав pinned «Без булщит прогревов сходу: Перекат из ручного в AQA Java Если хочешь в этом году новую работу в роли автоматизатора, то пиши в ЛС @tolcheevvladislav Upd. Набрали группу)»

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @quality_cult. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Feb 2026, 10:32 UTCAnonymous Poll213 voters

Делаем резюме AQA на

  1. AQA Java35%
  2. AQA Python52%
  3. AQA JS\TS13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 26 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Квалити культ | Толчеев Владислав” (@quality_cult), 822 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quality_cult.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.