Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

#ПерезагрузкаКарьеры

@hrexpert63

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15,124subscribers

+97 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001511008900
TypeChannel
Username@hrexpert63
DescriptionЭксперт по обе стороны найма. Помогаю компаниям растить лучших людей, а людям — находить компании мечты и строить в них выдающуюся карьеру Подробнее https://hrexpert63.tilda.ws/academia_career Отзывы @hrexpert63_feedback Консультации, связь @hrexpert
Created14 November 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hrexpert63

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

15,02115,12415,072.56 August 2026 — 15,027 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,029 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,028 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,033 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,028 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,021 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,038 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,124 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +97. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,006–15,139 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:4315,124+86
11 Aug 2026, 16:2315,038+17
10 Aug 2026, 19:1815,021-7
9 Aug 2026, 19:2115,028-5
8 Aug 2026, 17:3815,033+5
7 Aug 2026, 14:5715,028-1
6 Aug 2026, 16:3115,029+2
6 Aug 2026, 03:4815,027first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.77%
avg views ÷ 15,124 subscribers
Avg views / post
419
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held29 (28 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total12,162
Reactions total237
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,070
Videos
229
Links
1,560

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 15s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

226 reactions across 22 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8939.4%
4419.5%
👍229.73%
😁187.96%
👏135.75%
💯104.42%
😱93.98%
🤣62.65%
💔52.21%
🏆31.33%
🙊20.885%
🍌10.442%
😨10.442%
🙏10.442%
🤝10.442%
🤬10.442%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 237reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC195 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Какое резюме прикреплять, когда вы откликаетесь не на HH.ru, а, например, через карьерный сайт компании? Казалось бы, вопрос выеденного яйца не стоит, но сколько копий сломано, а резюме потеряно в недрах баз данных рекрутеров, от того, что приложили не тот формат. Не счесть! Так что внемлите и обрящете сохраняйте, чтобы рекрутеры вас любили и на руках носили! Напоминаю, мы говорим о ФОРМАТЕ, а не о содержании резю

2👍1🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC236 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

⚡️ Здравствуйте, Дорогие подписчики! Представляем вашему вниманию подборку полезных каналов в сфере «Образование и наука» 🔥 Будем очень рады, если вы найдете для себя что-нибудь полезное. ❗️Ссылка на папку: https://t.me/addlist/yFRZdQyinAo3ZjZi

👍3🔥1🤝1

11 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC294 views28 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Хотите взбесить рекрутера - пришлите ему нестандартное, яркое, аутентичное резюме. ❗️Сразу сделаю важную оговорку: если ваша карьерная стратегия ограничивается исключительно нажатием кнопки на HeadHunter, этот риск вас обойдет стороной. Платформа строго задает структуру, и загрузить туда нестандартную анкету при всем желании не выйдет. Но как только вы выходите в открытый космос за пределы привычного джоб-борда — о

🔥243😱1

11 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC306 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Будет больно, сложно и местами захочется всё бросить Какое-то время назад (если быть точной, то в начале 2026-го) я записала большое видео про кризис белых воротничков и реалии рынка труда. Как всегда без купюр, высокопарных слов и великих мотивационных речей делюсь в нем тем, что вас реально ждет при выходе на открытый рынок или кардинальной смене карьеры (а не то, что вам радостно обещают на лендингах онлайн-школ

🔥21

10 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC288 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Сводка с полей ОФФЕРЫ На фоне цифр выше о неработающих откликах и алгоритмических фильтрах хочется показать вам обратную сторону медали. Потому что пока одни воюют с ветряными мельницами джоб-бордов, другие грамотно обходят системы оценки и получают заветные письма счастья с приглашениями на работу. Делюсь результатами нашей работы на прошлом интенсиве Идеальный Кандидат AI (и упорства самих кандидатов - тут 100 %

🔥32👏2

10 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC267 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Почему 100 откликов в месяц больше не работают? Вы нажимаете кнопку «Откликнуться», идете на кухню за кофе, а по возвращении видите в почте отказ. С момента отправки прошло ровно 45 секунд. Кто-то успел оценить ваш блестящий опыт? Разумеется, нет - это автоотказ. Тем временем в новостях с завидной регулярностью рапортуют о рекордно низкой безработице в 2,0–2,2%. Минтруд и Центробанк сокрушаются о демографической ям

🔥21👍1

9 Aug 2026, 06:51 UTC314 views20 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

То есть мы вот это вот все на себе мужественно вывозим и при этом еще думаем, что мы дефектные! Мы делаем больше при меньшей поддержке, потому что сама инфраструктура вокруг нас строилась для другого мира, которого давно нет, а новый пока еще только в зачатке. В общем я для себя решила так - отправляем идеальные картинки из Pinterest куда подальше. Вряд ли есть на свете идеальная мама-робот, которая все успевает и

👍98🔥3

9 Aug 2026, 06:51 UTC284 views23 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Я плохая мать?! Про родительство и чувство вины. #субботнийконтент пожаловал во внеурочное время. Уезжаем с дачи, ребенок: "Мама, вы что на 5 дней уезжаете? Это же так долго! Я не выдержу!" и все это с полными слез глазами, прощаниями и 300 раз повторенным, что все мы будем скучать очень сильно и скоро увидимся. Не знаю с каким там ощущением остается дочь, об этом она потом расскажет своем психологу (хотя по слова

👏119🔥2💯1

7 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC382 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Пятничное! Как говорил Якубович «и дай вам Бог, чтобы вы могли почувствовать себя миллионером хотя бы в выходные» #hrюмор @hrexpert63

😁10👍2💯2🤣1

6 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC380 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026

М-да, реакций на ветрянку было явно больше🙈

😁4🤣2🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC413 views26 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Новости две и обе в цифрах. Первая - канал наконец-то перешагнул порог в 15 000 подписчиков 🎉🎉🎉 Если б вы знали как я этого ждала! Казалось бы, ну пора уже перестать заморачиваться на цифрах, но, согласитесь 15к глазу приятнее, чем 14923, да? (Вообще у меня к концу года в планах было 20 тысяч, но тут с этими блокировками неизвестно как повернется, так что 15 это уже просто ВАУ!) Спасибо вам, что вы здесь! И вторая

🔥183🏆3👍2

6 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC420 views32 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Жизнь как зебра, в прошлом году в этот день я заболела ветрянкой в 34 года и это был такой себе опыт, который оставил несколько ощутимых изменений вмятин на моем лице и не только (фото слабонервным не смотреть, я предупредила), а в этом году у меня 6 августа произошло ровно два очень значимых события. Рассказать? P.S. Надеюсь вы ставите 🔥 мне, а не ветрянке😂

🔥17😱8💔5🙊2

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @hrexpert63. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 182,184 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“#ПерезагрузкаКарьеры” (@hrexpert63), 15,124 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hrexpert63.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.